No single treatment modality exhibits clear superiority for infantile spasms syndrome: insights from a retrospective cohort study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Acta neurologica Belgica Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1007/s13760-024-02713-8
Loes Laurijssen, Katrien Jansen, Lieven Lagae
{"title":"No single treatment modality exhibits clear superiority for infantile spasms syndrome: insights from a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Loes Laurijssen, Katrien Jansen, Lieven Lagae","doi":"10.1007/s13760-024-02713-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infantile spasms syndrome is a severe form of infantile epilepsy. It is commonly treated with hormonal therapies or vigabatrin, either alone or in combination. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of these treatment modalities and explore associations with aetiology, and pre-existing developmental delay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with and treated for infantile spasms syndrome at the University Hospital of Leuven between 1 January 2018 and 23 November 2022, were identified. Retrospective clinical data were analysed descriptively. Short-term and long-term outcomes determined the efficacy of the current treatments, with seizure freedom and sustained normal development at 6 and 12 months after treatment initiation as primary treatment goals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 26 patients. No single treatment modality demonstrated clear superiority in terms of both short-term and long-term outcomes. Patients with unknown aetiology showed better developmental outcomes after 12 months than those with proven aetiology (30.77% with normal development versus 7.69%.) Another clear difference in treatment efficacy emerged between patients with and without pre-existing developmental issues, with only 6.67% achieving normal development after 12 months compared to 36.36%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No single treatment modality demonstrated clear superiority. Associations were found between treatment efficacy and aetiology as well as pre-existing developmental delay, suggesting these as potential prognostic indicators.</p>","PeriodicalId":7042,"journal":{"name":"Acta neurologica Belgica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta neurologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-024-02713-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infantile spasms syndrome is a severe form of infantile epilepsy. It is commonly treated with hormonal therapies or vigabatrin, either alone or in combination. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of these treatment modalities and explore associations with aetiology, and pre-existing developmental delay.

Methods: Patients diagnosed with and treated for infantile spasms syndrome at the University Hospital of Leuven between 1 January 2018 and 23 November 2022, were identified. Retrospective clinical data were analysed descriptively. Short-term and long-term outcomes determined the efficacy of the current treatments, with seizure freedom and sustained normal development at 6 and 12 months after treatment initiation as primary treatment goals.

Results: The study included 26 patients. No single treatment modality demonstrated clear superiority in terms of both short-term and long-term outcomes. Patients with unknown aetiology showed better developmental outcomes after 12 months than those with proven aetiology (30.77% with normal development versus 7.69%.) Another clear difference in treatment efficacy emerged between patients with and without pre-existing developmental issues, with only 6.67% achieving normal development after 12 months compared to 36.36%, respectively.

Conclusion: No single treatment modality demonstrated clear superiority. Associations were found between treatment efficacy and aetiology as well as pre-existing developmental delay, suggesting these as potential prognostic indicators.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
婴儿痉挛综合征没有一种治疗方法显示出明显的优越性:一项回顾性队列研究的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta neurologica Belgica
Acta neurologica Belgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Peer-reviewed and published quarterly, Acta Neurologica Belgicapresents original articles in the clinical and basic neurosciences, and also reports the proceedings and the abstracts of the scientific meetings of the different partner societies. The contents include commentaries, editorials, review articles, case reports, neuro-images of interest, book reviews and letters to the editor. Acta Neurologica Belgica is the official journal of the following national societies: Belgian Neurological Society Belgian Society for Neuroscience Belgian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology Belgian Pediatric Neurology Society Belgian Study Group of Multiple Sclerosis Belgian Stroke Council Belgian Headache Society Belgian Study Group of Neuropathology
期刊最新文献
Clinical and radiological characteristics of calcified cerebral embolism: a large case series including 242 calcified cerebral embolism. Ocular Myasthenia gravis: what predicts secondary generalization? Preliminary observations in cortical excitability changes using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), it's correlation with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in subjects with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Advancements in diagnosing Post-concussion Syndrome: insights into epidemiology, pathophysiology, neuropathology, neuroimaging, and salivary biomarkers. Association of disability, walking, manual dexterity, and quality of life with sexual dysfunction in multiple sclerosis patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1