Efficacy and Safety of Chemotherapy or EGFR-TKIs as First-Line Therapy in NSCLC Patients Harboring Non-Ex 20 Ins Uncommon EGFR Mutations: A Retrospective Study in China.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Cancer Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1002/cam4.70542
Chen Liao, Li Bai, Tingting He, Qingle Liang, Defeng Hu, Shipeng Lei, Yong He, Yubo Wang
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Chemotherapy or EGFR-TKIs as First-Line Therapy in NSCLC Patients Harboring Non-Ex 20 Ins Uncommon EGFR Mutations: A Retrospective Study in China.","authors":"Chen Liao, Li Bai, Tingting He, Qingle Liang, Defeng Hu, Shipeng Lei, Yong He, Yubo Wang","doi":"10.1002/cam4.70542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uncommon EGFR mutations are a kind of heterogeneous group of mutations with various responses to EGFR-TKIs and are often excluded from most prospective clinical trials. In this real-world retrospective study, we retrospectively compared the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy or various generations of EGFR-TKIs as first-line therapy in NSCLC Chinese patients harboring non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 139 NSCLC patients with non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations in this study retrospectively. Patients' clinical characteristics and the efficacy and safety of different first-line therapies were analyzed and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our data reviewed that for first-line therapy, NSCLC patients harboring non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations benefited more from EGFR-TKIs compared with chemotherapy. Afatinib performed with great efficacy for the majority of non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations (N = 43, ORR = 41.86%, mPFS = 13.5 months, mOS = 20.8 months), especially in L861Q mutation (mPFS = 18.4 months). Osimertinib also demonstrated efficacy in patients harboring non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations (N = 36, ORR = 27.78%, mPFS = 10.0 months, mOS = 21.0 months), especially in those without L861Q and G719X mutations (mPFS = 12.1 months). When treated with afatinib, patients harboring non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations should pay attention to the management of safety, especially for gastrointestinal-related AE and rash, while osimertinib was safer.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Taking into account both efficacy and safety, afatinib and osimertinib are better choices than chemotherapy and first-generation EGFR-TKIs for NSCLC patients with non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations. L861Q showed a trend toward a better response to afatinib, while in those without L861Q and G719X mutations, osimertinib might be a better choice. Safety also should be a concern when choosing EGFR-TKI for treatment, patients should pay attention to the management of safety when using afatinib while osimertinib is safer.</p>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":"e70542"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683549/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70542","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Uncommon EGFR mutations are a kind of heterogeneous group of mutations with various responses to EGFR-TKIs and are often excluded from most prospective clinical trials. In this real-world retrospective study, we retrospectively compared the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy or various generations of EGFR-TKIs as first-line therapy in NSCLC Chinese patients harboring non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations.

Methods: We enrolled 139 NSCLC patients with non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations in this study retrospectively. Patients' clinical characteristics and the efficacy and safety of different first-line therapies were analyzed and compared.

Results: Our data reviewed that for first-line therapy, NSCLC patients harboring non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations benefited more from EGFR-TKIs compared with chemotherapy. Afatinib performed with great efficacy for the majority of non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations (N = 43, ORR = 41.86%, mPFS = 13.5 months, mOS = 20.8 months), especially in L861Q mutation (mPFS = 18.4 months). Osimertinib also demonstrated efficacy in patients harboring non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations (N = 36, ORR = 27.78%, mPFS = 10.0 months, mOS = 21.0 months), especially in those without L861Q and G719X mutations (mPFS = 12.1 months). When treated with afatinib, patients harboring non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations should pay attention to the management of safety, especially for gastrointestinal-related AE and rash, while osimertinib was safer.

Conclusion: Taking into account both efficacy and safety, afatinib and osimertinib are better choices than chemotherapy and first-generation EGFR-TKIs for NSCLC patients with non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations. L861Q showed a trend toward a better response to afatinib, while in those without L861Q and G719X mutations, osimertinib might be a better choice. Safety also should be a concern when choosing EGFR-TKI for treatment, patients should pay attention to the management of safety when using afatinib while osimertinib is safer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
化疗或EGFR- tkis作为一线治疗非ex - 20in罕见EGFR突变NSCLC患者的疗效和安全性:中国的一项回顾性研究
背景:罕见的EGFR突变是一种异质突变组,对EGFR- tkis有不同的反应,通常被排除在大多数前瞻性临床试验之外。在这项真实世界的回顾性研究中,我们回顾性地比较了化疗或不同代EGFR- tkis作为一线治疗具有非ex - 20in罕见EGFR突变的中国非小细胞肺癌患者的疗效和安全性。方法:我们回顾性研究了139例非ex - 20in罕见EGFR突变的非小细胞肺癌患者。分析比较患者的临床特点及不同一线治疗方法的疗效和安全性。结果:我们的数据回顾了一线治疗,与化疗相比,EGFR- tkis对非ex - 20in罕见EGFR突变的NSCLC患者获益更多。阿法替尼对大多数非ex - 20ins罕见EGFR突变(N = 43, ORR = 41.86%, mPFS = 13.5个月,mOS = 20.8个月)疗效显著,尤其是L861Q突变(mPFS = 18.4个月)。奥西替尼对非ex 20 in罕见EGFR突变(N = 36, ORR = 27.78%, mPFS = 10.0个月,mOS = 21.0个月)的患者也有疗效,特别是对没有L861Q和G719X突变的患者(mPFS = 12.1个月)。在使用阿法替尼治疗时,携带非ex - 20in罕见EGFR突变的患者应注意安全性管理,特别是胃肠道相关AE和皮疹,而奥西替尼更安全。结论:考虑到疗效和安全性,对于非ex - 20 in罕见EGFR突变的NSCLC患者,阿法替尼和奥西替尼是比化疗和第一代EGFR- tkis更好的选择。L861Q对阿法替尼有更好的应答趋势,而在没有L861Q和G719X突变的患者中,奥西替尼可能是更好的选择。在选择EGFR-TKI治疗时,安全性也应受到关注,患者在使用阿法替尼时应注意安全管理,而奥西替尼更安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Medicine
Cancer Medicine ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
907
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas: Clinical Cancer Research Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations Cancer Biology: Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery. Cancer Prevention: Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach. Bioinformatics: Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers. Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.
期刊最新文献
Application of Esophageal Sponge Cytology in Screening Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in a High-Risk Region of China. Real-World Impact of Olaparib Exposure in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Patients Harboring Germline BRCA1-2 Pathogenic Variants. Nanoparticle-Mediated Cuproptosis and Photodynamic Synergistic Strategy: A Novel Horizon for Cancer Therapy. RIOK1: A Novel Oncogenic Driver in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Characterization of Hospital Admissions During Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: Insights From the ICOG Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1