Factors Associated with Clinical Pregnancy following Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.

Tawaqualit Abimbola Ottun, Adeniyi Abiodun Adewunmi, Ayokunle Moses Olumodeji, Faosat Olayiwola Jinadu
{"title":"Factors Associated with Clinical Pregnancy following Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Tawaqualit Abimbola Ottun, Adeniyi Abiodun Adewunmi, Ayokunle Moses Olumodeji, Faosat Olayiwola Jinadu","doi":"10.4103/jwas.jwas_148_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over the years, the numbers of centres performing assisted reproductive technology (ART) have increased in urban regions of Africa. We reviewed a 10-year record of ART in a public hospital in a bid to determine the pregnancy rate and identify factors associated with achieving clinical pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, analytical, cross-sectional study of 604 women who had undergone <i>in vitro</i> fertilisation (IVF) or IVF/intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection, over a 10-year period, at the [Institute of Fertility Medicine, Lagos State University Teaching Hospital]. Data were obtained from the medical records of couples who had undergone IVF at the study location and analysed using relevant descriptive and inferential statistics. Regression analysis was used to determine possible predictors of clinical pregnancy outcomes at 95% confidence level and significant <i>P</i> value of <0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical pregnancy rate observed was 23.7%. Women aged ≥35 years of age had 2.9 odds of achieving pregnancy compared to women <35 years of age. The quality of embryo and dose of the follicle-stimulating hormone used were not significantly different when compared in pregnant and non-pregnant women (<i>P</i> = 0.612 vs 0.881). Endometrial preparation techniques, number of embryos transferred, types of embryos transferred, sperm quality, and source of gametes used were not significantly different in pregnant and non-pregnant women. There was a 0.77 odds of achieving pregnancy when a day-5 embryo was used compared to a day-3 embryo (<i>P</i> = 0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, these results emphasise the multifaceted nature of IVF outcomes, urging further research to elucidate the intricate factors influencing success rates in assisted reproduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":73993,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the West African College of Surgeons","volume":"15 1","pages":"37-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11676021/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the West African College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jwas.jwas_148_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Over the years, the numbers of centres performing assisted reproductive technology (ART) have increased in urban regions of Africa. We reviewed a 10-year record of ART in a public hospital in a bid to determine the pregnancy rate and identify factors associated with achieving clinical pregnancy.

Materials and methods: This was a retrospective, analytical, cross-sectional study of 604 women who had undergone in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or IVF/intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection, over a 10-year period, at the [Institute of Fertility Medicine, Lagos State University Teaching Hospital]. Data were obtained from the medical records of couples who had undergone IVF at the study location and analysed using relevant descriptive and inferential statistics. Regression analysis was used to determine possible predictors of clinical pregnancy outcomes at 95% confidence level and significant P value of <0.05.

Results: The clinical pregnancy rate observed was 23.7%. Women aged ≥35 years of age had 2.9 odds of achieving pregnancy compared to women <35 years of age. The quality of embryo and dose of the follicle-stimulating hormone used were not significantly different when compared in pregnant and non-pregnant women (P = 0.612 vs 0.881). Endometrial preparation techniques, number of embryos transferred, types of embryos transferred, sperm quality, and source of gametes used were not significantly different in pregnant and non-pregnant women. There was a 0.77 odds of achieving pregnancy when a day-5 embryo was used compared to a day-3 embryo (P = 0.008).

Conclusion: Overall, these results emphasise the multifaceted nature of IVF outcomes, urging further research to elucidate the intricate factors influencing success rates in assisted reproduction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辅助生殖技术临床妊娠的相关因素:一项横断面比较研究。
背景:多年来,非洲城市地区提供辅助生殖技术(ART)的中心数量有所增加。我们回顾了一家公立医院10年的抗逆转录病毒治疗记录,以确定妊娠率并确定与临床妊娠相关的因素。材料和方法:这是一项回顾性、分析性、横断面研究,在[拉各斯州立大学教学医院生育医学研究所]对604名接受体外受精(IVF)或体外受精/细胞质内精子注射的妇女进行了10年的研究。数据来自在研究地点接受体外受精的夫妇的医疗记录,并使用相关的描述性和推断性统计进行分析。采用回归分析确定临床妊娠结局的可能预测因素,置信水平为95%,P值为显著性,结果:临床妊娠率为23.7%。年龄≥35岁的女性与女性相比,成功怀孕的几率为2.9 (P = 0.612 vs 0.881)。子宫内膜制备技术、移植的胚胎数量、移植的胚胎类型、精子质量和配子来源在孕妇和非孕妇中没有显著差异。与使用第3天胚胎相比,使用第5天胚胎获得妊娠的几率为0.77 (P = 0.008)。结论:总的来说,这些结果强调了体外受精结果的多面性,迫切需要进一步的研究来阐明影响辅助生殖成功率的复杂因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Diagnostic Dilemma of Emphysematous Liver Abscess with Gas under the Diaphragm: A Case Report and Review of Literature. Atypical Variants of Spinal Dysraphism: A Case Series. Calibre Persistent Labial Artery of the Lower Lip: Oral Propranolol as a Novel Agent of Treatment. Case Finding and Management of Childhood Cataracts: The Role of a Child Eye Health Programme in Kaduna State, Nigeria. Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis and Helminthiasis. A Case-Based Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1