How many L2 word meanings can learners recall? A latent trait approach to vocabulary size estimation

IF 3.6 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS Applied Linguistics Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1093/applin/amae087
Akira Hamada, Yuko Hoshino, Masumi Kojima, Kazumi Aizawa, Tatsuo Iso, Yuichiro Kobayashi
{"title":"How many L2 word meanings can learners recall? A latent trait approach to vocabulary size estimation","authors":"Akira Hamada, Yuko Hoshino, Masumi Kojima, Kazumi Aizawa, Tatsuo Iso, Yuichiro Kobayashi","doi":"10.1093/applin/amae087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the size of meaning-recall vocabulary knowledge and its variations across word-frequency and second language (L2) proficiency levels. Despite the extensive research history in determining lexical coverage and thresholds for effective L2 use, much of the evidence is based on measures of meaning-recognition vocabulary knowledge. Using a latent-trait approach, we calculated the probability that learners could recall the meaning of each word in a vocabulary size test. Differences in vocabulary size between recognition and recall formats were analyzed across word-frequency bands and L2 proficiency levels. Results indicate that most learners struggle to recall the meanings of word families beyond the second-most frequent band. Moreover, the gap between meaning-recall and meaning-recognition vocabulary sizes was substantial and expanded as word-frequency and L2 proficiency levels decreased. These findings contribute to defining realistic L2 vocabulary teaching goals and selecting appropriate teaching methods. Construct-irrelevant measurements lead to a misunderstanding of L2 lexical proficiency, emphasizing the importance of test format selection according to the developmental stages of learners’ vocabulary knowledge.","PeriodicalId":48234,"journal":{"name":"Applied Linguistics","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amae087","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the size of meaning-recall vocabulary knowledge and its variations across word-frequency and second language (L2) proficiency levels. Despite the extensive research history in determining lexical coverage and thresholds for effective L2 use, much of the evidence is based on measures of meaning-recognition vocabulary knowledge. Using a latent-trait approach, we calculated the probability that learners could recall the meaning of each word in a vocabulary size test. Differences in vocabulary size between recognition and recall formats were analyzed across word-frequency bands and L2 proficiency levels. Results indicate that most learners struggle to recall the meanings of word families beyond the second-most frequent band. Moreover, the gap between meaning-recall and meaning-recognition vocabulary sizes was substantial and expanded as word-frequency and L2 proficiency levels decreased. These findings contribute to defining realistic L2 vocabulary teaching goals and selecting appropriate teaching methods. Construct-irrelevant measurements lead to a misunderstanding of L2 lexical proficiency, emphasizing the importance of test format selection according to the developmental stages of learners’ vocabulary knowledge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习者能回忆起多少 L2 词义?估算词汇量的潜在特质方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Linguistics
Applied Linguistics LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Applied Linguistics publishes research into language with relevance to real-world problems. The journal is keen to help make connections between fields, theories, research methods, and scholarly discourses, and welcomes contributions which critically reflect on current practices in applied linguistic research. It promotes scholarly and scientific discussion of issues that unite or divide scholars in applied linguistics. It is less interested in the ad hoc solution of particular problems and more interested in the handling of problems in a principled way by reference to theoretical studies.
期刊最新文献
Decolonizing language learning in digital environments through the voices of plurilingual learners in the Global South Overcoming COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: An investigation of the Foreign Language Effect ‘We can fix this. Let’s get you out of trouble, son’: an analysis of the transitivity and appraisal patterns in the Netflix TV show When They See Us How many L2 word meanings can learners recall? A latent trait approach to vocabulary size estimation Linking adverbials in children’s writing: Exploring variation across year groups, genres, and disciplines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1