Racial Disparities in the Use of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-29 DOI:10.1002/jso.28051
Andrei Gurau, Olivia Monton, Jonathan B Greer, Norman G Nicolson, Fabian M Johnston
{"title":"Racial Disparities in the Use of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer.","authors":"Andrei Gurau, Olivia Monton, Jonathan B Greer, Norman G Nicolson, Fabian M Johnston","doi":"10.1002/jso.28051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Racial disparities in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) utilization across gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are not well characterized. We evaluated racial/ethnic disparities in the use of MIS approaches and associated outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed a cohort of patients with GI cancer in the National Cancer Database (2010-2020). Multinomial logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between race/ethnicity and approach. Logistic regression was used to assess 30-day readmission and 90-day mortality. Cox regression was used to analyze overall survival. Models were adjusted for demographics, clinical characteristics, cancer factors, and facility features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 839 398 patients included, 76.9% were White, 11.6% Black, 6.6% Hispanic/Latino, 4.0% Asian, and 0.3% Indigenous. Compared with patients of White race, the odds of robotic surgery were lower for Black (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.86-0.93) and Indigenous patients (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.59-0.89), but higher for Hispanic/Latino (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.08-1.17) and Asian patients (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.21-1.34). Indigenous patients had higher odds of readmission (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.23-1.62), 90-day mortality (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.11-1.54), and worse overall survival (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.05-1.18).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Indigenous and Black patients have lower utilization of minimally invasive approaches and worse outcomes in GI cancer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.28051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Racial disparities in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) utilization across gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are not well characterized. We evaluated racial/ethnic disparities in the use of MIS approaches and associated outcomes.

Methods: We analyzed a cohort of patients with GI cancer in the National Cancer Database (2010-2020). Multinomial logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between race/ethnicity and approach. Logistic regression was used to assess 30-day readmission and 90-day mortality. Cox regression was used to analyze overall survival. Models were adjusted for demographics, clinical characteristics, cancer factors, and facility features.

Results: Of the 839 398 patients included, 76.9% were White, 11.6% Black, 6.6% Hispanic/Latino, 4.0% Asian, and 0.3% Indigenous. Compared with patients of White race, the odds of robotic surgery were lower for Black (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.86-0.93) and Indigenous patients (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.59-0.89), but higher for Hispanic/Latino (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.08-1.17) and Asian patients (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.21-1.34). Indigenous patients had higher odds of readmission (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.23-1.62), 90-day mortality (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.11-1.54), and worse overall survival (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.05-1.18).

Conclusion: Indigenous and Black patients have lower utilization of minimally invasive approaches and worse outcomes in GI cancer care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胃肠癌微创手术应用的种族差异。
在胃肠道(GI)癌症中,微创手术(MIS)应用的种族差异尚未得到很好的表征。我们评估了在使用MIS方法和相关结果方面的种族/民族差异。方法:我们分析了国家癌症数据库(2010-2020)中的一组胃肠道肿瘤患者。使用多项逻辑回归来评估种族/民族与方法之间的关联。采用Logistic回归评估30天再入院率和90天死亡率。采用Cox回归分析总生存率。模型根据人口统计学、临床特征、癌症因素和设施特征进行调整。结果:在纳入的839398例患者中,76.9%为白人,11.6%为黑人,6.6%为西班牙裔/拉丁裔,4.0%为亚洲人,0.3%为土著。与白人患者相比,黑人患者(OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.86-0.93)和土著患者(OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.59-0.89)的机器人手术几率较低,但西班牙裔/拉丁裔患者(OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.08-1.17)和亚洲患者(OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.21-1.34)的机器人手术几率较高。本土患者的再入院几率较高(OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.23-1.62), 90天死亡率较高(OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.11-1.54),总生存率较差(HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.05-1.18)。结论:土著和黑人患者在胃肠道肿瘤治疗中微创入路的使用率较低,预后较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Assessment of Challenging Oncologic Cases: A Comparative Analysis Between ChatGPT, Gemini, and a Multidisciplinary Tumor Board. Comment on "Association of Socio-Environmental Burden and Inequality With Cancer Screening and Mortality". Comment on "Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma: Contemporary Trends in Postoperative Outcomes and Patient Selection With Reduced Case Volumes in the Post-MSLT2 Era". Implications of Artificial Intelligence for Colorectal Cancer: Correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1