Explainable machine learning model for pre-frailty risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults

Chenlin Du, Zeyu Zhang, Baoqin Liu, Zijian Cao, Nan Jiang, Zongjiu Zhang
{"title":"Explainable machine learning model for pre-frailty risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults","authors":"Chenlin Du,&nbsp;Zeyu Zhang,&nbsp;Baoqin Liu,&nbsp;Zijian Cao,&nbsp;Nan Jiang,&nbsp;Zongjiu Zhang","doi":"10.1002/hcs2.120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Frailty in older adults is linked to increased risks and lower quality of life. Pre-frailty, a condition preceding frailty, is intervenable, but its determinants and assessment are challenging. This study aims to develop and validate an explainable machine learning model for pre-frailty risk assessment among community-dwelling older adults.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study included 3141 adults aged 60 or above from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Pre-frailty was characterized by one or two criteria from the physical frailty phenotype scale. We extracted 80 distinct features across seven dimensions to evaluate pre-frailty risk. A model was constructed using recursive feature elimination and a stacking-CatBoost distillation module on 80% of the sample and validated on a separate 20% holdout data set.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The study used data from 2508 community-dwelling older adults (mean age, 67.24 years [range, 60–96]; 1215 [48.44%] females) to develop a pre-frailty risk assessment model. We selected 57 predictive features and built a distilled CatBoost model, which achieved the highest discrimination (AUROC: 0.7560 [95% CI: 0.7169, 0.7928]) on the 20% holdout data set. The living city, BMI, and peak expiratory flow (PEF) were the three most significant contributors to pre-frailty risk. Physical and environmental factors were the top 2 impactful feature dimensions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>An accurate and interpretable pre-frailty risk assessment framework using state-of-the-art machine learning techniques and explanation methods has been developed. Our framework incorporates a wide range of features and determinants, allowing for a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of pre-frailty risk.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100601,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Science","volume":"3 6","pages":"426-437"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11671213/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hcs2.120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Frailty in older adults is linked to increased risks and lower quality of life. Pre-frailty, a condition preceding frailty, is intervenable, but its determinants and assessment are challenging. This study aims to develop and validate an explainable machine learning model for pre-frailty risk assessment among community-dwelling older adults.

Methods

The study included 3141 adults aged 60 or above from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Pre-frailty was characterized by one or two criteria from the physical frailty phenotype scale. We extracted 80 distinct features across seven dimensions to evaluate pre-frailty risk. A model was constructed using recursive feature elimination and a stacking-CatBoost distillation module on 80% of the sample and validated on a separate 20% holdout data set.

Results

The study used data from 2508 community-dwelling older adults (mean age, 67.24 years [range, 60–96]; 1215 [48.44%] females) to develop a pre-frailty risk assessment model. We selected 57 predictive features and built a distilled CatBoost model, which achieved the highest discrimination (AUROC: 0.7560 [95% CI: 0.7169, 0.7928]) on the 20% holdout data set. The living city, BMI, and peak expiratory flow (PEF) were the three most significant contributors to pre-frailty risk. Physical and environmental factors were the top 2 impactful feature dimensions.

Conclusions

An accurate and interpretable pre-frailty risk assessment framework using state-of-the-art machine learning techniques and explanation methods has been developed. Our framework incorporates a wide range of features and determinants, allowing for a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of pre-frailty risk.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可解释的机器学习模型在社区居住的老年人脆弱前风险评估。
背景:老年人的虚弱与风险增加和生活质量降低有关。脆弱前期是脆弱之前的一种状态,是可以干预的,但其决定因素和评估是具有挑战性的。本研究旨在开发和验证一个可解释的机器学习模型,用于社区居住老年人的脆弱性前风险评估。方法:研究对象为3141名来自中国健康与退休纵向研究的60岁及以上成年人。体质脆弱表型量表的一个或两个标准表征了体质脆弱前期。我们从7个维度中提取了80个不同的特征来评估脆弱性前的风险。在80%的样本上使用递归特征消除和stack - catboost蒸馏模块构建模型,并在单独的20%保留数据集上进行验证。结果:该研究使用了2508名社区居住老年人的数据(平均年龄67.24岁[范围60-96岁];1215例(48.44%)女性)建立虚弱前风险评估模型。我们选择了57个预测特征,并建立了一个经过提炼的CatBoost模型,该模型在20%的holdout数据集上获得了最高的判别率(AUROC: 0.7560 [95% CI: 0.7169, 0.7928])。生活城市、BMI和呼气流量峰值(PEF)是导致脆弱前风险的三个最重要因素。物理和环境因素是影响最大的两个特征维度。结论:利用最先进的机器学习技术和解释方法,开发了一个准确且可解释的脆弱性前风险评估框架。我们的框架包含了广泛的特征和决定因素,允许对脆弱前风险进行全面而细致的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Study protocol: A national cross-sectional study on psychology and behavior investigation of Chinese residents in 2023 Caregiving in Asia: Priority areas for research, policy, and practice to support family caregivers Innovative public strategies in response to COVID-19: A review of practices from China Sixty years of ethical evolution: The 2024 revision of the Declaration of Helsinki (DoH)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1