Point-of-Care Potassium Measurement vs Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiography for Hyperkalemia Detection.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE American Journal of Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4037/ajcc2025597
Chin Lin, Chien-Chou Chen, Chin-Sheng Lin, Hung-Sheng Shang, Chia-Cheng Lee, Tom Chau, Shih-Hua Lin
{"title":"Point-of-Care Potassium Measurement vs Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiography for Hyperkalemia Detection.","authors":"Chin Lin, Chien-Chou Chen, Chin-Sheng Lin, Hung-Sheng Shang, Chia-Cheng Lee, Tom Chau, Shih-Hua Lin","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2025597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hyperkalemia can be detected by point-of-care (POC) blood testing and by artificial intelligence- enabled electrocardiography (ECG). These 2 methods of detecting hyperkalemia have not been compared.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the accuracy of POC and ECG potassium measurements for hyperkalemia detection in patients with critical illness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study involved intensive care patients in an academic medical center from October 2020 to September 2021. Patients who had 12-lead ECG, POC potassium measurement, and central laboratory potassium measurement within 1 hour were included. The POC potassium measurements were obtained from arterial blood gas analysis; ECG potassium measurements were calculated by a previously developed deep learning model. Hyperkalemia was defined as a central laboratory potassium measurement of 5.5 mEq/L or greater.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen patients with hyperkalemia and 252 patients without hyperkalemia were included. The POC and ECG potassium measurements were available about 35 minutes earlier than central laboratory results. Correlation with central laboratory potassium measurement was better for POC testing than for ECG (mean absolute errors of 0.211 mEq/L and 0.684 mEq/L, respectively). For POC potassium measurement, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to detect hyperkalemia was 0.933, sensitivity was 73.3%, and specificity was 98.4%. For ECG potassium measurement, AUC was 0.884, sensitivity was 93.3%, and specificity was 63.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ECG potassium measurement, with its high sensitivity and coverage rate, may be used initially and followed by POC potassium measurement for rapid detection of life-threatening hyperkalemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":"34 1","pages":"41-51"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2025597","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hyperkalemia can be detected by point-of-care (POC) blood testing and by artificial intelligence- enabled electrocardiography (ECG). These 2 methods of detecting hyperkalemia have not been compared.

Objective: To determine the accuracy of POC and ECG potassium measurements for hyperkalemia detection in patients with critical illness.

Methods: This retrospective study involved intensive care patients in an academic medical center from October 2020 to September 2021. Patients who had 12-lead ECG, POC potassium measurement, and central laboratory potassium measurement within 1 hour were included. The POC potassium measurements were obtained from arterial blood gas analysis; ECG potassium measurements were calculated by a previously developed deep learning model. Hyperkalemia was defined as a central laboratory potassium measurement of 5.5 mEq/L or greater.

Results: Fifteen patients with hyperkalemia and 252 patients without hyperkalemia were included. The POC and ECG potassium measurements were available about 35 minutes earlier than central laboratory results. Correlation with central laboratory potassium measurement was better for POC testing than for ECG (mean absolute errors of 0.211 mEq/L and 0.684 mEq/L, respectively). For POC potassium measurement, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to detect hyperkalemia was 0.933, sensitivity was 73.3%, and specificity was 98.4%. For ECG potassium measurement, AUC was 0.884, sensitivity was 93.3%, and specificity was 63.5%.

Conclusions: The ECG potassium measurement, with its high sensitivity and coverage rate, may be used initially and followed by POC potassium measurement for rapid detection of life-threatening hyperkalemia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于检测高钾血症的护理点血钾测量与人工智能心电图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The editors of the American Journal of Critical Care (AJCC) invite authors to submit original manuscripts describing investigations, advances, or observations from all specialties related to the care of critically and acutely ill patients. Papers promoting collaborative practice and research are encouraged. Manuscripts will be considered on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere and have been submitted solely to AJCC.
期刊最新文献
Correction. A 12-Lead Electrocardiography Patch for Continuous Arrhythmia Monitoring: A Case Example. Clinical Pearls. Discussion Guide for the McDermott Article. From Moral Distress to Moral Integrity: Qualitative Evaluation of a New Moral Conflict Assessment Tool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1