State Medicaid Policies Governing Access to Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) and MOUD Treatment Use in a Large Sample of People Who Inject Drugs in 20 U.S. States.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Substance Use & Misuse Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1080/10826084.2024.2440365
Courtney R Yarbrough, Hannah L F Cooper, Stephanie Beane, Regine Haardörfer, Umed Ibragimov, Danielle F Haley, Sabriya Linton, Sarah Landes, Rashunda Lewis, Catlainn Sionean, Janet R Cummings
{"title":"State Medicaid Policies Governing Access to Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) and MOUD Treatment Use in a Large Sample of People Who Inject Drugs in 20 U.S. States.","authors":"Courtney R Yarbrough, Hannah L F Cooper, Stephanie Beane, Regine Haardörfer, Umed Ibragimov, Danielle F Haley, Sabriya Linton, Sarah Landes, Rashunda Lewis, Catlainn Sionean, Janet R Cummings","doi":"10.1080/10826084.2024.2440365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People who inject drugs (PWID) are especially vulnerable to harms from opioid use disorder (OUD). Medications for OUD (MOUD) effectively reduce overdose and infectious disease transmission risks.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigate whether state Medicaid coverage for methadone and buprenorphine is related to past-year MOUD use among PWID using cross-sectional, multilevel analyses with individual-level data on PWID from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's 2018 National HIV Behavioral Surveillance. The sample included 8,142 PWID aged 18-64 who reported daily opioid use from 22 U.S. metropolitan areas. Our outcome was any self-reported MOUD use in the past 12 months. Exposures were state Medicaid coverage and prior authorization requirements for methadone and buprenorphine. We interacted these exposures with PWID race/ethnicity, insurance status, and spatial access to treatment and harm reduction resources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with PWID in states without Medicaid methadone coverage, odds of past-year MOUD use were 73% (<i>p</i><0.05) higher among PWID in states with methadone coverage requiring prior authorization and 80% (<i>p</i><0.05) higher among PWID in states with coverage without prior authorization. Insured PWID were twice as likely to report MOUD use than uninsured PWID, with no statistically significant differences between Medicaid versus other insurance. Medicaid prior authorization requirements for buprenorphine were not significantly associated with MOUD use. Non-Hispanic Black PWID were significantly less likely to use MOUD than non-Hispanic White and Hispanic PWID.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>State Medicaid methadone coverage was strongly associated with higher odds that PWID utilized MOUD, suggesting that expanding methadone insurance coverage could improve MOUD treatment in a vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":22088,"journal":{"name":"Substance Use & Misuse","volume":" ","pages":"531-541"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825274/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Use & Misuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2024.2440365","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People who inject drugs (PWID) are especially vulnerable to harms from opioid use disorder (OUD). Medications for OUD (MOUD) effectively reduce overdose and infectious disease transmission risks.

Objective: We investigate whether state Medicaid coverage for methadone and buprenorphine is related to past-year MOUD use among PWID using cross-sectional, multilevel analyses with individual-level data on PWID from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's 2018 National HIV Behavioral Surveillance. The sample included 8,142 PWID aged 18-64 who reported daily opioid use from 22 U.S. metropolitan areas. Our outcome was any self-reported MOUD use in the past 12 months. Exposures were state Medicaid coverage and prior authorization requirements for methadone and buprenorphine. We interacted these exposures with PWID race/ethnicity, insurance status, and spatial access to treatment and harm reduction resources.

Results: Compared with PWID in states without Medicaid methadone coverage, odds of past-year MOUD use were 73% (p<0.05) higher among PWID in states with methadone coverage requiring prior authorization and 80% (p<0.05) higher among PWID in states with coverage without prior authorization. Insured PWID were twice as likely to report MOUD use than uninsured PWID, with no statistically significant differences between Medicaid versus other insurance. Medicaid prior authorization requirements for buprenorphine were not significantly associated with MOUD use. Non-Hispanic Black PWID were significantly less likely to use MOUD than non-Hispanic White and Hispanic PWID.

Conclusions: State Medicaid methadone coverage was strongly associated with higher odds that PWID utilized MOUD, suggesting that expanding methadone insurance coverage could improve MOUD treatment in a vulnerable population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国 20 个州关于阿片类药物使用障碍 (MOUD) 药物获取的州医疗补助政策以及注射吸毒者大样本中的 MOUD 治疗使用情况。
背景:注射吸毒者(PWID)特别容易受到阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的伤害。药物治疗OUD (mod)有效降低用药过量和传染病传播风险。目的:我们使用来自疾病控制和预防中心2018年全国艾滋病毒行为监测的PWID个人层面数据的横断面、多水平分析,调查美沙酮和丁丙诺啡的州医疗补助覆盖率是否与PWID过去一年的mod使用有关。样本包括来自美国22个大都市地区的8142名年龄在18-64岁之间的PWID,他们报告每天使用阿片类药物。我们的结果是在过去12个月里任何自我报告的mod使用情况。暴露是国家医疗补助覆盖范围和事先批准美沙酮和丁丙诺啡的要求。我们将这些暴露与PWID种族/民族、保险状况和获得治疗和减少伤害资源的空间途径相互作用。结果:与没有医疗补助美沙酮覆盖的州的PWID相比,过去一年使用mod的几率为73% (pp结论:国家医疗补助美沙酮覆盖与PWID使用mod的几率较高密切相关,这表明扩大美沙酮保险覆盖范围可以改善弱势人群的mod治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Substance Use & Misuse
Substance Use & Misuse 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 50 years, Substance Use & Misuse (formerly The International Journal of the Addictions) has provided a unique international multidisciplinary venue for the exchange of original research, theories, policy analyses, and unresolved issues concerning substance use and misuse (licit and illicit drugs, alcohol, nicotine, and eating disorders). Guest editors for special issues devoted to single topics of current concern are invited. Topics covered include: Clinical trials and clinical research (treatment and prevention of substance misuse and related infectious diseases) Epidemiology of substance misuse and related infectious diseases Social pharmacology Meta-analyses and systematic reviews Translation of scientific findings to real world clinical and other settings Adolescent and student-focused research State of the art quantitative and qualitative research Policy analyses Negative results and intervention failures that are instructive Validity studies of instruments, scales, and tests that are generalizable Critiques and essays on unresolved issues Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.
期刊最新文献
Age-Related Motives for Substance Use and Outcomes Among Veteran Patients Receiving Detoxification Services: A Longitudinal Study. App Use and Abstinence Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Sociodemographic Variables in a Psychological Intervention to Quit Smoking. The Association of Risk-Related Behaviors and Mental Health Symptomatology on Problematic Alcohol Use Among U.S. Army Reserve and National Guard Soldiers. Khat Chewing Topography: An Exploratory Study of Its Constituents and Contextual Factors. Spatial Patterns of Delivery Hospitalizations with Opioid Use Disorder in Pennsylvania.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1