J. Zwirner , J.N. Waddell , B. Ondruschka , K.C. Li
{"title":"3D-printed suction clamps for tensile testing of brain tissue","authors":"J. Zwirner , J.N. Waddell , B. Ondruschka , K.C. Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The conventional mounting of ultra-soft biological tissues often involves gluing it between two plates or manually tightening grips. Both methods demand delicate handling skills and are time-consuming. This study outlines the design and practical application of 3D-printed suction clamps for uniaxial tension tests on brain samples. Successful testing was defined by the absence of relevant slippage or the sample being drawn into the clamp. A total of 112 deer brain samples underwent testing using a universal testing machine after one freeze-thaw cycle. These samples were obtained from eight different brain regions. During sample preparation, 7 out of all samples failed. Among the 105 tests, 89 (85%) were successful. Of the 16 unsuccessful tests, 15 samples (14%) slipped, while only one sample (1%) was drawn into the clamp to an extent that testing became impossible. Medulla oblongata samples exhibited exceptionally high slippage at 38%, whereas samples from the temporal cortex, external capsule, and putamen had the lowest slippage in only one single case. In conclusion, suction clamps facilitate high-throughput testing through user-friendly and rapid sample mounting. Testing success is contingent on the specific brain site, with sample slippage being the primary reason for testing failures, while sample inspiration into the clamp is negligible.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 106873"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616124005058","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The conventional mounting of ultra-soft biological tissues often involves gluing it between two plates or manually tightening grips. Both methods demand delicate handling skills and are time-consuming. This study outlines the design and practical application of 3D-printed suction clamps for uniaxial tension tests on brain samples. Successful testing was defined by the absence of relevant slippage or the sample being drawn into the clamp. A total of 112 deer brain samples underwent testing using a universal testing machine after one freeze-thaw cycle. These samples were obtained from eight different brain regions. During sample preparation, 7 out of all samples failed. Among the 105 tests, 89 (85%) were successful. Of the 16 unsuccessful tests, 15 samples (14%) slipped, while only one sample (1%) was drawn into the clamp to an extent that testing became impossible. Medulla oblongata samples exhibited exceptionally high slippage at 38%, whereas samples from the temporal cortex, external capsule, and putamen had the lowest slippage in only one single case. In conclusion, suction clamps facilitate high-throughput testing through user-friendly and rapid sample mounting. Testing success is contingent on the specific brain site, with sample slippage being the primary reason for testing failures, while sample inspiration into the clamp is negligible.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials is concerned with the mechanical deformation, damage and failure under applied forces, of biological material (at the tissue, cellular and molecular levels) and of biomaterials, i.e. those materials which are designed to mimic or replace biological materials.
The primary focus of the journal is the synthesis of materials science, biology, and medical and dental science. Reports of fundamental scientific investigations are welcome, as are articles concerned with the practical application of materials in medical devices. Both experimental and theoretical work is of interest; theoretical papers will normally include comparison of predictions with experimental data, though we recognize that this may not always be appropriate. The journal also publishes technical notes concerned with emerging experimental or theoretical techniques, letters to the editor and, by invitation, review articles and papers describing existing techniques for the benefit of an interdisciplinary readership.