A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple dose, parallel study to investigate the effects of a cathepsin S inhibitor in celiac disease

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Cts-Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1111/cts.13901
Darren Bentley, Marie Mannino, Marianne Manchester, Priscila Camillo Teixeira, Bernhard Reis, Malcolm Boyce, Sandra Nagel
{"title":"A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple dose, parallel study to investigate the effects of a cathepsin S inhibitor in celiac disease","authors":"Darren Bentley,&nbsp;Marie Mannino,&nbsp;Marianne Manchester,&nbsp;Priscila Camillo Teixeira,&nbsp;Bernhard Reis,&nbsp;Malcolm Boyce,&nbsp;Sandra Nagel","doi":"10.1111/cts.13901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Celiac disease is a chronic, immune-mediated enteropathy with symptoms triggered by exposure to dietary gluten in genetically predisposed individuals. The only available management option is lifelong adherence to a gluten-free diet. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-center study tested the effects of the cathepsin S inhibitor RO5459072 on the immune response to a 13-day gluten challenge in 19 participants with celiac disease (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02679014). Nine participants in the RO5459072 arm received 100 mg study drug b.i.d. (200 mg daily); 10 received a placebo. The primary end point was the number of responders to the gluten challenge (defined as individuals with an increase in the number of gliadin-specific, IFNγ-secreting T cells detected using an ELISPOT assay). However, there was a weak response to the gluten challenge across both arms. Few participants had an increase in gliadin-specific, IFNγ-secreting T cells, and the antigen-specific responses (anti-tTG and anti-DGP antibodies) were weaker than expected in both arms. Therefore, the primary end point was not met, although the study was underpowered to detect a treatment effect under these circumstances. Pharmacodynamic findings suggested that RO5459072 had some beneficial effects. Fewer participants in the RO5459072 arm exhibited gliadin-specific IFNγ-secreting T cells after 6 days' gluten intake. Participants in the RO5459072 arm also showed decreased intestinal permeability, and a decrease in the number of circulating B cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells compared to baseline. Nevertheless, the absence of clear effects on the response to a gluten challenge indicates that inhibition of cathepsin S may not be an effective treatment strategy for celiac disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11686337/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.13901","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Celiac disease is a chronic, immune-mediated enteropathy with symptoms triggered by exposure to dietary gluten in genetically predisposed individuals. The only available management option is lifelong adherence to a gluten-free diet. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-center study tested the effects of the cathepsin S inhibitor RO5459072 on the immune response to a 13-day gluten challenge in 19 participants with celiac disease (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02679014). Nine participants in the RO5459072 arm received 100 mg study drug b.i.d. (200 mg daily); 10 received a placebo. The primary end point was the number of responders to the gluten challenge (defined as individuals with an increase in the number of gliadin-specific, IFNγ-secreting T cells detected using an ELISPOT assay). However, there was a weak response to the gluten challenge across both arms. Few participants had an increase in gliadin-specific, IFNγ-secreting T cells, and the antigen-specific responses (anti-tTG and anti-DGP antibodies) were weaker than expected in both arms. Therefore, the primary end point was not met, although the study was underpowered to detect a treatment effect under these circumstances. Pharmacodynamic findings suggested that RO5459072 had some beneficial effects. Fewer participants in the RO5459072 arm exhibited gliadin-specific IFNγ-secreting T cells after 6 days' gluten intake. Participants in the RO5459072 arm also showed decreased intestinal permeability, and a decrease in the number of circulating B cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells compared to baseline. Nevertheless, the absence of clear effects on the response to a gluten challenge indicates that inhibition of cathepsin S may not be an effective treatment strategy for celiac disease.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多剂量、平行研究,旨在研究组织蛋白酶S抑制剂在乳糜泻中的作用。
乳糜泻是一种慢性、免疫介导的肠病,在遗传易感个体中,暴露于饮食中麸质会引发症状。唯一可用的管理选择是终身坚持无麸质饮食。这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组、单中心研究测试了组织蛋白酶S抑制剂RO5459072对19名乳糜泻患者13天麸质挑战免疫反应的影响(ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02679014)。RO5459072组的9名参与者每日服用100 mg研究药物(每日200 mg);10人接受安慰剂治疗。主要终点是对谷蛋白攻击的应答者数量(定义为使用ELISPOT检测的麦胶蛋白特异性ifn γ分泌T细胞数量增加的个体)。然而,两只手臂对麸质挑战的反应都很弱。很少有参与者的麦胶蛋白特异性,ifn γ分泌T细胞增加,并且抗原特异性反应(抗ttg和抗dgp抗体)在两组中都弱于预期。因此,没有达到主要终点,尽管该研究在这些情况下检测治疗效果的能力不足。药效学结果表明,RO5459072具有一定的有益作用。在摄入面筋6天后,RO5459072组中较少的参与者表现出麦胶蛋白特异性ifn γ分泌T细胞。与基线相比,RO5459072组的参与者也表现出肠道通透性降低,循环B细胞、CD4+和CD8+ T细胞数量减少。然而,缺乏对麸质挑战反应的明确影响表明,组织蛋白酶S的抑制可能不是乳糜泻的有效治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
期刊最新文献
Inhibition of Tacrolimus Metabolism by Cannabidiol and Its Metabolites In Vitro A Randomized Hybrid-Effectiveness Trial Comparing Pharmacogenomics (PGx) to Standard Care: The PGx Applied to Chronic Pain Treatment in Primary Care (PGx-ACT) Trial AI In Action: Redefining Drug Discovery and Development Pharmacogenetic Information on Drug Labels of the Italian Agency of Medicines (AIFA): Actionability and Comparison Across Other Regulatory Agencies Pharmacokinetics of a Novel Piperaquine Dispersible Granules Formulation Under Fasting and Various Fed Conditions Versus Piperaquine Tablets When Fasted in Healthy Tanzanian Adults: A Randomized, Phase I Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1