Motivations for obtaining advance provision of medication abortion in the United States: a qualitative study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202580
Dana M Johnson, Sruthi Ramaswamy, Rebecca Gomperts, Abigail R A Aiken
{"title":"Motivations for obtaining advance provision of medication abortion in the United States: a qualitative study.","authors":"Dana M Johnson, Sruthi Ramaswamy, Rebecca Gomperts, Abigail R A Aiken","doi":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advance provision of medication abortion, or the prescription of mifepristone and misoprostol before pregnancy occurs, is an unexplored care model aimed at expanding abortion access. We examine motivations for obtaining advance provision from the online telemedicine service, Aid Access, which supports people in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between May and November 2023, we conducted semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 39 people who obtained advance provision between January 2022 and April 2023. Interviews were transcribed and we conducted a thematic analysis to assess individual motivations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were motivated to obtain medications because of the <i>Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization (Dobbs</i>) draft opinion leak and eventual decision. Participants expressed concerns about access to abortion under current and future abortion restrictions. Concerns about restrictions prompted people to make a backup plan for themselves and loved ones, and participants compared advance provision to other emergency medications and practices. Some participants were motivated to have medications on hand because pregnancy would be either unsafe or difficult. Others were trying to become pregnant, but because of their health histories they were cognisant of the health risks of a desired pregnancy. Overall, participants were motivated to take back control of their reproductive autonomy in the face of inevitable abortion bans.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The need for autonomy, resistance and reassurance were woven throughout participant's motivations for obtaining advance provision. The <i>Dobbs</i> decision acted as a catalyst for action to take back reproductive autonomy and prepare for a lack of access to abortion care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9219,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202580","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Advance provision of medication abortion, or the prescription of mifepristone and misoprostol before pregnancy occurs, is an unexplored care model aimed at expanding abortion access. We examine motivations for obtaining advance provision from the online telemedicine service, Aid Access, which supports people in the United States.

Methods: Between May and November 2023, we conducted semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 39 people who obtained advance provision between January 2022 and April 2023. Interviews were transcribed and we conducted a thematic analysis to assess individual motivations.

Results: Participants were motivated to obtain medications because of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization (Dobbs) draft opinion leak and eventual decision. Participants expressed concerns about access to abortion under current and future abortion restrictions. Concerns about restrictions prompted people to make a backup plan for themselves and loved ones, and participants compared advance provision to other emergency medications and practices. Some participants were motivated to have medications on hand because pregnancy would be either unsafe or difficult. Others were trying to become pregnant, but because of their health histories they were cognisant of the health risks of a desired pregnancy. Overall, participants were motivated to take back control of their reproductive autonomy in the face of inevitable abortion bans.

Conclusions: The need for autonomy, resistance and reassurance were woven throughout participant's motivations for obtaining advance provision. The Dobbs decision acted as a catalyst for action to take back reproductive autonomy and prepare for a lack of access to abortion care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国药物流产提前提供的动机:一项定性研究。
背景:提前提供药物流产,或在怀孕前开具米非司酮和米索前列醇处方,是一种未探索的旨在扩大流产可及性的护理模式。我们研究了从在线远程医疗服务“援助访问”获取预先规定的动机,该服务为美国人提供支持。方法:在2023年5月至11月期间,我们对39名在2022年1月至2023年4月期间获得预付款的人进行了半结构化的深度访谈。访谈记录下来,我们进行了专题分析,以评估个人动机。结果:Dobbs诉杰克逊妇女健康组织(Dobbs)意见草案泄露和最终决定促使参与者获得药物。与会者对在当前和未来堕胎限制下获得堕胎的机会表示关切。对限制的担忧促使人们为自己和亲人制定备用计划,参与者将预先提供的药物与其他紧急药物和做法进行了比较。一些参与者的动机是手头有药物,因为怀孕要么不安全,要么很困难。其他人试图怀孕,但由于他们的健康史,他们认识到期望怀孕的健康风险。总的来说,面对不可避免的堕胎禁令,参与者有动力收回对生殖自主权的控制。结论:自主性、抵抗性和安慰性的需求贯穿于参与者获得预先供应的动机之中。多布斯案的判决起到了催化剂的作用,促使人们采取行动,收回生育自主权,并为无法获得堕胎护理做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health Medicine-Reproductive Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health is a multiprofessional journal that promotes sexual and reproductive health and wellbeing, and best contraceptive practice, worldwide. It publishes research, debate and comment to inform policy and practice, and recognises the importance of professional-patient partnership.
期刊最新文献
Understanding patient experiences during gynaecological procedures: a qualitative exploratory study. Understanding women from ethnic minorities' perspectives about contraception in the UK: a qualitative study using a participatory action research approach with community research link workers. Reusable menstrual hygiene products may lead to underdiagnosis of heavy menstrual bleeding: a randomised trial. Lifestyle risk reduction engagement during interconception: a qualitative descriptive study of women's preferences. Response to the letter: 'Sexual and reproductive health clinical consultations: preconception care' by Chingara et al.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1