Robotic liver parenchymal transection techniques: a comprehensive overview and classification.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Robotic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1007/s11701-024-02200-5
Marco Palucci, Fabio Giannone, Gabriela Del Angel-Millán, Mariantonietta Alagia, Celeste Del Basso, Marco Lodin, Igor Monsellato, Federico Sangiuolo, Gianluca Cassese, Fabrizio Panaro
{"title":"Robotic liver parenchymal transection techniques: a comprehensive overview and classification.","authors":"Marco Palucci, Fabio Giannone, Gabriela Del Angel-Millán, Mariantonietta Alagia, Celeste Del Basso, Marco Lodin, Igor Monsellato, Federico Sangiuolo, Gianluca Cassese, Fabrizio Panaro","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02200-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robotic liver surgery is experiencing a period of great development, but some hurdles still need to be overcome. Parenchymal transection remains one of the most technically challenging steps. The lack of dedicated instruments and the flourishing of several techniques didn't allow surgeons to reach a standard technique so far. The aim of the present paper is to provide an overview of the different robotic liver transection techniques described to date, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each one. We conducted an extensive search on PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science, inserting the following keywords: \"robotic liver transection, robotic hepatic transection\" and focusing particularly on technical reports and paper regarding new surgical methods. This search resulted in a total of 13 different surgical techniques. All the methods described can be classified into two categories the \"hybrid techniques\" and the \"fully robotic techniques\" which are based, respectively, on the combined use of laparoscopic and robotic instrumentation or exclusively robotic devices. Another fundamental difference is the division between \"one-surgeon\" and \"two-surgeon techniques\", which depends on the level of expertise required of the assistant surgeon at the operating table. This is the first comprehensive review on this topic. Although the existing literature does not allow one technique to be established as superior to the others, the adoption of a standardized method of robotic hepatic transection is highly desirable to optimize surgical results and to allow better comparability of outcomes within the scientific community.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02200-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Robotic liver surgery is experiencing a period of great development, but some hurdles still need to be overcome. Parenchymal transection remains one of the most technically challenging steps. The lack of dedicated instruments and the flourishing of several techniques didn't allow surgeons to reach a standard technique so far. The aim of the present paper is to provide an overview of the different robotic liver transection techniques described to date, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each one. We conducted an extensive search on PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science, inserting the following keywords: "robotic liver transection, robotic hepatic transection" and focusing particularly on technical reports and paper regarding new surgical methods. This search resulted in a total of 13 different surgical techniques. All the methods described can be classified into two categories the "hybrid techniques" and the "fully robotic techniques" which are based, respectively, on the combined use of laparoscopic and robotic instrumentation or exclusively robotic devices. Another fundamental difference is the division between "one-surgeon" and "two-surgeon techniques", which depends on the level of expertise required of the assistant surgeon at the operating table. This is the first comprehensive review on this topic. Although the existing literature does not allow one technique to be established as superior to the others, the adoption of a standardized method of robotic hepatic transection is highly desirable to optimize surgical results and to allow better comparability of outcomes within the scientific community.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人肝实质横切技术:全面概述与分类。
机器人肝脏手术正在经历一个巨大的发展时期,但仍有一些障碍需要克服。实质横切仍然是技术上最具挑战性的步骤之一。到目前为止,专用器械的缺乏和几种技术的繁荣使外科医生无法达到标准技术。本文的目的是提供迄今为止描述的不同机器人肝脏横断技术的概述,突出每个技术的优点和缺点。我们在PubMed, Scopus和Web of Science上进行了广泛的搜索,插入以下关键词:“机器人肝脏横断,机器人肝脏横断”,并特别关注有关新手术方法的技术报告和论文。这一搜索结果产生了13种不同的手术技术。所描述的所有方法都可以分为两类:“混合技术”和“完全机器人技术”,它们分别基于腹腔镜和机器人仪器的联合使用或完全机器人设备。另一个根本的区别是“一位外科医生”和“两位外科医生技术”的区分,这取决于手术台上助理外科医生的专业水平。这是对这一主题的第一次全面回顾。尽管现有文献不允许一种技术优于其他技术,但采用一种标准化的机器人肝横断方法是非常可取的,可以优化手术结果,并使科学界的结果具有更好的可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
期刊最新文献
Huscher modified technique for robotic pancreaticojejunostomy: a video report. Comparison of perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy among the da Vinci, hinotori, and Hugo robot-assisted surgery systems. Democratization in abdominal ablation therapies: The impact of percutaneous robotic assistance on accuracy-A systematic review. Feasibility of robotic surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Improved positioning in robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using the EDGE MP1000 surgical robot.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1