Evaluating the performance of the MSKCC gastric cancer survival calculator in the Turkish population.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.55730/1300-0144.5901
İlknur Deliktaş Onur, Tuğba Başoğlu, Nazım Can Demircan, Tuğba Akin Telli, Rukiye Arikan, Özlem Ercelep, Nazım Serdar Turhal, Mehmet Akif Öztürk, Perran Fulden Yumuk, Faysal Dane
{"title":"Evaluating the performance of the MSKCC gastric cancer survival calculator in the Turkish population.","authors":"İlknur Deliktaş Onur, Tuğba Başoğlu, Nazım Can Demircan, Tuğba Akin Telli, Rukiye Arikan, Özlem Ercelep, Nazım Serdar Turhal, Mehmet Akif Öztürk, Perran Fulden Yumuk, Faysal Dane","doi":"10.55730/1300-0144.5901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomogram was developed to predict survivorship in gastric cancer patients undergoing R0 resection. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive power of this nomogram in the Turkish patient population.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Gastric cancer patients over 18 years of age who were admitted to our clinic between 2000 and 2019 and underwent primary curative surgery and R0 resection were included in the study. The 5- and 9-year overall survival (OS) rates of 489 patients were analyzed. Real-life survival rates and those calculated using the MSKCC tool were compared in all the patients and subgroups. The relationship between the variables and survival were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 5-year median observed OS rate for all the patients was 51.7%, while the 5-year median OS rate calculated using the MSKCC tool was 48.5%. The difference between the expected and observed survival rates was 3.2%. The rates were similar and there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.31). The 9-year median observed OS rate for all the patients was 41.4%, while the 5-year median OS rate calculated using the MSKCC tool was 41%. The difference between the expected and observed survival rates was 0.4%. The rates were similar and there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.9).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 5- and 9-year survival rates estimated using the MSKCC tool were correlated with the 5- and 9-year survival rates in the real-life data. Hence, the use of the MSKCC prognostic tool in clinical practice should be expanded.</p>","PeriodicalId":23361,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"54 6","pages":"1205-1214"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11673615/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5901","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomogram was developed to predict survivorship in gastric cancer patients undergoing R0 resection. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive power of this nomogram in the Turkish patient population.

Materials and methods: Gastric cancer patients over 18 years of age who were admitted to our clinic between 2000 and 2019 and underwent primary curative surgery and R0 resection were included in the study. The 5- and 9-year overall survival (OS) rates of 489 patients were analyzed. Real-life survival rates and those calculated using the MSKCC tool were compared in all the patients and subgroups. The relationship between the variables and survival were analyzed.

Results: The 5-year median observed OS rate for all the patients was 51.7%, while the 5-year median OS rate calculated using the MSKCC tool was 48.5%. The difference between the expected and observed survival rates was 3.2%. The rates were similar and there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.31). The 9-year median observed OS rate for all the patients was 41.4%, while the 5-year median OS rate calculated using the MSKCC tool was 41%. The difference between the expected and observed survival rates was 0.4%. The rates were similar and there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.9).

Conclusion: The 5- and 9-year survival rates estimated using the MSKCC tool were correlated with the 5- and 9-year survival rates in the real-life data. Hence, the use of the MSKCC prognostic tool in clinical practice should be expanded.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估土耳其人群中MSKCC胃癌生存计算器的性能。
背景/目的:纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心(MSKCC) nomogram (nomogram)用于预测胃癌R0切除术患者的生存率。本研究旨在评估该nomogram在土耳其患者群体中的预测能力。材料与方法:本研究纳入2000年至2019年期间我院收治的18岁以上的胃癌患者,并进行了一期治愈性手术和R0切除术。分析489例患者的5年和9年总生存率。将所有患者和亚组的实际生存率与使用MSKCC工具计算的生存率进行比较。分析各变量与生存率的关系。结果:所有患者的5年中位观察OS率为51.7%,而使用MSKCC工具计算的5年中位OS率为48.5%。预期生存率与观察生存率的差异为3.2%。两组发生率相近,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.31)。所有患者的9年中位观察OS率为41.4%,而使用MSKCC工具计算的5年中位OS率为41%。预期生存率与观察生存率的差异为0.4%。发生率相似,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.9)。结论:使用MSKCC工具估计的5年和9年生存率与实际数据中的5年和9年生存率相关。因此,在临床实践中应扩大MSKCC预后工具的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Turkish Journal of Medical sciences is a peer-reviewed comprehensive resource that provides critical up-to-date information on the broad spectrum of general medical sciences. The Journal intended to publish original medical scientific papers regarding the priority based on the prominence, significance, and timeliness of the findings. However since the audience of the Journal is not limited to any subspeciality in a wide variety of medical disciplines, the papers focusing on the technical  details of a given medical  subspeciality may not be evaluated for publication.
期刊最新文献
Hematological diseases and the heart. Transition of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus from pediatric to adult-oriented rheumatology care. Evaluation of single-layer versus double-layer suturing of low transverse uterine incisions in cesarean section and follow-up of scars by ultrasound: a prospective randomized controlled study. The difference between clinical significance and statistical significance: an important distinction for clinical research. Cardiac effects and comorbidities of neurological diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1