{"title":"Evaluating the effect of VersaWrap tendon protector on functional outcomes in operative tendon repairs.","authors":"Yaw Adu, Justin Harder, Cameron Cox, Gracie Baum, Evan J Hernandez, Brendan J MacKay","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1447515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tendon repairs often result in adhesion formation which can cause persisting functional deficits. Close proximity of healing tissues increases friction during tendon excursion, often leading to tendon tethering postoperatively. Despite continued improvements in techniques for tendon repairs, there is currently no consensus on the most effective modality to reduce adhesion formation. The VersaWrap Tendon Protector is a bioresorbable hydrogel that is FDA-cleared for use in tendon repair by separating healing tendons from surrounding tissues and improving tendon gliding. We conducted a study to assess the efficacy of VersaWrap in improving clinical outcomes related to adhesions and tethering in tendon repairs involving the hand.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>Age, sex, injury type, mechanism of injury, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, active and passive range of motion (ROM), percent return to normal function, and patient-reported outcomes forms (QuickDASH) were collected at baseline and routine follow up visits. Functional outcomes were classified according to Strickland and Glogovac grading system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>90 patients were included, with an average age of 39.8 years and a 44% female gender. The most common mechanism of injury was sharp laceration, and the majority of repairs involved the extensor mechanism (58.8% extensor, 35.3% flexor, 5.8% both). At a mean follow-up of 4.6 months, the mean active and passive ROM was 88.8% and 94.3%, respectively. Mean percent return of function was 87.7%. Good or Excellent functional outcomes were achieved in 92.3% of patients - 70.5% Excellent, 21.8% Good, 6.4% Fair, 1.3% Poor. The average QuickDASH score was 30.7, and the average final VAS pain score was 1.3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tendon repairs and tenolysis procedures often result in reduced functionality due to impeded tendon gliding, and there is currently no consensus on optimal treatment to prevent tethering to surrounding tissues. The VersaWrap Tendon Protector creates a gelatinous layer between the tendon and surrounding soft tissue to improve gliding resistance, thereby limiting tendon sheath adhesions. Our data suggests that VersaWrap may be a useful adjunct in preventing tendon tethering adhesion post-repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"11 ","pages":"1447515"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683011/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1447515","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Tendon repairs often result in adhesion formation which can cause persisting functional deficits. Close proximity of healing tissues increases friction during tendon excursion, often leading to tendon tethering postoperatively. Despite continued improvements in techniques for tendon repairs, there is currently no consensus on the most effective modality to reduce adhesion formation. The VersaWrap Tendon Protector is a bioresorbable hydrogel that is FDA-cleared for use in tendon repair by separating healing tendons from surrounding tissues and improving tendon gliding. We conducted a study to assess the efficacy of VersaWrap in improving clinical outcomes related to adhesions and tethering in tendon repairs involving the hand.
Materials & methods: Age, sex, injury type, mechanism of injury, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, active and passive range of motion (ROM), percent return to normal function, and patient-reported outcomes forms (QuickDASH) were collected at baseline and routine follow up visits. Functional outcomes were classified according to Strickland and Glogovac grading system.
Results: 90 patients were included, with an average age of 39.8 years and a 44% female gender. The most common mechanism of injury was sharp laceration, and the majority of repairs involved the extensor mechanism (58.8% extensor, 35.3% flexor, 5.8% both). At a mean follow-up of 4.6 months, the mean active and passive ROM was 88.8% and 94.3%, respectively. Mean percent return of function was 87.7%. Good or Excellent functional outcomes were achieved in 92.3% of patients - 70.5% Excellent, 21.8% Good, 6.4% Fair, 1.3% Poor. The average QuickDASH score was 30.7, and the average final VAS pain score was 1.3.
Conclusions: Tendon repairs and tenolysis procedures often result in reduced functionality due to impeded tendon gliding, and there is currently no consensus on optimal treatment to prevent tethering to surrounding tissues. The VersaWrap Tendon Protector creates a gelatinous layer between the tendon and surrounding soft tissue to improve gliding resistance, thereby limiting tendon sheath adhesions. Our data suggests that VersaWrap may be a useful adjunct in preventing tendon tethering adhesion post-repair.
期刊介绍:
Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles.
Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery.
Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact.
The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.