Use of Machine Learning Models to Predict Microaspiration Measured by Tracheal Pepsin A.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE American Journal of Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4037/ajcc2025349
Annette Bourgault, Ilana Logvinov, Chang Liu, Rui Xie, Jan Powers, Mary Lou Sole
{"title":"Use of Machine Learning Models to Predict Microaspiration Measured by Tracheal Pepsin A.","authors":"Annette Bourgault, Ilana Logvinov, Chang Liu, Rui Xie, Jan Powers, Mary Lou Sole","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2025349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enteral feeding intolerance, a common type of gastrointestinal dysfunction leading to underfeeding, is associated with increased mortality. Tracheal pepsin A, an indicator of microaspiration, was found in 39% of patients within 24 hours of enteral feeding. Tracheal pepsin A is a potential biomarker of enteral feeding intolerance.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify predictors of microaspiration (tracheal or oral pepsin A). It was hypothesized that variables predicting the presence of tracheal pepsin A might be similar to predictors of enteral feeding intolerance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this secondary analysis, machine learning models were fit for 283 adults receiving mechanical ventilation who had tracheal and oral aspirates obtained every 12 hours for up to 14 days. Pepsin A levels were measured using the proteolytic enzyme assay method, and values of 6.25 ng/mL or higher were classified as indicating microaspiration. Demographics, comorbidities, and variables associated with enteral feeding were analyzed with 3 machine learning models-random forest, XGBoost, and support vector machines with recursive feature elimination-using 5-fold cross-validation tuning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Random forest for tracheal pepsin A was the best-performing model (area under the curve, 0.844 [95% CI, 0.792-0.897]; accuracy, 87.55%). The top 20 predictors of tracheal pepsin A were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Four predictor variables for tracheal pepsin A (microaspiration) are also reported predictors of enteral feeding intolerance, supporting the exploration of tracheal pepsin A as a potential biomarker of enteral feeding intolerance. Identification of predictor variables using machine learning models may facilitate treatment of patients at risk for enteral feeding intolerance.</p>","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":"34 1","pages":"67-71"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2025349","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Enteral feeding intolerance, a common type of gastrointestinal dysfunction leading to underfeeding, is associated with increased mortality. Tracheal pepsin A, an indicator of microaspiration, was found in 39% of patients within 24 hours of enteral feeding. Tracheal pepsin A is a potential biomarker of enteral feeding intolerance.

Objective: To identify predictors of microaspiration (tracheal or oral pepsin A). It was hypothesized that variables predicting the presence of tracheal pepsin A might be similar to predictors of enteral feeding intolerance.

Methods: In this secondary analysis, machine learning models were fit for 283 adults receiving mechanical ventilation who had tracheal and oral aspirates obtained every 12 hours for up to 14 days. Pepsin A levels were measured using the proteolytic enzyme assay method, and values of 6.25 ng/mL or higher were classified as indicating microaspiration. Demographics, comorbidities, and variables associated with enteral feeding were analyzed with 3 machine learning models-random forest, XGBoost, and support vector machines with recursive feature elimination-using 5-fold cross-validation tuning.

Results: Random forest for tracheal pepsin A was the best-performing model (area under the curve, 0.844 [95% CI, 0.792-0.897]; accuracy, 87.55%). The top 20 predictors of tracheal pepsin A were identified.

Conclusion: Four predictor variables for tracheal pepsin A (microaspiration) are also reported predictors of enteral feeding intolerance, supporting the exploration of tracheal pepsin A as a potential biomarker of enteral feeding intolerance. Identification of predictor variables using machine learning models may facilitate treatment of patients at risk for enteral feeding intolerance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用机器学习模型预测气管胃蛋白酶A测量的微吸。
背景:肠内喂养不耐受是一种常见的导致进食不足的胃肠功能障碍,与死亡率增加有关。肠内喂养24小时内,有39%的患者出现气管胃蛋白酶A(微吸入指标)。气管胃蛋白酶A是肠内喂养不耐受的潜在生物标志物。目的:确定微吸入(气管或口服胃蛋白酶A)的预测因素。我们假设预测气管胃蛋白酶A存在的变量可能与预测肠内喂养不耐受的变量相似。方法:在这项二次分析中,机器学习模型适用于283名接受机械通气的成年人,这些成年人每12小时进行一次气管和口腔吸入,持续14天。采用蛋白水解酶测定法测定胃蛋白酶A水平,值为6.25 ng/mL或更高为微量吸进。人口统计学、合并症和与肠内喂养相关的变量使用3种机器学习模型进行分析——随机森林、XGBoost和递归特征消除的支持向量机——使用5倍交叉验证调优。结果:气管胃蛋白酶A的随机森林模型表现最佳(曲线下面积0.844 [95% CI, 0.792-0.897];准确性,87.55%)。确定了气管胃蛋白酶A的前20个预测因子。结论:气管胃蛋白酶A(微吸)的四个预测变量也被报道为肠内喂养不耐受的预测变量,支持探索气管胃蛋白酶A作为肠内喂养不耐受的潜在生物标志物。使用机器学习模型识别预测变量可能有助于治疗有肠内喂养不耐受风险的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The editors of the American Journal of Critical Care (AJCC) invite authors to submit original manuscripts describing investigations, advances, or observations from all specialties related to the care of critically and acutely ill patients. Papers promoting collaborative practice and research are encouraged. Manuscripts will be considered on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere and have been submitted solely to AJCC.
期刊最新文献
Calling Attention to the Practice of Acute and Critical Care Nursing. Correction. A 12-Lead Electrocardiography Patch for Continuous Arrhythmia Monitoring: A Case Example. Clinical Pearls. Discussion Guide for the McDermott Article.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1