Medial and Lateral Meniscus Root Tear: Etiopathogenesis and Morphological Pattern in Indian Population.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-12-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s43465-024-01297-y
Ravi Gupta, Varun Phogat, Ritesh Khokkhar, Anil Kapoor
{"title":"Medial and Lateral Meniscus Root Tear: Etiopathogenesis and Morphological Pattern in Indian Population.","authors":"Ravi Gupta, Varun Phogat, Ritesh Khokkhar, Anil Kapoor","doi":"10.1007/s43465-024-01297-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to enhance our understanding of the morphological pattern, causes and pathogenesis of meniscal root injuries in the Indian population.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty-four patients with meniscus root tears were included in the study. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the location of the meniscus tear: Group 1 (<i>n</i> = 41) comprised patients with lateral meniscus root injury (LMRI), and Group 2 (<i>n</i> = 23) included patients with medial meniscus root injury (MMRI). Demographic and patient-specific data, such as age, gender, BMI, history of injury, and injury type, were recorded. All patients underwent surgical treatment, and intraoperative findings (chondral damage grade, type of root injury, associated ligamentous injuries) were documented. Meniscus root tears are further classified into 5 categories depending upon their morphological types. A minimum 12-month follow-up assessed functional outcomes using the Lysholm and IKDC knee scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age for MMRI and LMRI was 50.3 years and 29.4 years, respectively. In the MMRI group, 48% (11/23) were female compared to only 15% (6/41) in the LMRI group. The mean BMI in the MMRI and LMRI groups was 30.1 and 25.4, respectively. Nine patients in MMRI and 4 patients in LMRI group exhibited grade 3 or higher chondral damage. Type 2 meniscus root tear was most common type in both the groups (51% in MMRI vs. 74% in LMRI). Both LMRI and MMRI groups demonstrated significant improvement in functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medial meniscus root injuries predominantly occur in the elderly without a significant history of trauma, often associated with a high grade of medial femoral chondral damage, suggesting a degenerative etiology. In contrast, lateral meniscus root injuries tend to occur in younger patients with a notable history of knee injury, indicative of a traumatic etiology for LMRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":"59 1","pages":"115-120"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11680528/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01297-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to enhance our understanding of the morphological pattern, causes and pathogenesis of meniscal root injuries in the Indian population.

Materials and methods: Sixty-four patients with meniscus root tears were included in the study. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the location of the meniscus tear: Group 1 (n = 41) comprised patients with lateral meniscus root injury (LMRI), and Group 2 (n = 23) included patients with medial meniscus root injury (MMRI). Demographic and patient-specific data, such as age, gender, BMI, history of injury, and injury type, were recorded. All patients underwent surgical treatment, and intraoperative findings (chondral damage grade, type of root injury, associated ligamentous injuries) were documented. Meniscus root tears are further classified into 5 categories depending upon their morphological types. A minimum 12-month follow-up assessed functional outcomes using the Lysholm and IKDC knee scores.

Results: The mean age for MMRI and LMRI was 50.3 years and 29.4 years, respectively. In the MMRI group, 48% (11/23) were female compared to only 15% (6/41) in the LMRI group. The mean BMI in the MMRI and LMRI groups was 30.1 and 25.4, respectively. Nine patients in MMRI and 4 patients in LMRI group exhibited grade 3 or higher chondral damage. Type 2 meniscus root tear was most common type in both the groups (51% in MMRI vs. 74% in LMRI). Both LMRI and MMRI groups demonstrated significant improvement in functional outcomes.

Conclusions: Medial meniscus root injuries predominantly occur in the elderly without a significant history of trauma, often associated with a high grade of medial femoral chondral damage, suggesting a degenerative etiology. In contrast, lateral meniscus root injuries tend to occur in younger patients with a notable history of knee injury, indicative of a traumatic etiology for LMRI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内侧和外侧半月板根撕裂:印度人群的发病机制和形态模式。
目的:本研究旨在提高我们对印度人群半月板根损伤的形态学模式、原因和发病机制的认识。材料与方法:选取64例半月板根撕裂患者作为研究对象。根据半月板撕裂位置将患者分为两组:1组(n = 41)包括外侧半月板根损伤(LMRI)患者,2组(n = 23)包括内侧半月板根损伤(MMRI)患者。记录人口统计学和患者特异性数据,如年龄、性别、BMI、损伤史和损伤类型。所有患者均接受手术治疗,并记录术中发现(软骨损伤等级、根损伤类型、相关韧带损伤)。半月板根部撕裂根据其形态类型可进一步分为5类。至少12个月的随访使用Lysholm和IKDC膝关节评分评估功能结局。结果:MMRI和LMRI的平均年龄分别为50.3岁和29.4岁。在MMRI组中,48%(11/23)为女性,而在LMRI组中仅为15%(6/41)。MMRI组和LMRI组的平均BMI分别为30.1和25.4。MMRI组9例、LMRI组4例出现3级及以上软骨损伤。2型半月板根撕裂是两组中最常见的类型(MMRI为51%,LMRI为74%)。LMRI组和MMRI组均表现出功能预后的显著改善。结论:内侧半月板根损伤主要发生在没有明显外伤史的老年人中,通常伴有高度的股骨内侧软骨损伤,提示其病因是退行性的。相反,外侧半月板根损伤往往发生在有明显膝关节损伤史的年轻患者身上,这表明LMRI的创伤病因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of 1 Week Accelerated Ponseti and Standard Ponseti Technique for Management of Idiopathic Congenital Talipes Equinovarus Deformity in Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Functional Outcomes in Aseptic Humeral Shaft Nonunion Treated With Plate Osteosynthesis: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Oral Versus Injectable Vitamin D Therapy for Treating Nutritional Rickets in Indian Children: A Comparative Study. Study of Factors Affecting the Clinical and Radiological Outcome in Management of Infected Non-Union of Tibia Managed with Ilizarov Ring Fixator and its Correlation with Patient-Reported Outcome: Prospective Descriptive Study. Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Factors Related to the Diagnosis and Characteristics of Selective Screening for its Detection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1