Implementation of written asthma action plan among asthma patients in Türkiye: a multicenter, cross-sectional, descriptive study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.55730/1300-0144.5910
Kurtuluş Aksu, Gürgün Tuğçe Vural Solak, Pınar Mutlu, Levent Cem Mutlu, Görkem Vayişoğlu Şahin, Burcu Yormaz, Aylin Çapraz, Ezgi Erdem Türe, Yavuzalp Solak, Funda Aksu
{"title":"Implementation of written asthma action plan among asthma patients in Türkiye: a multicenter, cross-sectional, descriptive study.","authors":"Kurtuluş Aksu, Gürgün Tuğçe Vural Solak, Pınar Mutlu, Levent Cem Mutlu, Görkem Vayişoğlu Şahin, Burcu Yormaz, Aylin Çapraz, Ezgi Erdem Türe, Yavuzalp Solak, Funda Aksu","doi":"10.55730/1300-0144.5910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>There is currently no data from Türkiye on whether, following a diagnosis of asthma, patients are given an asthma action plan to implement. There is also no data on whether patients can manage their treatment based on the provided asthma action plans. The present study aimed to determine the use of asthma action plans in Türkiye and the awareness levels of patients about these plans.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A multicenter, cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in the outpatient immunology, allergy, and pulmonology clinics of secondary and tertiary healthcare centers. Adult asthmatics filled out a case registration form regarding age, sex, educational status, duration of asthma, and smoking history. Subjects answered the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) assessment of control questions, indicated whether they had previously been offered an asthma action plan, and if they had received one, whether they benefited from it.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 265 asthmatic adults (mean age: 48.4 years, standard deviation: 13.4 years), including 194 (73.2%) females were analyzed. The asthma of 212 (80.0%) patients was controlled, and was uncontrolled in 53 (20.0%) patients. An asthma action plan had been mentioned to 91 (34.3%) of the 265 patients. Among these 91 patients, 85 (93.4%) had been given a written asthma action plan, and 85 (93.4%) stated that they had benefited from the plan. The rate of being given an asthma action plan was significantly lower for illiterate patients than for patients with any education (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The rate of mentioning an asthma action plan to asthmatic patients is low. However, almost all patients who received an asthma action plan benefitted significantly from the plan. Thus, it is important to give asthmatic patients an action plan, ideally in written form.</p>","PeriodicalId":23361,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"54 6","pages":"1281-1285"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11673651/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5910","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: There is currently no data from Türkiye on whether, following a diagnosis of asthma, patients are given an asthma action plan to implement. There is also no data on whether patients can manage their treatment based on the provided asthma action plans. The present study aimed to determine the use of asthma action plans in Türkiye and the awareness levels of patients about these plans.

Materials and methods: A multicenter, cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in the outpatient immunology, allergy, and pulmonology clinics of secondary and tertiary healthcare centers. Adult asthmatics filled out a case registration form regarding age, sex, educational status, duration of asthma, and smoking history. Subjects answered the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) assessment of control questions, indicated whether they had previously been offered an asthma action plan, and if they had received one, whether they benefited from it.

Results: Data from 265 asthmatic adults (mean age: 48.4 years, standard deviation: 13.4 years), including 194 (73.2%) females were analyzed. The asthma of 212 (80.0%) patients was controlled, and was uncontrolled in 53 (20.0%) patients. An asthma action plan had been mentioned to 91 (34.3%) of the 265 patients. Among these 91 patients, 85 (93.4%) had been given a written asthma action plan, and 85 (93.4%) stated that they had benefited from the plan. The rate of being given an asthma action plan was significantly lower for illiterate patients than for patients with any education (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The rate of mentioning an asthma action plan to asthmatic patients is low. However, almost all patients who received an asthma action plan benefitted significantly from the plan. Thus, it is important to give asthmatic patients an action plan, ideally in written form.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基耶省哮喘患者书面哮喘行动计划的实施:一项多中心、横断面、描述性研究。
背景/目的:目前没有来自 rkiye的数据表明,在诊断出哮喘后,是否给予患者哮喘行动计划来实施。也没有数据表明患者是否可以根据提供的哮喘行动计划管理他们的治疗。本研究旨在确定基耶省哮喘行动计划的使用情况以及患者对这些计划的认识水平。材料和方法:在二级和三级卫生保健中心的门诊免疫学、过敏学和肺病学诊所进行了一项多中心、横断面描述性研究。成年哮喘患者填写了一份关于年龄、性别、教育状况、哮喘持续时间和吸烟史的病例登记表。受试者回答了全球哮喘倡议(GINA)控制问题的评估,表明他们之前是否被提供了哮喘行动计划,如果他们收到了,他们是否从中受益。结果:265例成人哮喘患者(平均年龄48.4岁,标准差13.4岁),其中女性194例(73.2%)。哮喘控制212例(80.0%),未控制53例(20.0%)。265例患者中有91例(34.3%)提及哮喘行动计划。91例患者中,85例(93.4%)患者获得了书面哮喘行动计划,85例(93.4%)患者表示从该计划中受益。文盲患者获得哮喘行动计划的比率明显低于受过教育的患者(p < 0.001)。结论:哮喘患者提及哮喘行动计划的比例较低。然而,几乎所有接受哮喘行动计划的患者都从该计划中受益匪浅。因此,给哮喘患者一个行动计划是很重要的,最好是书面形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Turkish Journal of Medical sciences is a peer-reviewed comprehensive resource that provides critical up-to-date information on the broad spectrum of general medical sciences. The Journal intended to publish original medical scientific papers regarding the priority based on the prominence, significance, and timeliness of the findings. However since the audience of the Journal is not limited to any subspeciality in a wide variety of medical disciplines, the papers focusing on the technical  details of a given medical  subspeciality may not be evaluated for publication.
期刊最新文献
Hematological diseases and the heart. Transition of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus from pediatric to adult-oriented rheumatology care. Evaluation of single-layer versus double-layer suturing of low transverse uterine incisions in cesarean section and follow-up of scars by ultrasound: a prospective randomized controlled study. The difference between clinical significance and statistical significance: an important distinction for clinical research. Cardiac effects and comorbidities of neurological diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1