Reported outcomes following cytoreductive surgery for colorectal peritoneal metastases: A systematic review to inform evidence-based practice and international consensus.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Colorectal Disease Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1111/codi.17280
Pratik Raichurkar, Kilian Brown, Cherry Koh, Annie Dela Cruz, Darshan Sitharthan, Brendan Moran, Nabila Ansari, Nima Ahmadi, Michael Solomon, Daniel Steffens
{"title":"Reported outcomes following cytoreductive surgery for colorectal peritoneal metastases: A systematic review to inform evidence-based practice and international consensus.","authors":"Pratik Raichurkar, Kilian Brown, Cherry Koh, Annie Dela Cruz, Darshan Sitharthan, Brendan Moran, Nabila Ansari, Nima Ahmadi, Michael Solomon, Daniel Steffens","doi":"10.1111/codi.17280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Cytoreductive surgery provides a chance for long-term survival and cure in selected patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases. As clinical and academic interest in this field increases, heterogeneity in outcome reporting hinders the valid and meaningful synthesis of data into high-quality meta-analyses. The aim of this systemic review was to investigate variability in outcome reporting following cytoreductive surgery with or without intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Five electronic databases [MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)] were interrogated from 2000 to October 2023 to identify all reported outcomes in the current literature. Extracted outcomes were catalogued and reviewed by a multidisciplinary working group into standardized terms and domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 294 studies, from 5112 screened, were included for analysis. We extracted 2903 outcomes verbatim from included studies and catalogued them into 85 standardized outcomes across seven outcome domains. The most frequently reported domains were survival, in 274 (93%) studies, and pathological outcomes, in 232 (79%) studies. Outcomes pertaining to function and life impact were only reported in seven (2%) studies. Reported outcomes were only defined in 35% of cases, and significant variability existed between definitions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review highlights the heterogeneity of outcome measurement and reporting following cytoreductive surgery for colorectal peritoneal metastases. Patient-reported outcomes are relatively underrepresented in the current literature. The results of this review will inform an international collaborative effort to create a core outcome set to address these issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":10512,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Disease","volume":"27 1","pages":"e17280"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.17280","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Cytoreductive surgery provides a chance for long-term survival and cure in selected patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases. As clinical and academic interest in this field increases, heterogeneity in outcome reporting hinders the valid and meaningful synthesis of data into high-quality meta-analyses. The aim of this systemic review was to investigate variability in outcome reporting following cytoreductive surgery with or without intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases.

Method: Five electronic databases [MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)] were interrogated from 2000 to October 2023 to identify all reported outcomes in the current literature. Extracted outcomes were catalogued and reviewed by a multidisciplinary working group into standardized terms and domains.

Results: A total of 294 studies, from 5112 screened, were included for analysis. We extracted 2903 outcomes verbatim from included studies and catalogued them into 85 standardized outcomes across seven outcome domains. The most frequently reported domains were survival, in 274 (93%) studies, and pathological outcomes, in 232 (79%) studies. Outcomes pertaining to function and life impact were only reported in seven (2%) studies. Reported outcomes were only defined in 35% of cases, and significant variability existed between definitions.

Conclusion: This systematic review highlights the heterogeneity of outcome measurement and reporting following cytoreductive surgery for colorectal peritoneal metastases. Patient-reported outcomes are relatively underrepresented in the current literature. The results of this review will inform an international collaborative effort to create a core outcome set to address these issues.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结直肠腹膜转移的细胞减少手术后的报道结果:一项系统综述,以证据为基础的实践和国际共识。
目的:细胞减少手术为结直肠腹膜转移患者提供了长期生存和治愈的机会。随着临床和学术对该领域兴趣的增加,结果报告的异质性阻碍了有效和有意义的数据合成到高质量的荟萃分析中。本系统综述的目的是调查结肠直肠腹膜转移患者在接受或不接受腹腔化疗的细胞减少手术后结果报告的可变性。方法:检索2000年至2023年10月期间的5个电子数据库[MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库(Central)和护理与相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)],以确定当前文献中报道的所有结局。提取的结果由一个多学科工作组编目和审查到标准化的术语和领域。结果:从筛选的5112项研究中,共有294项研究被纳入分析。我们从纳入的研究中逐字提取了2903个结果,并将其分为7个结果域的85个标准化结果。最常报道的领域是生存(274项(93%)研究)和病理结果(232项(79%)研究)。与功能和生命影响相关的结果仅在7项(2%)研究中报告。报告的结果仅在35%的病例中有定义,并且定义之间存在显著差异。结论:本系统综述强调了结肠直肠腹膜转移的细胞减少手术后结果测量和报告的异质性。在目前的文献中,患者报告的结果相对较少。这次审查的结果将为国际合作努力提供信息,以创建解决这些问题的核心成果集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Colorectal Disease
Colorectal Disease 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
406
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Diseases of the colon and rectum are common and offer a number of exciting challenges. Clinical, diagnostic and basic science research is expanding rapidly. There is increasing demand from purchasers of health care and patients for clinicians to keep abreast of the latest research and developments, and to translate these into routine practice. Technological advances in diagnosis, surgical technique, new pharmaceuticals, molecular genetics and other basic sciences have transformed many aspects of how these diseases are managed. Such progress will accelerate. Colorectal Disease offers a real benefit to subscribers and authors. It is first and foremost a vehicle for publishing original research relating to the demanding, rapidly expanding field of colorectal diseases. Essential for surgeons, pathologists, oncologists, gastroenterologists and health professionals caring for patients with a disease of the lower GI tract, Colorectal Disease furthers education and inter-professional development by including regular review articles and discussions of current controversies. Note that the journal does not usually accept paediatric surgical papers.
期刊最新文献
Patient perspectives of shared decision-making in emergency surgery. Impact of hospital volume on survival in patients with locally advanced colon cancer - A Dutch population-based study. Innovative application of the Versius Surgical System® in subtotal colectomy for refractory slow-transit constipation: A video vignette. Robotic right hemicolectomy with CME and omentectomy, HIPEC and right parietal peritonectomy - A video vignette. Chronic pain after colorectal cancer treatment: A population-based cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1