Effects of turbulence boundary conditions on Spalart-Allmaras RANS simulations for active flow control applications

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q3 MECHANICS Meccanica Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1007/s11012-024-01904-0
Navid Monshi Tousi, Josep M. Bergadà, Fernando Mellibovsky
{"title":"Effects of turbulence boundary conditions on Spalart-Allmaras RANS simulations for active flow control applications","authors":"Navid Monshi Tousi,&nbsp;Josep M. Bergadà,&nbsp;Fernando Mellibovsky","doi":"10.1007/s11012-024-01904-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We assess the suitability of Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulation using the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) turbulence model as a closure in analysing the performance of fluidic Active Flow Control (AFC) applications. In particular, we focus on the optimal set of actuation parameters found by Tousi et al. (Appl Math Model, 2021) and Tousi et al. (Aerospace Sci Technol 127:107679, 2022) for a SD7003 airfoil at a Reynolds number <span>\\(Re=6\\times 10^4\\)</span> and post-stall angle of attack <span>\\(\\alpha =14^\\circ\\)</span> fitted with a Synthetic Jet Actuator (SJA). The Large Eddy Simulation (LES) presented in that work is taken as the reference to identify the best choice of boundary conditions for the turbulence field <span>\\(\\tilde{\\nu }\\)</span> at both domain inlet and jet orifice in two-dimensional SA-RANS computations. Although SA-RANS is far less accurate than LES, our findings show that it can still predict macroscopic aggregates such as lift and drag coefficients quite satisfactorily and at a much lower computational cost, provided that turbulence levels of the actuator jet are set to a realistic value. An adequate value of <span>\\(\\tilde{\\nu }\\)</span> is instrumental in capturing the correct flow behaviour of the reattached boundary layers for close-to-optimal actuated cases. This validates the use of RANS-SA as a reliable and cost-effective simulation method for the preliminary optimisation of SJA parameters in AFC applications, provided that thorough sensitivity analysis on turbulence-related boundary conditions is performed. Given the strong sensitivity of flow detachment on the laminar or turbulent nature of boundary layers, our results suggest that such analyses are particularly indispensable for vastly separated flow scenarios in general, notably for bluff bodies at moderate transcritical Reynolds numbers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":695,"journal":{"name":"Meccanica","volume":"59 12","pages":"2283 - 2294"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11012-024-01904-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meccanica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11012-024-01904-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We assess the suitability of Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulation using the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) turbulence model as a closure in analysing the performance of fluidic Active Flow Control (AFC) applications. In particular, we focus on the optimal set of actuation parameters found by Tousi et al. (Appl Math Model, 2021) and Tousi et al. (Aerospace Sci Technol 127:107679, 2022) for a SD7003 airfoil at a Reynolds number \(Re=6\times 10^4\) and post-stall angle of attack \(\alpha =14^\circ\) fitted with a Synthetic Jet Actuator (SJA). The Large Eddy Simulation (LES) presented in that work is taken as the reference to identify the best choice of boundary conditions for the turbulence field \(\tilde{\nu }\) at both domain inlet and jet orifice in two-dimensional SA-RANS computations. Although SA-RANS is far less accurate than LES, our findings show that it can still predict macroscopic aggregates such as lift and drag coefficients quite satisfactorily and at a much lower computational cost, provided that turbulence levels of the actuator jet are set to a realistic value. An adequate value of \(\tilde{\nu }\) is instrumental in capturing the correct flow behaviour of the reattached boundary layers for close-to-optimal actuated cases. This validates the use of RANS-SA as a reliable and cost-effective simulation method for the preliminary optimisation of SJA parameters in AFC applications, provided that thorough sensitivity analysis on turbulence-related boundary conditions is performed. Given the strong sensitivity of flow detachment on the laminar or turbulent nature of boundary layers, our results suggest that such analyses are particularly indispensable for vastly separated flow scenarios in general, notably for bluff bodies at moderate transcritical Reynolds numbers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
湍流边界条件对主动流动控制应用的Spalart-Allmaras RANS模拟的影响
我们使用Spalart-Allmaras (SA)湍流模型来评估reynolds - average Navier-Stokes (RANS)模拟在分析流体主动流动控制(AFC)应用性能中的适用性。我们特别关注了Tousi等人(应用数学模型,2021)和Tousi等人(航空航天科学技术127:107679,2022)发现的SD7003翼型在雷诺数\(Re=6\times 10^4\)和失速后攻角\(\alpha =14^\circ\)下安装合成射流致动器(SJA)的最佳驱动参数集。本文以大涡模拟(LES)为参考,确定了二维SA-RANS计算中湍流场\(\tilde{\nu }\)边界条件的最佳选择。尽管SA-RANS远不如LES精确,但我们的研究结果表明,只要将执行器射流的湍流水平设置为现实值,它仍然可以非常令人满意地预测升力和阻力系数等宏观聚集,并且计算成本要低得多。对于接近最佳的驱动情况,\(\tilde{\nu }\)的适当值有助于捕获重新附着的边界层的正确流动行为。这验证了ranss - sa作为AFC应用中SJA参数初步优化的可靠且经济的模拟方法,前提是对湍流相关的边界条件进行彻底的灵敏度分析。考虑到流动分离对边界层层流或湍流性质的强烈敏感性,我们的研究结果表明,这种分析对于一般情况下的大分离流动情况尤其必要,特别是对于中等跨临界雷诺数的钝体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Meccanica
Meccanica 物理-力学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
151
审稿时长
7 months
期刊介绍: Meccanica focuses on the methodological framework shared by mechanical scientists when addressing theoretical or applied problems. Original papers address various aspects of mechanical and mathematical modeling, of solution, as well as of analysis of system behavior. The journal explores fundamental and applications issues in established areas of mechanics research as well as in emerging fields; contemporary research on general mechanics, solid and structural mechanics, fluid mechanics, and mechanics of machines; interdisciplinary fields between mechanics and other mathematical and engineering sciences; interaction of mechanics with dynamical systems, advanced materials, control and computation; electromechanics; biomechanics. Articles include full length papers; topical overviews; brief notes; discussions and comments on published papers; book reviews; and an international calendar of conferences. Meccanica, the official journal of the Italian Association of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, was established in 1966.
期刊最新文献
Dynamic mechanical behavior of ice with different cotton contents Preface to the Special Issue of Meccanica “Sixty years of thermodynamics of continuous media (1963–2023)” Design and simulation of a desk-size parallel kinematic machine for simulation of seismic events Nonlinear control and parametric uncertainties of flexible-joint robots Effects of turbulence boundary conditions on Spalart-Allmaras RANS simulations for active flow control applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1