Evaluation of dose distribution to the tumor and organs at risk for cervical cancer patients treated using HDR-ICBT without central tandem applicator: A single center based experience.

Jonasi A Foya, Mwingereza J Kumwenda, Khamis O Amour, Jofrey J Masana
{"title":"Evaluation of dose distribution to the tumor and organs at risk for cervical cancer patients treated using HDR-ICBT without central tandem applicator: A single center based experience.","authors":"Jonasi A Foya, Mwingereza J Kumwenda, Khamis O Amour, Jofrey J Masana","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.10.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Cervical cancer is the most prevalent type of cancer among women in numerous low and middle-income countries. Tandem-based applicator is a widely used technique in High Dose Rate Intercavitary Brachytherapy (HDR-ICBT) for treating cervical cancer. For cases where central tandem insertion is not feasible due to patient-specific conditions, a ring-only applicator is used as an alternative. This paper presents an assessment of the impacts of dose distribution on cervical cancer treatment using HDR-ICBT without a central tandem applicator.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>Total 30 patients with cervical cancer (stage IB to IVA) who received brachytherapy with a ring applicator alone were singled out and used in the study. Orthogonal radiographs were used during dose treatment planning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicate that the dose normalized to the Equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) at Manchester Dosimetry System (MDS) point A was 60.60 ± 1.08 Gy, which is significantly below the recommended curative dose of 80 Gy. This suggests that relying solely on a ring applicator may not provide enough radiation doses to the tumor. The results also show that the International Commission on Radiation Units (ICRU) dose point underestimated the radiation doses to the bladder and rectum, with the ratios of maximum dose (D<sub>Max</sub>) to D<sub>ICRU</sub> for both organs being 1.15.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study underscores the importance of not exclusively depending on a ring applicator alone in HDR-ICBT treatment for cervical cancer, as it may lead to suboptimal tumor doses. The ICRU point's results show an underestimation of the rectum and bladder dose during HDR-ICBT.</p>","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2024.10.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Cervical cancer is the most prevalent type of cancer among women in numerous low and middle-income countries. Tandem-based applicator is a widely used technique in High Dose Rate Intercavitary Brachytherapy (HDR-ICBT) for treating cervical cancer. For cases where central tandem insertion is not feasible due to patient-specific conditions, a ring-only applicator is used as an alternative. This paper presents an assessment of the impacts of dose distribution on cervical cancer treatment using HDR-ICBT without a central tandem applicator.

Materials and method: Total 30 patients with cervical cancer (stage IB to IVA) who received brachytherapy with a ring applicator alone were singled out and used in the study. Orthogonal radiographs were used during dose treatment planning.

Results: Results indicate that the dose normalized to the Equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) at Manchester Dosimetry System (MDS) point A was 60.60 ± 1.08 Gy, which is significantly below the recommended curative dose of 80 Gy. This suggests that relying solely on a ring applicator may not provide enough radiation doses to the tumor. The results also show that the International Commission on Radiation Units (ICRU) dose point underestimated the radiation doses to the bladder and rectum, with the ratios of maximum dose (DMax) to DICRU for both organs being 1.15.

Conclusion: The study underscores the importance of not exclusively depending on a ring applicator alone in HDR-ICBT treatment for cervical cancer, as it may lead to suboptimal tumor doses. The ICRU point's results show an underestimation of the rectum and bladder dose during HDR-ICBT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估使用HDR-ICBT治疗的宫颈癌患者肿瘤和危险器官的剂量分布:基于单中心的经验。
背景和目的:在许多低收入和中等收入国家,宫颈癌是妇女中最常见的癌症类型。串联应用器是宫颈癌高剂量率腔间近距离放射治疗(HDR-ICBT)中广泛应用的一种技术。对于由于患者特殊情况而无法进行中央串联插入的病例,可使用仅环涂抹器作为替代。本文介绍了剂量分布对使用HDR-ICBT治疗宫颈癌无中心串联应用器的影响的评估。材料和方法:选取30例仅行环形涂抹器近距离放疗的宫颈癌患者(IB期至IVA期)。在剂量治疗计划中使用正交x线片。结果:结果显示,在曼彻斯特剂量测定系统(MDS) A点归一化为2 Gy当量剂量(EQD2)的剂量为60.60±1.08 Gy,明显低于推荐治疗剂量80 Gy。这表明,仅仅依靠环形照射器可能无法为肿瘤提供足够的辐射剂量。结果还表明,国际放射单位委员会(ICRU)剂量点低估了膀胱和直肠的辐射剂量,两个器官的最大剂量(DMax)与DICRU之比为1.15。结论:该研究强调了在宫颈癌HDR-ICBT治疗中不完全依赖环形涂抹器的重要性,因为它可能导致肿瘤剂量不理想。ICRU点的结果显示在HDR-ICBT期间直肠和膀胱剂量的低估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From patient to pioneer: The inspiring journey of Dr. Brian Moran. Learning curve and proficiency assessment for gynecological brachytherapy amongst radiation oncology trainees in India: Results from a prospective study. A retrospective study on ruthenium-106 and strontium-90 eye-plaques treatment for retinoblastoma: 16-years clinical experience. The influence of time and implants in high-dose rate image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. Early outcomes following local salvage treatment with MRI-assisted low-dose rate brachytherapy (MARS) for MRI-visible postsurgical bed recurrences and focal intraprostatic recurrences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1