Illnesses Associated With Increased Length of Stay for Individuals Experiencing Homelessness: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalisations
S. Monty Ghosh, Khokan C. Sikdar, Adetola Koleade, Jordan Ross, William Rioux, Eddy S. Lang, Geoff Messier, Robert Tanguay, Stephen E. Congly, Stephanie Van den Berg, Karen L. Tang
{"title":"Illnesses Associated With Increased Length of Stay for Individuals Experiencing Homelessness: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalisations","authors":"S. Monty Ghosh, Khokan C. Sikdar, Adetola Koleade, Jordan Ross, William Rioux, Eddy S. Lang, Geoff Messier, Robert Tanguay, Stephen E. Congly, Stephanie Van den Berg, Karen L. Tang","doi":"10.1111/jep.14236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Individuals experiencing homelessness (IEH) tend to have increased length of stay (LOS) in acute care settings, which negatively impacts health care costs and resource utilisation. It is unclear however, what specific factors account for this increased LOS. This study attempts to define which diagnoses most impact LOS for IEH and if there are differences based on their demographics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective cohort study was conducted looking at ICD-10 diagnosis codes and LOS for patients identified as IEH seen in Emergency Departments (ED) and also for those admitted to hospital. Data were stratified based on diagnosis, gender, and age. Statistical analysis was conducted to determine which ICD-10 diagnoses were significantly associated with increased ED and inpatient LOS for IEH compared to housed individuals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Homelessness was associated with increased LOS regardless of gender or age group. The absolute mean difference of LOS between IEH and housed individuals was 1.62 h [95% CI 1.49–1.75] in the ED and 3.02 days [95% CI 2.42–3.62] for inpatients. Males age 18–24 years spent on average 7.12 more days in hospital, and females aged 25–34 spent 7.32 more days in hospital compared to their housed counterparts. Thirty-one diagnoses were associated with increased LOS in EDs for IEH compared to their housed counterparts; maternity concerns and coronary artery disease were associated with significantly increased inpatient LOS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Homelessness significantly increases the LOS of individuals within both ED and inpatient settings. We have identified several diagnoses that are associated with increased LOS in IE; these should inform the prioritisation and development of targeted interventions to improve the health of IEH.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11682563/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.14236","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Individuals experiencing homelessness (IEH) tend to have increased length of stay (LOS) in acute care settings, which negatively impacts health care costs and resource utilisation. It is unclear however, what specific factors account for this increased LOS. This study attempts to define which diagnoses most impact LOS for IEH and if there are differences based on their demographics.
Methods
A retrospective cohort study was conducted looking at ICD-10 diagnosis codes and LOS for patients identified as IEH seen in Emergency Departments (ED) and also for those admitted to hospital. Data were stratified based on diagnosis, gender, and age. Statistical analysis was conducted to determine which ICD-10 diagnoses were significantly associated with increased ED and inpatient LOS for IEH compared to housed individuals.
Results
Homelessness was associated with increased LOS regardless of gender or age group. The absolute mean difference of LOS between IEH and housed individuals was 1.62 h [95% CI 1.49–1.75] in the ED and 3.02 days [95% CI 2.42–3.62] for inpatients. Males age 18–24 years spent on average 7.12 more days in hospital, and females aged 25–34 spent 7.32 more days in hospital compared to their housed counterparts. Thirty-one diagnoses were associated with increased LOS in EDs for IEH compared to their housed counterparts; maternity concerns and coronary artery disease were associated with significantly increased inpatient LOS.
Conclusion
Homelessness significantly increases the LOS of individuals within both ED and inpatient settings. We have identified several diagnoses that are associated with increased LOS in IE; these should inform the prioritisation and development of targeted interventions to improve the health of IEH.
背景:经历无家可归(IEH)的个人往往在急性护理机构的停留时间(LOS)更长,这对医疗保健成本和资源利用产生负面影响。然而,目前尚不清楚是什么具体因素导致了LOS的增加。本研究试图确定哪些诊断对IEH的LOS影响最大,以及是否存在基于人口统计学的差异。方法:进行了一项回顾性队列研究,研究了在急诊科(ED)和住院的确诊为IEH的患者的ICD-10诊断代码和LOS。根据诊断、性别和年龄对数据进行分层。进行了统计分析,以确定哪些ICD-10诊断与IEH住院患者的ED和LOS增加显著相关。结果:无论性别或年龄组,无家可归与LOS增加有关。IEH和住院患者LOS的绝对平均差异在ED组为1.62 h [95% CI 1.49-1.75],在住院组为3.02 d [95% CI 2.42-3.62]。18-24岁的男性平均住院天数比住在家里的男性多7.12天,25-34岁的女性平均住院天数比住在家里的女性多7.32天。与住院者相比,31例诊断与IEH急诊科的LOS增加有关;产妇担忧和冠状动脉疾病与住院患者LOS显著增加相关。结论:无家可归显著增加了急诊科和住院病人的LOS。我们已经确定了几种与IE中LOS增加相关的诊断;这些应为确定优先次序和制定有针对性的干预措施提供信息,以改善IEH的健康。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.