Leonie M Becker, Joyce Peper, Dirk-Jan van Ginkel, Daniël C Overduin, Hendrik W van Es, Benno J M W Rensing, Leo Timmers, Jurriën M Ten Berg, Firdaus A A Mohamed Hoesein, Tim Leiner, Martin J Swaans
{"title":"Coronary CTA and CT-FFR in trans-catheter aortic valve implantation candidates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Leonie M Becker, Joyce Peper, Dirk-Jan van Ginkel, Daniël C Overduin, Hendrik W van Es, Benno J M W Rensing, Leo Timmers, Jurriën M Ten Berg, Firdaus A A Mohamed Hoesein, Tim Leiner, Martin J Swaans","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-11211-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Screening for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) could prevent unnecessary invasive coronary angiography (ICA) procedures during work-up for trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) improves CCTA accuracy in chest pain patients. However, its reliability in the TAVI population is unknown. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses CCTA and CT-FFR in TAVI candidates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched for studies regarding CCTA and/or CT-FFR in TAVI candidates. Primary endpoint was correct identification and rule-out of obstructive CAD. Results were pooled in a meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four articles were part of the meta-analysis, reporting results for CCTA and CT-FFR in 7235 and 1269 patients, respectively. Reference standard was mostly anatomical severity of CAD. At patient level, pooled CCTA sensitivity was 94.0% and specificity 72.4%. CT-FFR sensitivity was 93.2% and specificity 70.3% with substantial variation between studies. However, in studies that compared both, CT-FFR performed better than CCTA. Sensitivity of CCTA versus CT-FFR was 74.9% versus 83.9%, and specificity was 65.5% versus 89.8%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Negative CCTA accurately rules out CAD in the TAVI population. CCTA could lead to significant reduction in pre-TAVI ICA, but false positives remain high. Diagnostic accuracy of CT-FFR was comparable to that of CCTA in our meta-analyses, but in studies performing a direct comparison, CT-FFR performed better than CCTA. However, as most studies were small and used CT-FFR software exclusively available for research, a large study on CT-FFR in TAVI work-up using commercially available CT-FFR software would be appropriate before considering routine implementation.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Coronary artery disease (CAD) screening with invasive coronary angiography before trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is often retrospectively unnecessary, revealing no obstructive CAD. Findings Coronary CTA ruled out CAD in approximately half of TAVI candidates. CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) performed similarly overall but better than coronary CTA in direct comparison. Clinical relevance Addition of coronary CTA to TAVI planning-CT to screen for obstructive CAD could reduce negative invasive coronary angiographies in TAVI work-up. CT-FFR could reduce false-positive coronary CTA results, improving its gatekeeper function in this population, but more data is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"1552-1569"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11211-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Screening for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) could prevent unnecessary invasive coronary angiography (ICA) procedures during work-up for trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) improves CCTA accuracy in chest pain patients. However, its reliability in the TAVI population is unknown. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses CCTA and CT-FFR in TAVI candidates.
Methods: PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched for studies regarding CCTA and/or CT-FFR in TAVI candidates. Primary endpoint was correct identification and rule-out of obstructive CAD. Results were pooled in a meta-analysis.
Results: Thirty-four articles were part of the meta-analysis, reporting results for CCTA and CT-FFR in 7235 and 1269 patients, respectively. Reference standard was mostly anatomical severity of CAD. At patient level, pooled CCTA sensitivity was 94.0% and specificity 72.4%. CT-FFR sensitivity was 93.2% and specificity 70.3% with substantial variation between studies. However, in studies that compared both, CT-FFR performed better than CCTA. Sensitivity of CCTA versus CT-FFR was 74.9% versus 83.9%, and specificity was 65.5% versus 89.8%.
Conclusions: Negative CCTA accurately rules out CAD in the TAVI population. CCTA could lead to significant reduction in pre-TAVI ICA, but false positives remain high. Diagnostic accuracy of CT-FFR was comparable to that of CCTA in our meta-analyses, but in studies performing a direct comparison, CT-FFR performed better than CCTA. However, as most studies were small and used CT-FFR software exclusively available for research, a large study on CT-FFR in TAVI work-up using commercially available CT-FFR software would be appropriate before considering routine implementation.
Key points: Question Coronary artery disease (CAD) screening with invasive coronary angiography before trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is often retrospectively unnecessary, revealing no obstructive CAD. Findings Coronary CTA ruled out CAD in approximately half of TAVI candidates. CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) performed similarly overall but better than coronary CTA in direct comparison. Clinical relevance Addition of coronary CTA to TAVI planning-CT to screen for obstructive CAD could reduce negative invasive coronary angiographies in TAVI work-up. CT-FFR could reduce false-positive coronary CTA results, improving its gatekeeper function in this population, but more data is necessary.
目的:通过冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影(CCTA)筛查阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD),可以避免在经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的检查过程中进行不必要的侵入性冠状动脉造影(ICA)。ct衍生的分数血流储备(CT-FFR)提高胸痛患者的CCTA准确性。然而,其在TAVI人群中的可靠性尚不清楚。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了TAVI患者的CCTA和CT-FFR。方法:检索PubMed、Embase和Web of Science中有关TAVI患者CCTA和/或CT-FFR的研究。主要终点是正确识别和排除阻塞性CAD。结果汇总在荟萃分析中。结果:34篇文章被纳入meta分析,分别报告了7235例和1269例患者的CCTA和CT-FFR结果。参考标准多为CAD的解剖严重程度。在患者水平上,CCTA敏感性为94.0%,特异性为72.4%。CT-FFR敏感性为93.2%,特异性为70.3%,研究间差异较大。然而,在比较两者的研究中,CT-FFR的表现优于CCTA。CCTA与CT-FFR的敏感性分别为74.9%和83.9%,特异性分别为65.5%和89.8%。结论:CCTA阴性准确地排除了TAVI人群的CAD。CCTA可以显著减少tavi前ICA,但假阳性仍然很高。在我们的荟萃分析中,CT-FFR的诊断准确性与CCTA相当,但在进行直接比较的研究中,CT-FFR的诊断准确性优于CCTA。然而,由于大多数研究规模较小,并且使用了专门用于研究的CT-FFR软件,因此在考虑常规实施之前,使用市售的CT-FFR软件对TAVI工作中的CT-FFR进行大型研究是合适的。经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)前的冠状动脉疾病(CAD)有创冠状动脉造影筛查通常是回顾性的不必要的,显示没有阻塞性CAD。冠状动脉CTA排除了大约一半的TAVI患者的CAD。ct衍生的分数血流储备(CT-FFR)总体上表现相似,但在直接比较中优于冠状动脉CTA。临床意义冠脉CTA联合TAVI计划- ct筛查阻塞性CAD可减少TAVI检查中冠脉造影阴性。CT-FFR可以减少冠状动脉CTA假阳性结果,改善其在该人群中的看门人功能,但需要更多的数据。
期刊介绍:
European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field.
This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies.
From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.