Noninvasive machine-learning models for the detection of lesion-specific ischemia in patients with stable angina with intermediate stenosis severity on coronary CT angiography.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1007/s13246-024-01503-z
Hiroshi Hamasaki, Hidetaka Arimura, Yuzo Yamasaki, Takayuki Yamamoto, Mitsuhiro Fukata, Tetsuya Matoba, Toyoyuki Kato, Kousei Ishigami
{"title":"Noninvasive machine-learning models for the detection of lesion-specific ischemia in patients with stable angina with intermediate stenosis severity on coronary CT angiography.","authors":"Hiroshi Hamasaki, Hidetaka Arimura, Yuzo Yamasaki, Takayuki Yamamoto, Mitsuhiro Fukata, Tetsuya Matoba, Toyoyuki Kato, Kousei Ishigami","doi":"10.1007/s13246-024-01503-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study proposed noninvasive machine-learning models for the detection of lesion-specific ischemia (LSI) in patients with stable angina with intermediate stenosis severity based on coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography. This single-center retrospective study analyzed 76 patients (99 vessels) with stable angina who underwent coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and had intermediate stenosis severity (40-69%) on invasive coronary angiography. LSI, defined as a resting full-cycle ratio < 0.86 or fractional flow reserve ≤ 0.80, was determined in 40 patients (46 vessels) using a hybrid resting full-cycle ratio-fractional flow reserve strategy. The resting full-cycle ratio and/or fractional flow reserve were measured using invasive coronary angiography as references for functional severity indices of coronary stenosis in the machine-learning models. LSI detection models were constructed using noninvasive machine-learning models that predicted the resting full-cycle ratio and fractional flow reserve by feeding machine-learning models with image features extracted from CCTA. The diagnostic performance of the proposed LSI detection models was assessed using a nested 10-fold cross-validation test. The LSI detection models with the highest diagnostic performance achieved an accuracy of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.94), sensitivity of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.86) and specificity of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.92, 1.00) on a vessel basis and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.95), 0.80 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.86) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.92, 1.00), respectively, on a patient basis. These findings suggest that LSI detection models with features extracted from CCTA can noninvasively detect LSI in patients with stable angina with intermediate stenosis severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48490,"journal":{"name":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-024-01503-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study proposed noninvasive machine-learning models for the detection of lesion-specific ischemia (LSI) in patients with stable angina with intermediate stenosis severity based on coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography. This single-center retrospective study analyzed 76 patients (99 vessels) with stable angina who underwent coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and had intermediate stenosis severity (40-69%) on invasive coronary angiography. LSI, defined as a resting full-cycle ratio < 0.86 or fractional flow reserve ≤ 0.80, was determined in 40 patients (46 vessels) using a hybrid resting full-cycle ratio-fractional flow reserve strategy. The resting full-cycle ratio and/or fractional flow reserve were measured using invasive coronary angiography as references for functional severity indices of coronary stenosis in the machine-learning models. LSI detection models were constructed using noninvasive machine-learning models that predicted the resting full-cycle ratio and fractional flow reserve by feeding machine-learning models with image features extracted from CCTA. The diagnostic performance of the proposed LSI detection models was assessed using a nested 10-fold cross-validation test. The LSI detection models with the highest diagnostic performance achieved an accuracy of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.94), sensitivity of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.86) and specificity of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.92, 1.00) on a vessel basis and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.95), 0.80 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.86) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.92, 1.00), respectively, on a patient basis. These findings suggest that LSI detection models with features extracted from CCTA can noninvasively detect LSI in patients with stable angina with intermediate stenosis severity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无创机器学习模型在冠状动脉CT造影中检测中度狭窄程度的稳定型心绞痛患者的病变特异性缺血。
本研究提出了一种无创机器学习模型,用于基于冠状动脉计算机断层扫描(CT)血管造影检测中度狭窄程度的稳定型心绞痛患者的病变特异性缺血(LSI)。本单中心回顾性研究分析了76例(99条血管)稳定性心绞痛患者,均行冠状动脉CT血管造影(CCTA),有创冠状动脉造影时狭窄程度为中等(40-69%)。LSI,定义为静息全周期比
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
110
期刊最新文献
Autoencoder based data clustering for identifying anomalous repetitive hand movements, and behavioral transition patterns in children. Guidance on selecting and evaluating AI auto-segmentation systems in clinical radiotherapy: insights from a six-vendor analysis. Evaluating the prognostic value of radiomics and clinical features in metastatic prostate cancer using [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. In-silico evaluation of the effect of set-up errors on dose delivery during mouse irradiations with a Cs-137 cell irradiator-based collimator system. Use of a virtual phantom to assess the capability of a treatment planning system to perform magnetic resonance image distortion correction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1