A meta-analysis and systematic review of myocardial infarction-induced cardiomyocyte proliferation in adult mouse heart.

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMC Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1186/s12916-024-03822-0
Ya Liu, Lingyan Liu, Pengcheng Zhuang, Jiamin Zou, Xiaokang Chen, Hao Wu, Bingjun Lu, Wei Eric Wang
{"title":"A meta-analysis and systematic review of myocardial infarction-induced cardiomyocyte proliferation in adult mouse heart.","authors":"Ya Liu, Lingyan Liu, Pengcheng Zhuang, Jiamin Zou, Xiaokang Chen, Hao Wu, Bingjun Lu, Wei Eric Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12916-024-03822-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The proliferation capacity of adult cardiomyocytes is very limited in the normal adult mammalian heart. Previous studies implied that cardiomyocyte proliferation increases after injury stimulation, but the result is controversial partly due to different methodologies. We aim to evaluate whether myocardial infarction (MI) stimulates cardiomyocyte proliferation in adult mice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted through PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases from 1 January 2000 to 21 December 2023. The SYRCLE's Risk of Bias tool for animal experiments was used to evaluate the quality of the literature by two independent reviewers. Twenty-six studies with cell cycle indicators (Ki67<sup>+</sup>, PH3<sup>+</sup>, BrdU/EdU<sup>+</sup>, and AurkB<sup>+</sup>) to evaluate cycling cardiomyocytes were collected for a meta-analysis. Another 10 studies with genetic reporter/tracing systems to evaluate cardiomyocyte proliferation were collected for a systematic review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Evaluating cardiomyocyte proliferation by immunostaining of the cell cycle indicators on heart tissue, the meta-analysis showed that differences of Ki67<sup>+</sup>, PH3<sup>+</sup>, and BrdU/EdU<sup>+</sup> cycling cardiomyocytes between MI and Sham groups were not statistically significant. In the post-MI heart, the percentages of PH3<sup>+</sup>, BrdU/EdU<sup>+</sup>, and AurkB<sup>+</sup> cardiomyocytes were not significantly different between the infarct border zone and remote zone. The percentage of Ki67<sup>+</sup> cardiomyocytes in the infarct border zone was statistically higher than that in the remote zone. Most of the studies (6 out of 10) using genetic reporter/tracing mouse systems showed that the difference in cardiomyocyte proliferation between MI and Sham groups was not statistically significant. Among the other 4 studies, at least 3 studies could not demonstrate that MI stimulates bona fide cardiomyocyte proliferation because of methodological shortages.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MI injury increases Ki67<sup>+</sup> cycling adult mouse cardiomyocytes in infarct border zone. Very little overwhelming evidence shows that MI stimulates bona fide proliferation in the adult heart.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"22 1","pages":"603"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11686908/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03822-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The proliferation capacity of adult cardiomyocytes is very limited in the normal adult mammalian heart. Previous studies implied that cardiomyocyte proliferation increases after injury stimulation, but the result is controversial partly due to different methodologies. We aim to evaluate whether myocardial infarction (MI) stimulates cardiomyocyte proliferation in adult mice.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted through PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases from 1 January 2000 to 21 December 2023. The SYRCLE's Risk of Bias tool for animal experiments was used to evaluate the quality of the literature by two independent reviewers. Twenty-six studies with cell cycle indicators (Ki67+, PH3+, BrdU/EdU+, and AurkB+) to evaluate cycling cardiomyocytes were collected for a meta-analysis. Another 10 studies with genetic reporter/tracing systems to evaluate cardiomyocyte proliferation were collected for a systematic review.

Results: Evaluating cardiomyocyte proliferation by immunostaining of the cell cycle indicators on heart tissue, the meta-analysis showed that differences of Ki67+, PH3+, and BrdU/EdU+ cycling cardiomyocytes between MI and Sham groups were not statistically significant. In the post-MI heart, the percentages of PH3+, BrdU/EdU+, and AurkB+ cardiomyocytes were not significantly different between the infarct border zone and remote zone. The percentage of Ki67+ cardiomyocytes in the infarct border zone was statistically higher than that in the remote zone. Most of the studies (6 out of 10) using genetic reporter/tracing mouse systems showed that the difference in cardiomyocyte proliferation between MI and Sham groups was not statistically significant. Among the other 4 studies, at least 3 studies could not demonstrate that MI stimulates bona fide cardiomyocyte proliferation because of methodological shortages.

Conclusions: MI injury increases Ki67+ cycling adult mouse cardiomyocytes in infarct border zone. Very little overwhelming evidence shows that MI stimulates bona fide proliferation in the adult heart.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成年小鼠心肌梗死诱导心肌细胞增殖的荟萃分析和系统综述。
背景:在正常成年哺乳动物心脏中,成年心肌细胞的增殖能力非常有限。以往的研究表明,损伤刺激后心肌细胞增殖增加,但由于方法不同,结果存在争议。我们的目的是评估心肌梗死(MI)是否刺激成年小鼠心肌细胞增殖。方法:从2000年1月1日至2023年12月21日,通过PubMed/Medline、Embase和Web of Science数据库进行综合文献检索。两位独立的审稿人使用sycle的动物实验偏倚风险工具来评估文献的质量。收集26项使用细胞周期指标(Ki67+、PH3+、BrdU/EdU+和AurkB+)评估心肌细胞周期的研究进行meta分析。另外10项使用遗传报告/追踪系统评估心肌细胞增殖的研究被收集起来进行系统回顾。结果:通过心脏组织细胞周期指标免疫染色评价心肌细胞增殖,meta分析显示,心肌梗死组和假手术组之间Ki67+、PH3+、BrdU/EdU+周期心肌细胞的差异无统计学意义。心肌梗死后,心肌细胞PH3+、BrdU/EdU+和AurkB+的百分比在梗死边缘区和远端区无显著差异。梗死边缘区Ki67+心肌细胞的百分比明显高于梗死边缘区。大多数使用遗传报告/追踪小鼠系统的研究(10项中的6项)显示,心肌梗死组和假手术组之间心肌细胞增殖的差异无统计学意义。在其他4项研究中,由于方法上的不足,至少有3项研究不能证明心肌梗死刺激真正的心肌细胞增殖。结论:心肌梗死使心肌梗死边缘区Ki67+循环的成年小鼠心肌细胞增加。很少有压倒性的证据表明心肌梗死会刺激成人心脏的真正增殖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
期刊最新文献
Bridging animal models and humans: neuroimaging as intermediate phenotypes linking genetic or stress factors to anhedonia. Development a glycosylated extracellular vesicle-derived miRNA Signature for early detection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Performance of the 2023 diagnostic criteria for MOGAD: real-world application in a Chinese multicenter cohort of pediatric and adult patients. Translation of PET radiotracers for cancer imaging: recommendations from the National Cancer Imaging Translational Accelerator (NCITA) consensus meeting. Genetic variation reveals the therapeutic potential of BRSK2 in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1