RAD51 testing in patients with early HER2-negative breast cancer and homologous recombination deficiency: post-hoc analysis of the GeparOla trial

IF 10 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Clinical Cancer Research Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-3148
Guillermo Villacampa, Alba Llop-Guevara, Natalie Filmann, Andrea Herencia, Peter A. Fasching, Thomas Karn, Frederik Marmé, Peter Klare, Volkmar Müller, Andrea Stefek, Christian Schem, Christoph Uleer, Tanja Fehm, Gabriele Doering, Elmar Stickeler, Marion van Mackelenbergh, Bärbel Felder, Valentina Nekljudova, Judith Balmaña, Carsten Denkert, Sibylle Loibl, Violeta Serra
{"title":"RAD51 testing in patients with early HER2-negative breast cancer and homologous recombination deficiency: post-hoc analysis of the GeparOla trial","authors":"Guillermo Villacampa, Alba Llop-Guevara, Natalie Filmann, Andrea Herencia, Peter A. Fasching, Thomas Karn, Frederik Marmé, Peter Klare, Volkmar Müller, Andrea Stefek, Christian Schem, Christoph Uleer, Tanja Fehm, Gabriele Doering, Elmar Stickeler, Marion van Mackelenbergh, Bärbel Felder, Valentina Nekljudova, Judith Balmaña, Carsten Denkert, Sibylle Loibl, Violeta Serra","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-3148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The randomized GeparOla trial reported comparable pathological complete response (pCR) rates with neoadjuvant containing olaparib vs. carboplatin treatment. Here, we evaluate the association between functional homologous repair deficiency (HRD) by RAD51 foci and pCR, and the potential of improving patient selection by combining RAD51 and stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs). Patients and methods: This is a post-hoc blinded, biomarker analysis from the randomized GeparOla trial. Patients with early-stage HER2-negative breast cancer and HRD assessed by Myriad myChoice or BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation were randomized 1:1 to receive i) paclitaxel plus olaparib or ii) paclitaxel plus carboplatin, both followed by epirubicin/cyclophosphamide. Functional HRD was predefined as a RAD51 score ≤10% (RAD51-low). Results: Overall, 90/97 (92.8%) samples were evaluable for RAD51 testing and 72/90 (80.0%) were RAD51-low. The pCR rate in patients with RAD51-low tumors was 66.7% (48/72), while it decreased to 22.2% (4/18) in those with RAD51-high. In the multivariable model including clinicopathological factors and treatment, the RAD51 score remained significantly associated with pCR (OR=12.03, 95%CI 2.60–55.73, p=0.002). Patients with RAD51-low and high sTILs in their tumors achieved a pCR rate of 75.0% (27/36). Similar results were observed for olaparib or carboplatin. In the exploratory DFS analysis, no differences were observed between RAD51 groups (high vs. low: HR=0.85, 95% CI 0.25–2.97). Conclusions: In a pre-selected population with HRD according to a genetic test, RAD51 testing identifies patients with different pCR rates under PARPi or platinum-based therapies. Future biomarker-driven studies should consider this information to refine stratification factors and to improve patient selection.","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-3148","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The randomized GeparOla trial reported comparable pathological complete response (pCR) rates with neoadjuvant containing olaparib vs. carboplatin treatment. Here, we evaluate the association between functional homologous repair deficiency (HRD) by RAD51 foci and pCR, and the potential of improving patient selection by combining RAD51 and stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs). Patients and methods: This is a post-hoc blinded, biomarker analysis from the randomized GeparOla trial. Patients with early-stage HER2-negative breast cancer and HRD assessed by Myriad myChoice or BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation were randomized 1:1 to receive i) paclitaxel plus olaparib or ii) paclitaxel plus carboplatin, both followed by epirubicin/cyclophosphamide. Functional HRD was predefined as a RAD51 score ≤10% (RAD51-low). Results: Overall, 90/97 (92.8%) samples were evaluable for RAD51 testing and 72/90 (80.0%) were RAD51-low. The pCR rate in patients with RAD51-low tumors was 66.7% (48/72), while it decreased to 22.2% (4/18) in those with RAD51-high. In the multivariable model including clinicopathological factors and treatment, the RAD51 score remained significantly associated with pCR (OR=12.03, 95%CI 2.60–55.73, p=0.002). Patients with RAD51-low and high sTILs in their tumors achieved a pCR rate of 75.0% (27/36). Similar results were observed for olaparib or carboplatin. In the exploratory DFS analysis, no differences were observed between RAD51 groups (high vs. low: HR=0.85, 95% CI 0.25–2.97). Conclusions: In a pre-selected population with HRD according to a genetic test, RAD51 testing identifies patients with different pCR rates under PARPi or platinum-based therapies. Future biomarker-driven studies should consider this information to refine stratification factors and to improve patient selection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期 HER2 阴性乳腺癌和同源重组缺陷患者的 RAD51 检测:GeparOla 试验的事后分析
目的:随机GeparOla试验报告了含有奥拉帕尼的新辅助治疗与卡铂治疗的病理完全缓解(pCR)率相当。在这里,我们通过RAD51病灶和pCR评估功能性同源修复缺陷(HRD)之间的关系,以及通过RAD51和间质肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(stil)结合来改善患者选择的潜力。患者和方法:这是一项随机GeparOla试验的事后盲法生物标志物分析。通过Myriad myChoice或BRCA1/BRCA2突变评估的早期her2阴性乳腺癌和HRD患者以1:1的比例随机接受i)紫杉醇加奥拉帕尼或ii)紫杉醇加卡铂治疗,随后均接受表柔比星/环磷酰胺治疗。功能性HRD定义为RAD51评分≤10% (RAD51-low)。结果:总体而言,90/97(92.8%)的样品可用于RAD51检测,72/90(80.0%)的样品为低RAD51。低rad51肿瘤的pCR率为66.7%(48/72),高rad51肿瘤的pCR率为22.2%(4/18)。在包括临床病理因素和治疗的多变量模型中,RAD51评分与pCR仍有显著相关性(OR=12.03, 95%CI 2.60 ~ 55.73, p=0.002)。肿瘤中rad51 -低和高水平的患者的pCR率为75.0%(27/36)。奥拉帕尼或卡铂也观察到类似的结果。在探索性DFS分析中,RAD51组间无差异(高与低:HR=0.85, 95% CI 0.25-2.97)。结论:在根据基因检测预先选择的HRD人群中,RAD51检测可识别PARPi或铂基治疗下不同pCR率的患者。未来的生物标志物驱动的研究应该考虑这些信息,以完善分层因素和改善患者选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
20.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
1207
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Cancer Research is a journal focusing on groundbreaking research in cancer, specifically in the areas where the laboratory and the clinic intersect. Our primary interest lies in clinical trials that investigate novel treatments, accompanied by research on pharmacology, molecular alterations, and biomarkers that can predict response or resistance to these treatments. Furthermore, we prioritize laboratory and animal studies that explore new drugs and targeted agents with the potential to advance to clinical trials. We also encourage research on targetable mechanisms of cancer development, progression, and metastasis.
期刊最新文献
Vvax001, a Therapeutic Vaccine for Patients with HPV16-positive High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: a Phase II Trial First-in-Human Phase 1 study of a CD16A bispecific innate cell engager, AFM24, targeting EGFR-expressing solid tumors. Intratumoral or Subcutaneous MK-2118, a Non-Cyclic Dinucleotide STING Agonist, With or Without Pembrolizumab for Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors or Lymphomas. Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Loss Following Treatment with Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Pretargeted Trop-2 immunoPET for rapid, selective detection of pancreatic tumors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1