Diagnostic Accuracy and Reliability of CT-based Node-RADS for Esophageal Cancer.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL In vivo Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.21873/invivo.13835
Jakob Leonhardi, Benedikt Schnarkowski, Matthias Mehdorn, Anne-Kathrin Höhn, Stefan Niebisch, Patrick Plum, Daniel Seehofer, Solveig Tiepolt, Timm Denecke, Hans-Jonas Meyer
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy and Reliability of CT-based Node-RADS for Esophageal Cancer.","authors":"Jakob Leonhardi, Benedikt Schnarkowski, Matthias Mehdorn, Anne-Kathrin Höhn, Stefan Niebisch, Patrick Plum, Daniel Seehofer, Solveig Tiepolt, Timm Denecke, Hans-Jonas Meyer","doi":"10.21873/invivo.13835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>The recently published Node-Reporting and Data System (Node-RADS) can aid the characterization of lymph nodes in cross-sectional imaging. This study investigated the Node-RADS system in computed tomography (CT) to characterize lymph nodes in esophageal cancer.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Overall, 126 patients (15 female, 11.9%) with a mean age of 62.1±10.4 years comprised the patient sample. All patients underwent resection with curative intent and the lymph nodes were histopathologically analyzed during clinical routine. For every patient, the locoregional lymph nodes were scored in accordance with the Node-RADS classification. For statistical analysis, receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) with area under the curve (AUC) were used to test for diagnostic accuracy; inter-reader variability was assessed with Cohen's kappa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 54 patients were nodal positive (42.9%), 72 patients were nodal negative (57.1%). Inter-reader agreement was substantial for the overall Node-RADS scoring ([Formula: see text]=0.65, p<0.001). ROC curve analysis for lymph node discrimination (N0 versus N1-3) showed an AUC of 0.69 (95% confidence interval=0.59-0.79). A threshold score of more than 2 resulted in a sensitivity of 0.77 and a specificity of 0.55 for correctly predicting nodal positivity. Node-RADS 1 category had a malignancy rate of 30%, Node-RADS 2 of 14%, Node-RADS 3 of 81%, Node-RADS 4 of 90.1% and Node-RADS 5 of 86.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Node-RADS score on staging CT is associated with the malignancy rate of lymph nodes in patients with EC with only moderate diagnostic accuracy. The inter-reader variability is moderate, which could pose difficulties for translation into clinical routine.</p>","PeriodicalId":13364,"journal":{"name":"In vivo","volume":"39 1","pages":"353-359"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In vivo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13835","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: The recently published Node-Reporting and Data System (Node-RADS) can aid the characterization of lymph nodes in cross-sectional imaging. This study investigated the Node-RADS system in computed tomography (CT) to characterize lymph nodes in esophageal cancer.

Patients and methods: Overall, 126 patients (15 female, 11.9%) with a mean age of 62.1±10.4 years comprised the patient sample. All patients underwent resection with curative intent and the lymph nodes were histopathologically analyzed during clinical routine. For every patient, the locoregional lymph nodes were scored in accordance with the Node-RADS classification. For statistical analysis, receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) with area under the curve (AUC) were used to test for diagnostic accuracy; inter-reader variability was assessed with Cohen's kappa.

Results: Overall, 54 patients were nodal positive (42.9%), 72 patients were nodal negative (57.1%). Inter-reader agreement was substantial for the overall Node-RADS scoring ([Formula: see text]=0.65, p<0.001). ROC curve analysis for lymph node discrimination (N0 versus N1-3) showed an AUC of 0.69 (95% confidence interval=0.59-0.79). A threshold score of more than 2 resulted in a sensitivity of 0.77 and a specificity of 0.55 for correctly predicting nodal positivity. Node-RADS 1 category had a malignancy rate of 30%, Node-RADS 2 of 14%, Node-RADS 3 of 81%, Node-RADS 4 of 90.1% and Node-RADS 5 of 86.5%.

Conclusion: The Node-RADS score on staging CT is associated with the malignancy rate of lymph nodes in patients with EC with only moderate diagnostic accuracy. The inter-reader variability is moderate, which could pose difficulties for translation into clinical routine.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于ct的淋巴结rads诊断食管癌的准确性和可靠性。
背景/目的:最近发表的淋巴结报告和数据系统(Node-RADS)可以帮助在横断面成像中描述淋巴结。本研究探讨了计算机断层扫描(CT)中的淋巴结- rads系统对食管癌淋巴结的表征。患者和方法:患者样本共126例(女性15例,11.9%),平均年龄62.1±10.4岁。所有患者均行治疗目的切除,并在临床常规中对淋巴结进行组织病理学分析。根据Node-RADS分类对每位患者的局部区域淋巴结进行评分。统计分析采用受试者工作特征(ROC)和曲线下面积(AUC)来检验诊断的准确性;使用Cohen's kappa评估读者间变异性。结果:淋巴结阳性54例(42.9%),淋巴结阴性72例(57.1%)。结论:CT分期的Node-RADS评分与EC患者的淋巴结恶性率相关,诊断准确性仅为中等。解读者之间的可变性是中等的,这可能会给转化为临床常规带来困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
In vivo
In vivo 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IN VIVO is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to bring together original high quality works and reviews on experimental and clinical biomedical research within the frames of physiology, pathology and disease management. The topics of IN VIVO include: 1. Experimental development and application of new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures; 2. Pharmacological and toxicological evaluation of new drugs, drug combinations and drug delivery systems; 3. Clinical trials; 4. Development and characterization of models of biomedical research; 5. Cancer diagnosis and treatment; 6. Immunotherapy and vaccines; 7. Radiotherapy, Imaging; 8. Tissue engineering, Regenerative medicine; 9. Carcinogenesis.
期刊最新文献
Anamorelin in Cancer Cachexia: Gut Microbiota Effects and CONUT Score as a Predictor of Response. Loss of ZC3H12A Expression Is Linked to Higher Mortality Risk and Increased Lymphatic Metastasis in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Beyond Surgical Injury: Systemic Etiologies of Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Palsy. Best Practices for Instagram in Medical Education: A Study With Randomized Post Designs. Comparison of Survival Outcomes and Toxicities Between Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy and Conventional Radiotherapy in Early Glottic Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1