US regulatory compliance for medical combination products: an overview.

IF 2.7 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Frontiers in medical technology Pub Date : 2024-12-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmedt.2024.1486318
Manav V Singh, Prafulla Apshingekar, Sanyam Gandhi, Om V Singh
{"title":"US regulatory compliance for medical combination products: an overview.","authors":"Manav V Singh, Prafulla Apshingekar, Sanyam Gandhi, Om V Singh","doi":"10.3389/fmedt.2024.1486318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article provides a high-level overview of US regulatory review and approval processes for the growing field of medical combination products (CPs; those merging drugs with devices and/or biological products). US law defines drugs, medical devices, and CPs in specific ways, and the components of a CP are still subject to their respective regulations while combined. The Food and Drug Administration's Office of Combination Products (OCP) oversees the review and classification of CPs, which is based on their primary mode of action. When a manufacturer submits a Request for Designation for a new CP, the OCP conducts a technical and clinical evaluation to identify risks and verify modes of action and therapeutic benefits. Evaluating the safety and efficacy of CPs and their constituent parts can be challenging due to the many potential interactions. However, as innovation continues in the health care landscape and the variety of CPs on the market increases, manufacturers must stay proactive in complying with regulatory standards and keeping their products safe.</p>","PeriodicalId":94015,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in medical technology","volume":"6 ","pages":"1486318"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11684512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in medical technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2024.1486318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article provides a high-level overview of US regulatory review and approval processes for the growing field of medical combination products (CPs; those merging drugs with devices and/or biological products). US law defines drugs, medical devices, and CPs in specific ways, and the components of a CP are still subject to their respective regulations while combined. The Food and Drug Administration's Office of Combination Products (OCP) oversees the review and classification of CPs, which is based on their primary mode of action. When a manufacturer submits a Request for Designation for a new CP, the OCP conducts a technical and clinical evaluation to identify risks and verify modes of action and therapeutic benefits. Evaluating the safety and efficacy of CPs and their constituent parts can be challenging due to the many potential interactions. However, as innovation continues in the health care landscape and the variety of CPs on the market increases, manufacturers must stay proactive in complying with regulatory standards and keeping their products safe.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗组合产品的美国法规遵从性:概述。
本文提供了美国监管审查和批准流程的高级概述,用于不断增长的医疗组合产品(CPs;那些将药物与器械和/或生物制品合并的药物)。美国法律以特定的方式定义药品、医疗器械和CP,并且CP的组成部分在组合时仍受各自法规的约束。美国食品和药物管理局的组合产品办公室(OCP)监督CPs的审查和分类,这是基于它们的主要作用方式。当制造商提交新CP指定请求时,OCP进行技术和临床评估,以识别风险并验证作用模式和治疗益处。由于许多潜在的相互作用,评估CPs及其组成部分的安全性和有效性可能具有挑战性。然而,随着医疗保健领域的不断创新和市场上cp种类的增加,制造商必须积极主动地遵守监管标准并确保其产品安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ultrasound-based radiomics and clinical factors-based nomogram for early intracranial hypertension detection in patients with decompressive craniotomy. Survey of Notified Bodies reveals very limited use of conditional certification for high-risk medical devices. Analysis of small extracellular vesicles from dried blood spots. Bibliometrics of the current state of application of teletechnology in the rehabilitation of patients with heart and large blood vessel disease. Beyond sensitivity: what are the enabling opportunities of OPM-MEG?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1