{"title":"Correlation between ultrasonography and elastography parameters and molecular subtypes of breast cancer in young women.","authors":"Dian-Xia Men, Hui-Zhan Li, Juan Dong, Meng-Hua Xue, Zhi-Fen Wang, Wen-Li Xiao, Ji-Ping Xue, Mei-Hong Jia","doi":"10.1080/07853890.2024.2443041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the differences of conventional ultrasound characteristics, elastic imaging parameters and clinicopathological characteristics of distinct molecular subtypes of breast cancer in young women, and to identify imaging parameters that exhibited significant associations with each molecular subtype.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis encompassing 310 young women with breast cancer. Observations were made regarding the ultrasonography and elastography characteristics of the identified breast lesions. Subsequently, based on immunohistochemistry results patients were classified into five distinct molecular subtypes: luminal A, luminal B (HER2-), luminal B (HER2+), HER2+, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Clinical, pathological, and ultrasound imaging features were compared among these subtypes using binary logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically significant differences were observed in various parameters across the five molecular subtypes (<i>p</i> < 0.05), including tumor size, morphology, margins, calcification, posterior echo features, blood flow (Adler grading), and tumor hardness. Specifically, luminal A subtype exhibited propensity for spiculated margins, lower blood flow grading, and decreased hardness; luminal B subtype was characterized by angular margins; HER2+ subtype manifested higher blood flow grading, calcification, and elevated hardness. Conversely, TNBC subtype displayed smooth margins, absence of calcification, and heightened hardness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Specific molecular subtypes of breast cancer have unique ultrasonic and elastic imaging characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":93874,"journal":{"name":"Annals of medicine","volume":"57 1","pages":"2443041"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2024.2443041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To explore the differences of conventional ultrasound characteristics, elastic imaging parameters and clinicopathological characteristics of distinct molecular subtypes of breast cancer in young women, and to identify imaging parameters that exhibited significant associations with each molecular subtype.
Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis encompassing 310 young women with breast cancer. Observations were made regarding the ultrasonography and elastography characteristics of the identified breast lesions. Subsequently, based on immunohistochemistry results patients were classified into five distinct molecular subtypes: luminal A, luminal B (HER2-), luminal B (HER2+), HER2+, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Clinical, pathological, and ultrasound imaging features were compared among these subtypes using binary logistic regression analysis.
Results: Statistically significant differences were observed in various parameters across the five molecular subtypes (p < 0.05), including tumor size, morphology, margins, calcification, posterior echo features, blood flow (Adler grading), and tumor hardness. Specifically, luminal A subtype exhibited propensity for spiculated margins, lower blood flow grading, and decreased hardness; luminal B subtype was characterized by angular margins; HER2+ subtype manifested higher blood flow grading, calcification, and elevated hardness. Conversely, TNBC subtype displayed smooth margins, absence of calcification, and heightened hardness.
Conclusion: Specific molecular subtypes of breast cancer have unique ultrasonic and elastic imaging characteristics.
目的:探讨年轻女性乳腺癌不同分子亚型的常规超声特征、弹性影像学参数及临床病理特征的差异,并找出与各分子亚型有显著相关性的影像学参数。方法:我们对310名患有乳腺癌的年轻女性进行了回顾性分析。观察关于超声和弹性成像特征的确定乳房病变。随后,根据免疫组化结果将患者分为5种不同的分子亚型:luminal A、luminal B (HER2-)、luminal B (HER2+)、HER2+和三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)。采用二元logistic回归分析比较这些亚型的临床、病理和超声成像特征。结果:5种分子亚型间各参数差异有统计学意义(p)。结论:乳腺癌特定分子亚型具有独特的超声和弹性影像学特征。