{"title":"A systematic review of predictors and moderators of treatment response in psychological interventions for persisting forms of depression.","authors":"Margaret Lyons, Jaime Delgadillo","doi":"10.1111/bjc.12513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although psychological interventions can be effective for the treatment of major depressive disorder, some patients' symptoms persist or rapidly recur after therapy. This study aimed to synthesize research findings on predictors and moderators of treatment response for persisting forms of depression, such as chronic, recurrent, and treatment-resistant depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of studies investigating predictors and moderators of response to outpatient psychological treatment for adults with persisting forms of depression was conducted by searching Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycInfo. A total of 23 eligible studies were included, assessed for risk of bias, and summarized using a narrative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-five predictor and moderator variables were examined across studies, categorized into sociodemographic, clinical, interpersonal/personality, psychological, and treatment variables. Most variables were only examined in single studies, which were rarely adequately powered for predictor and moderator analyses. Among variables studied more frequently (age, gender, baseline depression severity, childhood trauma), only baseline depression severity was found to be a replicated and consistent predictor of poorer treatment response. Risk of bias was low to medium for the majority of studies.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Meta-analysis could not be done due to methodological heterogeneity among studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our current understanding of significant predictors and moderators for persisting forms of depression is limited. A high level of baseline severity of depressive symptoms is so far the only variable consistently associated with poorer treatment response in this clinical population.</p>","PeriodicalId":48211,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12513","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Although psychological interventions can be effective for the treatment of major depressive disorder, some patients' symptoms persist or rapidly recur after therapy. This study aimed to synthesize research findings on predictors and moderators of treatment response for persisting forms of depression, such as chronic, recurrent, and treatment-resistant depression.
Methods: A systematic review of studies investigating predictors and moderators of response to outpatient psychological treatment for adults with persisting forms of depression was conducted by searching Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycInfo. A total of 23 eligible studies were included, assessed for risk of bias, and summarized using a narrative synthesis.
Results: Sixty-five predictor and moderator variables were examined across studies, categorized into sociodemographic, clinical, interpersonal/personality, psychological, and treatment variables. Most variables were only examined in single studies, which were rarely adequately powered for predictor and moderator analyses. Among variables studied more frequently (age, gender, baseline depression severity, childhood trauma), only baseline depression severity was found to be a replicated and consistent predictor of poorer treatment response. Risk of bias was low to medium for the majority of studies.
Limitations: Meta-analysis could not be done due to methodological heterogeneity among studies.
Conclusion: Our current understanding of significant predictors and moderators for persisting forms of depression is limited. A high level of baseline severity of depressive symptoms is so far the only variable consistently associated with poorer treatment response in this clinical population.
背景:虽然心理干预对重度抑郁症的治疗是有效的,但一些患者的症状在治疗后持续存在或迅速复发。本研究旨在综合有关慢性、复发性和难治性抑郁症治疗反应的预测因子和调节因子的研究结果。方法:通过检索Web of Science、Scopus和PsycInfo,系统回顾了调查持续形式抑郁症成人门诊心理治疗反应的预测因素和调节因素的研究。共纳入23项符合条件的研究,评估偏倚风险,并采用叙事综合法进行总结。结果:65个预测变量和调节变量在研究中被检查,分类为社会人口学、临床、人际/人格、心理和治疗变量。大多数变量仅在单个研究中进行了检查,很少有足够的预测和调节分析能力。在更频繁研究的变量(年龄、性别、基线抑郁严重程度、童年创伤)中,只有基线抑郁严重程度被发现是较差治疗反应的重复和一致的预测因子。大多数研究的偏倚风险为低至中等。局限性:由于研究方法的异质性,不能进行meta分析。结论:我们目前对持续形式抑郁的重要预测因子和调节因子的理解是有限的。到目前为止,高水平的基线抑郁症状严重程度是与该临床人群较差的治疗反应一致相关的唯一变量。
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Clinical Psychology publishes original research, both empirical and theoretical, on all aspects of clinical psychology: - clinical and abnormal psychology featuring descriptive or experimental studies - aetiology, assessment and treatment of the whole range of psychological disorders irrespective of age group and setting - biological influences on individual behaviour - studies of psychological interventions and treatment on individuals, dyads, families and groups