{"title":"Impact of Relative Dose Intensity of Enfortumab Vedotin for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.","authors":"Nobuki Furubayashi, Takahito Negishi, Manabu Mochida, Atsuhiro Kijima, Harumichi Katsuki, Motonobu Nakamura","doi":"10.21873/invivo.13843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>The impact of enfortumab vedotin (EV) dose reduction and/or interruption on its efficacy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) is unclear.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with advanced UC who received EV after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors from December 2021 to June 2024. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the calculated relative dose intensity (RDI): RDI<50%, RDI ≥50 to <80%, and RDI ≥80%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 26 patients (male, n=15; median age, 72 years) were enrolled. The RDI was categorized as follows: ≥80% (n=13; 50.0%), ≥50 to <80% (n=7; 26.9%), and <50% (n=6; 23.1%). There were no marked differences in the overall response (p=0.921) or disease control rates (p=0.859) among the three groups categorized by the RDI. A log-rank test revealed no significant differences in either the progression-free survival (p=0.309) or the overall survival (p=0.704) according to RDI. There were no marked differences in the incidence of any-grade adverse events (AEs) (p=0.405) or grade ≥3 AEs (p=0.018) according to RDI. There were significant differences in the incidence of any-grade cutaneous AEs (p=0.038) and grade ≥3 cutaneous AEs (p=0.007) according to RDI. A multivariate analysis revealed that ECOG PS≥2 (p=0.009) and mixed UC (p=0.011) were independently associated with the prognosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite frequent dose reductions and interruptions required to manage treatment-emergent AEs during EV therapy, these adjustments did not significantly impair the drug's efficacy in patients with advanced UC.</p>","PeriodicalId":13364,"journal":{"name":"In vivo","volume":"39 1","pages":"411-418"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705150/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In vivo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13843","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/aim: The impact of enfortumab vedotin (EV) dose reduction and/or interruption on its efficacy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) is unclear.
Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with advanced UC who received EV after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors from December 2021 to June 2024. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the calculated relative dose intensity (RDI): RDI<50%, RDI ≥50 to <80%, and RDI ≥80%.
Results: A total of 26 patients (male, n=15; median age, 72 years) were enrolled. The RDI was categorized as follows: ≥80% (n=13; 50.0%), ≥50 to <80% (n=7; 26.9%), and <50% (n=6; 23.1%). There were no marked differences in the overall response (p=0.921) or disease control rates (p=0.859) among the three groups categorized by the RDI. A log-rank test revealed no significant differences in either the progression-free survival (p=0.309) or the overall survival (p=0.704) according to RDI. There were no marked differences in the incidence of any-grade adverse events (AEs) (p=0.405) or grade ≥3 AEs (p=0.018) according to RDI. There were significant differences in the incidence of any-grade cutaneous AEs (p=0.038) and grade ≥3 cutaneous AEs (p=0.007) according to RDI. A multivariate analysis revealed that ECOG PS≥2 (p=0.009) and mixed UC (p=0.011) were independently associated with the prognosis.
Conclusion: Despite frequent dose reductions and interruptions required to manage treatment-emergent AEs during EV therapy, these adjustments did not significantly impair the drug's efficacy in patients with advanced UC.
期刊介绍:
IN VIVO is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to bring together original high quality works and reviews on experimental and clinical biomedical research within the frames of physiology, pathology and disease management.
The topics of IN VIVO include: 1. Experimental development and application of new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures; 2. Pharmacological and toxicological evaluation of new drugs, drug combinations and drug delivery systems; 3. Clinical trials; 4. Development and characterization of models of biomedical research; 5. Cancer diagnosis and treatment; 6. Immunotherapy and vaccines; 7. Radiotherapy, Imaging; 8. Tissue engineering, Regenerative medicine; 9. Carcinogenesis.