İlknur Deliktaş Onur, Tuğba Başoğlu, Nazım Can Demircan, Tuğba Akin Telli, Rukiye Arikan, Özlem Ercelep, Nazım Serdar Turhal, Mehmet Akif Öztürk, Perran Fulden Yumuk, Faysal Dane
{"title":"Evaluating the performance of the MSKCC gastric cancer survival calculator in the Turkish population.","authors":"İlknur Deliktaş Onur, Tuğba Başoğlu, Nazım Can Demircan, Tuğba Akin Telli, Rukiye Arikan, Özlem Ercelep, Nazım Serdar Turhal, Mehmet Akif Öztürk, Perran Fulden Yumuk, Faysal Dane","doi":"10.55730/1300-0144.5901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomogram was developed to predict survivorship in gastric cancer patients undergoing R0 resection. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive power of this nomogram in the Turkish patient population.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Gastric cancer patients over 18 years of age who were admitted to our clinic between 2000 and 2019 and underwent primary curative surgery and R0 resection were included in the study. The 5- and 9-year overall survival (OS) rates of 489 patients were analyzed. Real-life survival rates and those calculated using the MSKCC tool were compared in all the patients and subgroups. The relationship between the variables and survival were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 5-year median observed OS rate for all the patients was 51.7%, while the 5-year median OS rate calculated using the MSKCC tool was 48.5%. The difference between the expected and observed survival rates was 3.2%. The rates were similar and there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.31). The 9-year median observed OS rate for all the patients was 41.4%, while the 5-year median OS rate calculated using the MSKCC tool was 41%. The difference between the expected and observed survival rates was 0.4%. The rates were similar and there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.9).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 5- and 9-year survival rates estimated using the MSKCC tool were correlated with the 5- and 9-year survival rates in the real-life data. Hence, the use of the MSKCC prognostic tool in clinical practice should be expanded.</p>","PeriodicalId":23361,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"54 6","pages":"1205-1214"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11673615/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5901","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/aim: The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomogram was developed to predict survivorship in gastric cancer patients undergoing R0 resection. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive power of this nomogram in the Turkish patient population.
Materials and methods: Gastric cancer patients over 18 years of age who were admitted to our clinic between 2000 and 2019 and underwent primary curative surgery and R0 resection were included in the study. The 5- and 9-year overall survival (OS) rates of 489 patients were analyzed. Real-life survival rates and those calculated using the MSKCC tool were compared in all the patients and subgroups. The relationship between the variables and survival were analyzed.
Results: The 5-year median observed OS rate for all the patients was 51.7%, while the 5-year median OS rate calculated using the MSKCC tool was 48.5%. The difference between the expected and observed survival rates was 3.2%. The rates were similar and there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.31). The 9-year median observed OS rate for all the patients was 41.4%, while the 5-year median OS rate calculated using the MSKCC tool was 41%. The difference between the expected and observed survival rates was 0.4%. The rates were similar and there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.9).
Conclusion: The 5- and 9-year survival rates estimated using the MSKCC tool were correlated with the 5- and 9-year survival rates in the real-life data. Hence, the use of the MSKCC prognostic tool in clinical practice should be expanded.
期刊介绍:
Turkish Journal of Medical sciences is a peer-reviewed comprehensive resource that provides critical up-to-date information on the broad spectrum of general medical sciences. The Journal intended to publish original medical scientific papers regarding the priority based on the prominence, significance, and timeliness of the findings. However since the audience of the Journal is not limited to any subspeciality in a wide variety of medical disciplines, the papers focusing on the technical details of a given medical subspeciality may not be evaluated for publication.