Optimising Venturi flume oxygen transfer efficiency using uncertainty-aware decision trees.

IF 2.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Water Science and Technology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.2166/wst.2024.393
Nand Kumar Tiwari, Dinesh Panwar
{"title":"Optimising Venturi flume oxygen transfer efficiency using uncertainty-aware decision trees.","authors":"Nand Kumar Tiwari, Dinesh Panwar","doi":"10.2166/wst.2024.393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study optimizes standard oxygen transfer efficiency (SOTE) in Venturi flumes investigating the impact of key parameters such as discharge per unit width (<i>q</i>), throat width (<i>W</i>), throat length (<i>F</i>), upstream entrance width (<i>E</i>), and gauge readings (<i>H<sub>a</sub></i> and <i>H<sub>b</sub></i>). To achieve this, a comprehensive experimental dataset was analyzed using multiple linear regression (MLR), multiple nonlinear regression (MNLR), gradient boosting machine (GBM), extreme gradient boosting (XRT), random forest (RF), M5 (pruned and unpruned), random tree (RT), and reduced error pruning (REP). Model performance was evaluated based on key metrics: correlation coefficient (CC), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE). Among the proposed models, M5_Unprun emerged as the top performer, exhibiting the highest CC (0.9455), the lowest RMSE (0.1918), and the lowest MAE (0.0030). GBM followed closely with a CC value of 0.9372, an RMSE value of 0.2067, and an MAE value of 0.0006. Uncertainty analysis further solidified the superior performance of M5_Unpruned (0.7522) and GBM (0.8055), with narrower prediction bands compared to other models, including MLR, which exhibited the widest band (1.4320). One-way analysis of variance confirmed the reliability and robustness of the proposed models. Sensitivity, correlation, and SHapley Additive exPlanations analyses identified <i>W</i> and <i>H<sub>b</sub></i> as the most influencing factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":23653,"journal":{"name":"Water Science and Technology","volume":"90 12","pages":"3210-3240"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2024.393","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study optimizes standard oxygen transfer efficiency (SOTE) in Venturi flumes investigating the impact of key parameters such as discharge per unit width (q), throat width (W), throat length (F), upstream entrance width (E), and gauge readings (Ha and Hb). To achieve this, a comprehensive experimental dataset was analyzed using multiple linear regression (MLR), multiple nonlinear regression (MNLR), gradient boosting machine (GBM), extreme gradient boosting (XRT), random forest (RF), M5 (pruned and unpruned), random tree (RT), and reduced error pruning (REP). Model performance was evaluated based on key metrics: correlation coefficient (CC), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE). Among the proposed models, M5_Unprun emerged as the top performer, exhibiting the highest CC (0.9455), the lowest RMSE (0.1918), and the lowest MAE (0.0030). GBM followed closely with a CC value of 0.9372, an RMSE value of 0.2067, and an MAE value of 0.0006. Uncertainty analysis further solidified the superior performance of M5_Unpruned (0.7522) and GBM (0.8055), with narrower prediction bands compared to other models, including MLR, which exhibited the widest band (1.4320). One-way analysis of variance confirmed the reliability and robustness of the proposed models. Sensitivity, correlation, and SHapley Additive exPlanations analyses identified W and Hb as the most influencing factors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用不确定性感知决策树优化文丘里水槽氧传递效率。
本研究优化了文丘里水槽的标准氧传递效率(SOTE),研究了单位宽度流量(q)、喉道宽度(W)、喉道长度(F)、上游入口宽度(E)和仪表读数(Ha和Hb)等关键参数的影响。为此,利用多元线性回归(MLR)、多元非线性回归(MNLR)、梯度增强机(GBM)、极端梯度增强(XRT)、随机森林(RF)、M5(修剪和未修剪)、随机树(RT)和减少误差修剪(REP)对一个综合实验数据集进行了分析。根据相关系数(CC)、均方根误差(RMSE)和平均绝对误差(MAE)等关键指标评估模型的性能。其中,M5_Unprun模型表现最佳,CC最高(0.9455),RMSE最低(0.1918),MAE最低(0.0030)。GBM紧随其后,CC值为0.9372,RMSE值为0.2067,MAE值为0.0006。不确定性分析进一步巩固了M5_Unpruned(0.7522)和GBM(0.8055)的优越性能,与其他模型相比,其预测频带较窄,其中MLR的预测频带最宽(1.4320)。单因素方差分析证实了模型的可靠性和稳健性。敏感性、相关性和SHapley加性解释分析发现,W和Hb是影响最大的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Water Science and Technology
Water Science and Technology 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
366
审稿时长
4.4 months
期刊介绍: Water Science and Technology publishes peer-reviewed papers on all aspects of the science and technology of water and wastewater. Papers are selected by a rigorous peer review procedure with the aim of rapid and wide dissemination of research results, development and application of new techniques, and related managerial and policy issues. Scientists, engineers, consultants, managers and policy-makers will find this journal essential as a permanent record of progress of research activities and their practical applications.
期刊最新文献
Calibrating the Priestley-Taylor model for evapotranspiration across different substrate depths in green roofs. Corrigendum: Water Science and Technology: Uncertainty in Evapotranspiration Inputs Impacts Hydrological Modeling, Mehnaza Akhter, et al. Development of a process model and life cycle assessment for a large water resource recovery facility and comparison of biosolids process upgrade options. Evaluation of hydraulic retention time on hydrogen production from corn industry wastewater by dark fermentation. Seawater intrusion and infiltration modelling coupled to digital tools to avoid high saline concentrations in reclaimed water: application in coastal central Italy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1