Need for and Acceptance of Digital Health Interventions for Self-Management among Older Adults Living Alone: A Mixed-Methods Approach.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 NURSING Asian Nursing Research Pub Date : 2024-12-28 DOI:10.1016/j.anr.2024.12.007
Gahye Kim, Minhwa Hwang, Seonghyeon Lee, Yeon-Hwan Park
{"title":"Need for and Acceptance of Digital Health Interventions for Self-Management among Older Adults Living Alone: A Mixed-Methods Approach.","authors":"Gahye Kim, Minhwa Hwang, Seonghyeon Lee, Yeon-Hwan Park","doi":"10.1016/j.anr.2024.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although digital solutions could mitigate the challenges faced by older adults living alone (OALA), only a few studies investigated the need for and acceptance of digital health interventions for self-management (DHISMs) among this demographic. Thus, we aim to explore this need and acceptance, along with the contextual factors, among OALA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods research approach was adopted. We conducted 1) a quantitative survey (n=191) to investigate the need for and acceptance of DHISMs using a numeric rating scale and 2) a qualitative study (n=24) based on focus group interviews to explore contextual factors related to the quantitative results. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the quantitative study, the mean scores for the need for and acceptance of DHISMs were 6.41 and 6.53 out of 10, respectively. Emergency response systems had the highest need and acceptance scores, whereas digital interventions for behavioral change (medication adherence, sleep, stress, and diet management) had relatively lower scores. The qualitative analysis revealed two themes and five subthemes: the need for inclusive support for independent living (environmental safety and diverse self-management challenges with limited support) and multidimensional factors related to DHISM acceptance (personal, technological, and relational barriers and facilitators).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the future, the unique and multidimensional factors influencing the need for and acceptance of DHISMs among OALA should be carefully considered to support their self-management and independent living. Blended care, which involves integrating age-friendly technology with personalized human interaction, is pivotal for increasing DHISM acceptance in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":55450,"journal":{"name":"Asian Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2024.12.007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Although digital solutions could mitigate the challenges faced by older adults living alone (OALA), only a few studies investigated the need for and acceptance of digital health interventions for self-management (DHISMs) among this demographic. Thus, we aim to explore this need and acceptance, along with the contextual factors, among OALA.

Methods: A mixed-methods research approach was adopted. We conducted 1) a quantitative survey (n=191) to investigate the need for and acceptance of DHISMs using a numeric rating scale and 2) a qualitative study (n=24) based on focus group interviews to explore contextual factors related to the quantitative results. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: In the quantitative study, the mean scores for the need for and acceptance of DHISMs were 6.41 and 6.53 out of 10, respectively. Emergency response systems had the highest need and acceptance scores, whereas digital interventions for behavioral change (medication adherence, sleep, stress, and diet management) had relatively lower scores. The qualitative analysis revealed two themes and five subthemes: the need for inclusive support for independent living (environmental safety and diverse self-management challenges with limited support) and multidimensional factors related to DHISM acceptance (personal, technological, and relational barriers and facilitators).

Conclusions: In the future, the unique and multidimensional factors influencing the need for and acceptance of DHISMs among OALA should be carefully considered to support their self-management and independent living. Blended care, which involves integrating age-friendly technology with personalized human interaction, is pivotal for increasing DHISM acceptance in this population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
独居老人对自我管理数字健康干预的需求和接受程度:一种混合方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
32
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Asian Nursing Research is the official peer-reviewed research journal of the Korean Society of Nursing Science, and is devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will contribute to the body of nursing science and inform the practice of nursing, nursing education, administration, and history, on health issues relevant to nursing, and on the testing of research findings in practice.
期刊最新文献
Factors Associated With Registered Nurses' Safety Nursing Activities in Nursing Homes. Factors associated with habitual drug use among adolescents: A secondary data analysis. Need for and Acceptance of Digital Health Interventions for Self-Management among Older Adults Living Alone: A Mixed-Methods Approach. Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure nurses' perceived knowledge, attitudes and practices related to motor function rehabilitation in stroke patients with hemiplegia. Job satisfaction among blood center nurses based on the job crafting model: A mixed methods study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1