Genome‐wide association study on chronic postsurgical pain after abdominal surgeries in the UK Biobank

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1111/anae.16528
Song Li, Masja K. Toneman, Judith P. M. Mangnus, Stefano Strocchi, Regina L. M. van Boekel, Kris C. P. Vissers, Richard P. G. ten Broek, Marieke J. H. Coenen
{"title":"Genome‐wide association study on chronic postsurgical pain after abdominal surgeries in the UK Biobank","authors":"Song Li, Masja K. Toneman, Judith P. M. Mangnus, Stefano Strocchi, Regina L. M. van Boekel, Kris C. P. Vissers, Richard P. G. ten Broek, Marieke J. H. Coenen","doi":"10.1111/anae.16528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SummaryIntroductionChronic pain is one of the most common and severe complications after surgery, affecting quality of life and overall wellbeing of patients. Several risk factors have been identified but the mechanisms of chronic postsurgical pain development remain unclear. This study aimed to identify single‐nucleotide polymorphisms associated with developing chronic postsurgical pain after abdominal surgery, one of the most common types of surgery.MethodsA genome‐wide association study was performed on 27,603 patients from the UK Biobank who underwent abdominal surgery. The robustness of identified loci was validated by split‐half validation analysis. Functionally related top loci were selected for expression validation in clinical samples of adhesions from patients with and without pain.ResultsOne locus (rs185545327) reached genome‐wide significance for association with chronic postsurgical pain development, and 10 loci surpassed the suggestively significant threshold (p &lt; 1 × 10<jats:sup>‐6</jats:sup>). In the robustness analysis, eight loci had at least nominal significance. The loci passing the suggestively significant threshold were mapped to 15 genes, of which two loci contained pain‐related genes (<jats:italic>SRPK2</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>PDE4D</jats:italic>). Although marginally approaching statistical significance in the expression validation of clinical samples, the detection rate and expression level of PDE4D were modestly higher in patients with pain compared with those in the control group.DiscussionThis study provides preliminary evidence for genetic risk factors implicated in chronic postsurgical pain following abdominal surgery, particularly the <jats:italic>PDE4D</jats:italic> gene, which has been associated with pain in previous studies. The findings add to evidence suggesting potential for the future development of a clinically applicable tool for personalised risk prediction, aiding clinicians in stratifying patients and enhancing clinical decision‐making through individualised risk assessments.","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16528","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SummaryIntroductionChronic pain is one of the most common and severe complications after surgery, affecting quality of life and overall wellbeing of patients. Several risk factors have been identified but the mechanisms of chronic postsurgical pain development remain unclear. This study aimed to identify single‐nucleotide polymorphisms associated with developing chronic postsurgical pain after abdominal surgery, one of the most common types of surgery.MethodsA genome‐wide association study was performed on 27,603 patients from the UK Biobank who underwent abdominal surgery. The robustness of identified loci was validated by split‐half validation analysis. Functionally related top loci were selected for expression validation in clinical samples of adhesions from patients with and without pain.ResultsOne locus (rs185545327) reached genome‐wide significance for association with chronic postsurgical pain development, and 10 loci surpassed the suggestively significant threshold (p < 1 × 10‐6). In the robustness analysis, eight loci had at least nominal significance. The loci passing the suggestively significant threshold were mapped to 15 genes, of which two loci contained pain‐related genes (SRPK2, PDE4D). Although marginally approaching statistical significance in the expression validation of clinical samples, the detection rate and expression level of PDE4D were modestly higher in patients with pain compared with those in the control group.DiscussionThis study provides preliminary evidence for genetic risk factors implicated in chronic postsurgical pain following abdominal surgery, particularly the PDE4D gene, which has been associated with pain in previous studies. The findings add to evidence suggesting potential for the future development of a clinically applicable tool for personalised risk prediction, aiding clinicians in stratifying patients and enhancing clinical decision‐making through individualised risk assessments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国生物库中腹部手术后慢性疼痛的全基因组关联研究
慢性疼痛是手术后最常见和最严重的并发症之一,影响患者的生活质量和整体健康。已经确定了几个危险因素,但慢性术后疼痛发展的机制仍不清楚。本研究旨在确定与腹部手术后慢性术后疼痛相关的单核苷酸多态性,腹部手术是最常见的手术类型之一。方法对来自UK Biobank接受腹部手术的27,603例患者进行全基因组关联研究。鉴定的基因座的稳健性通过对半验证分析进行验证。选择功能相关的顶部基因座,在有疼痛和无疼痛的粘连患者的临床样本中进行表达验证。结果1个位点(rs185545327)与慢性术后疼痛发展的相关性达到全基因组显著性,10个位点超过了提示性显著阈值(p <;1 × 10‐6)。在稳健性分析中,8个位点至少具有名义显著性。通过暗示显著阈值的位点被定位到15个基因,其中两个位点包含疼痛相关基因(SRPK2, PDE4D)。虽然在临床样本的表达验证中,PDE4D的检出率和表达水平在疼痛患者中与对照组相比略有接近统计学意义,但PDE4D在疼痛患者中的检出率和表达水平略高于对照组。本研究为腹部手术后慢性术后疼痛的遗传风险因素提供了初步证据,特别是PDE4D基因,该基因在之前的研究中与疼痛有关。这一发现进一步证明了个性化风险预测的临床应用工具的未来发展潜力,帮助临床医生对患者进行分层,并通过个性化风险评估加强临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
期刊最新文献
The association between BMI and postoperative pulmonary complications in adults undergoing non-cardiac, non-obstetric surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Causes of and risk factors for unplanned readmission in a large cohort of patients undergoing major surgery: a retrospective cohort study Artificial intelligence in healthcare: medical technology or technology medical? Toxic leadership: when culture sabotages clinical excellence Issue Information – Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1