The efficacy of longer-term lebrikizumab treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis who did not meet protocol-defined response criteria at week 16 in 2 randomized controlled clinical trials

IF 11.8 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jaad.2024.12.026
Emma Guttman-Yassky MD, PhD , David Rosmarin MD , Marjolein de Bruin-Weller MD, PhD , Stephan Weidinger MD, PhD , Thomas Bieber MD, PhD, MDRA , H. Chih-ho Hong MD , Hany Elmaraghy MD , Amber Reck Atwater MD , Evangeline Pierce PhD, MS , Chenjia Xu PhD , Helena Agell BS , Esther Garcia Gil MD , Eric Simpson MD, MCR
{"title":"The efficacy of longer-term lebrikizumab treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis who did not meet protocol-defined response criteria at week 16 in 2 randomized controlled clinical trials","authors":"Emma Guttman-Yassky MD, PhD ,&nbsp;David Rosmarin MD ,&nbsp;Marjolein de Bruin-Weller MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Stephan Weidinger MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Thomas Bieber MD, PhD, MDRA ,&nbsp;H. Chih-ho Hong MD ,&nbsp;Hany Elmaraghy MD ,&nbsp;Amber Reck Atwater MD ,&nbsp;Evangeline Pierce PhD, MS ,&nbsp;Chenjia Xu PhD ,&nbsp;Helena Agell BS ,&nbsp;Esther Garcia Gil MD ,&nbsp;Eric Simpson MD, MCR","doi":"10.1016/j.jaad.2024.12.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Lebrikizumab demonstrated statistically significant improvements in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis at week 16 with a durable response up to week 52.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the efficacy of lebrikizumab-treated patients at 52 weeks who did not achieve the ADvocate1 and ADvocate2 protocol-defined response criteria (≥75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI 75] or Investigator Global Assessment 0/1 with ≥2-point improvement without rescue medication) after 16 weeks.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This analysis includes observed data for patients who received lebrikizumab every 2 weeks during the induction period, did not achieve the protocol-defined response, and subsequently received open-label lebrikizumab treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At week 16, 38.1% of lebrikizumab-treated patients entered the escape arm due to not achieving the response criteria. However, most of these patients had achieved ≥50% improvement in EASI (58.1%) by week 16. At week 52, 36.1% achieved Investigator Global Assessment 0/1 with ≥2-point improvement, 75.5% achieved EASI 75, 44.2% achieved ≥90% improvement in EASI, and 66.4% reported ≥4-point Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale improvement.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>This analysis assesses patients receiving open-label treatment with concomitant topical therapy allowed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Lebrikizumab-treated patients not achieving the protocol-defined response at week 16 can benefit from the continuation of longer-term therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology","volume":"92 5","pages":"Pages 1024-1031"},"PeriodicalIF":11.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190962224034145","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Lebrikizumab demonstrated statistically significant improvements in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis at week 16 with a durable response up to week 52.

Objective

To investigate the efficacy of lebrikizumab-treated patients at 52 weeks who did not achieve the ADvocate1 and ADvocate2 protocol-defined response criteria (≥75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI 75] or Investigator Global Assessment 0/1 with ≥2-point improvement without rescue medication) after 16 weeks.

Methods

This analysis includes observed data for patients who received lebrikizumab every 2 weeks during the induction period, did not achieve the protocol-defined response, and subsequently received open-label lebrikizumab treatment.

Results

At week 16, 38.1% of lebrikizumab-treated patients entered the escape arm due to not achieving the response criteria. However, most of these patients had achieved ≥50% improvement in EASI (58.1%) by week 16. At week 52, 36.1% achieved Investigator Global Assessment 0/1 with ≥2-point improvement, 75.5% achieved EASI 75, 44.2% achieved ≥90% improvement in EASI, and 66.4% reported ≥4-point Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale improvement.

Limitations

This analysis assesses patients receiving open-label treatment with concomitant topical therapy allowed.

Conclusion

Lebrikizumab-treated patients not achieving the protocol-defined response at week 16 can benefit from the continuation of longer-term therapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在两项随机对照临床试验中,中重度特应性皮炎患者在第16周未达到方案定义的反应标准,长期lebrikizumab治疗的疗效。
背景:Lebrikizumab在第16周对中度至重度特应性皮炎患者有统计学显著改善,持续缓解至第52周。目的:研究未达到ADvocate1和ADvocate2协议定义的缓解标准(湿疹面积和严重程度指数[EASI 75]改善≥75%或研究者全球评估[IGA] 0/1,改善≥2分,无救助药物)的患者在52周时的疗效。方法:本分析包括在诱导期每2周接受lebrikizumab治疗的患者的观察数据,这些患者未达到方案定义的应答,随后接受开放标签lebrikizumab治疗。结果:在第16周,38.1%的lebrikizumab治疗患者由于未达到应答标准而进入逃逸组。然而,大多数患者在第16周时EASI改善≥50%(58.1%)。在第52周,36.1%达到IGA 0/1,改善≥2分,75.5%达到EASI 75分,44.2%达到EASI≥90%,66.4%报告瘙痒症数值评定量表改善≥4分。局限性:本分析评估了接受开放标签治疗的患者,同时允许局部治疗。结论:lebrikizumab治疗的患者在第16周未达到协议定义的反应,可以从继续长期治疗中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
5.80%
发文量
2023
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (JAAD) is the official scientific publication of the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD). Its primary goal is to cater to the educational requirements of the dermatology community. Being the top journal in the field, JAAD publishes original articles that have undergone peer review. These articles primarily focus on clinical, investigative, and population-based studies related to dermatology. Another key area of emphasis is research on healthcare delivery and quality of care. JAAD also highlights high-quality, cost-effective, and innovative treatments within the field. In addition to this, the journal covers new diagnostic techniques and various other topics relevant to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of skin, hair, and nail disorders.
期刊最新文献
Frontal fibrosing alopecia part II: Etiopathogenesis and management. Frontal fibrosing alopecia part I - Diagnosis and clinical presentation. Letter from the editor: Desmoplastic melanoma behaves differently from other melanomas-American Joint Committee on Cancer staging should differ. Baker's rack for surgical tray organization. Artificial intelligence in dermatology: Ethical dilemmas and diagnostic decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1