Rishi P Singh, David Tabano, Blanche L Kuo, Andrew LaPrise, Theodore Leng, Eunice Kim, Meghan Hatfield, Vincent Garmo
{"title":"How intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor initial dosing impacts patient outcomes in diabetic macular oedema.","authors":"Rishi P Singh, David Tabano, Blanche L Kuo, Andrew LaPrise, Theodore Leng, Eunice Kim, Meghan Hatfield, Vincent Garmo","doi":"10.1186/s12886-024-03797-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment for diabetic macular oedema (DME) may begin with several initial monthly doses. Characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes were compared for eyes with DME that did and did not receive such initial doses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective database study using American Academy of Ophthalmology Intelligent Research in Sight<sup>®</sup> Registry data (01/01/15-31/12/20; index period). Eligible adults had documented DME within 2 months of first anti-VEGF treatment (index date), data available for 12 months beforehand, and ≥ 1 visual acuity (VA) recording ≤ 60 days before index date. Eyes must have received intravitreal anti-VEGF injections during the index period, but none in the prior 12 months. Characteristics and outcomes for eyes with initial doses (three injections within 100 days of index date) were compared with those without. Multivariate Cox Proportional Hazards modelling estimated predictors for treatment discontinuation, re-initiation, or switch; Generalized Estimating Equations-adjusted modelling estimated characteristics associated with receiving initial doses. Demographics and characteristics were summarised. Injection frequency and number, and VA were determined annually for ≤ 6 years. Discontinuations, reinitiations and switches were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Included were 217,696 eyes (n = 77,769 initial; n = 139,927 non-initial) from 166,868 patients. Mean (SD) baseline VA was numerically higher for eyes with versus without initial doses (63.0 [18.1] vs. 62.5 [19.8] letters); this remained during follow-up. Based on modelling results, Eyes with initial doses received more injections (mean [standard deviation (SD)] 11.6 [8.9] vs. 6.1 [6.8] injections) more frequently (interval 7.6 [2.8] vs. 12.6 [7.7] weeks) than eyes without. These differences occurred across follow-up years. Discontinuation (45.7% vs. 63.8%), re-initiation (17.2% vs. 25.0%), and switch (24.5% vs. 31.5%) were less common with initial doses. Asian, Black, and patients of other/unknown race were less likely (P < 0.01) to receive initial doses than White patients, as were Medicare/Medicaid-insured patients versus commercially insured patients (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Various sociodemographic factors associate with initial anti-VEGF doses, including race, ethnicity and insurance. Although eyes with frequent initial doses maintained higher VA than those without, they also receive more injections over time. Further research may elucidate the impact of frequent initial doses versus total injection number on DME outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":"24 1","pages":"552"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11684133/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03797-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment for diabetic macular oedema (DME) may begin with several initial monthly doses. Characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes were compared for eyes with DME that did and did not receive such initial doses.
Methods: This was a retrospective database study using American Academy of Ophthalmology Intelligent Research in Sight® Registry data (01/01/15-31/12/20; index period). Eligible adults had documented DME within 2 months of first anti-VEGF treatment (index date), data available for 12 months beforehand, and ≥ 1 visual acuity (VA) recording ≤ 60 days before index date. Eyes must have received intravitreal anti-VEGF injections during the index period, but none in the prior 12 months. Characteristics and outcomes for eyes with initial doses (three injections within 100 days of index date) were compared with those without. Multivariate Cox Proportional Hazards modelling estimated predictors for treatment discontinuation, re-initiation, or switch; Generalized Estimating Equations-adjusted modelling estimated characteristics associated with receiving initial doses. Demographics and characteristics were summarised. Injection frequency and number, and VA were determined annually for ≤ 6 years. Discontinuations, reinitiations and switches were compared.
Results: Included were 217,696 eyes (n = 77,769 initial; n = 139,927 non-initial) from 166,868 patients. Mean (SD) baseline VA was numerically higher for eyes with versus without initial doses (63.0 [18.1] vs. 62.5 [19.8] letters); this remained during follow-up. Based on modelling results, Eyes with initial doses received more injections (mean [standard deviation (SD)] 11.6 [8.9] vs. 6.1 [6.8] injections) more frequently (interval 7.6 [2.8] vs. 12.6 [7.7] weeks) than eyes without. These differences occurred across follow-up years. Discontinuation (45.7% vs. 63.8%), re-initiation (17.2% vs. 25.0%), and switch (24.5% vs. 31.5%) were less common with initial doses. Asian, Black, and patients of other/unknown race were less likely (P < 0.01) to receive initial doses than White patients, as were Medicare/Medicaid-insured patients versus commercially insured patients (P < 0.01).
Conclusions: Various sociodemographic factors associate with initial anti-VEGF doses, including race, ethnicity and insurance. Although eyes with frequent initial doses maintained higher VA than those without, they also receive more injections over time. Further research may elucidate the impact of frequent initial doses versus total injection number on DME outcomes.
背景:玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)可以从几个月的初始剂量开始。比较了接受和未接受初始剂量DME的眼睛的特征、治疗模式和结果。方法:采用美国眼科智能研究协会(American Academy of Ophthalmology Intelligent Research in Sight®Registry)注册数据(01/01/15-31/12/20;指数期)。符合条件的成人在首次抗vegf治疗2个月内(索引日期)记录有DME,在此之前12个月可获得数据,并且在索引日期前≤60天视力(VA)记录≥1。眼睛必须在指数期间接受过玻璃体内抗vegf注射,但在之前的12个月内没有接受过。将初始剂量(100天内注射三次)的眼睛与未注射的眼睛的特征和结果进行比较。多变量Cox比例风险模型估计了治疗停止、重新开始或切换的预测因子;广义估计方程-调整模型估计与接受初始剂量有关的特征。总结了人口统计和特征。注射次数、注射次数、VA每年测定一次,≤6年。对中断、重新启动和切换进行比较。结果:纳入217,696只眼(n = 77,769初始;N = 139,927(非初始),来自166,868例患者。初始剂量组的平均(SD)基线VA数值高于未初始剂量组(63.0[18.1]比62.5[19.8]字母);这在随访期间保持不变。根据建模结果,初始剂量的眼睛比没有初始剂量的眼睛更频繁地接受注射(平均[标准差(SD)] 11.6[8.9]对6.1[6.8]注射)(间隔7.6[2.8]对12.6[7.7]周)。这些差异发生在后续的几年中。停用(45.7% vs. 63.8%)、重新起始(17.2% vs. 25.0%)和切换(24.5% vs. 31.5%)在初始剂量中较少见。亚洲人、黑人和其他/未知种族的患者更不可能(P结论:各种社会人口因素与初始抗vegf剂量相关,包括种族、民族和保险。虽然最初频繁注射的眼睛比没有注射的眼睛保持更高的VA,但随着时间的推移,他们也会接受更多的注射。进一步的研究可能会阐明频繁的初始剂量与总注射次数对二甲醚结果的影响。
期刊介绍:
BMC Ophthalmology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of eye disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.