Associations between rural hospital closures and acute and post-acute care access and outcomes.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.14426
Geoffrey J Hoffman, Jinkyung Ha, Zhaohui Fan, Jun Li
{"title":"Associations between rural hospital closures and acute and post-acute care access and outcomes.","authors":"Geoffrey J Hoffman, Jinkyung Ha, Zhaohui Fan, Jun Li","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether rural hospital closures affected hospital and post-acute care (PAC) use and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>Using a staggered difference-in-differences design, we evaluated associations between 32 rural hospital closures and changes in county-level: (1) travel distances to and lengths of stay at hospitals; (2) functional limitations at and time from hospital discharge to start of PAC episode; (3) 30-day readmissions and mortality and hospitalizations for a fall-related injury; and (4) population-level hospitalization and death rates.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>100% Medicare claims and home health and skilled nursing facility clinical data to identify approximately 3 million discharges for older fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>We found that hospitals that closed compared to those remaining open served more minoritized, lower-income populations, including more Medicaid and fewer commercial patients, and had lower profit margins. Following a closure, quarterly hospitalization rates (111.6 quarterly hospitalizations per 10,000 older adults; 95% CI: 53.4, 170.9) and average hospital lengths of stay increased (0.34 days; 95% CI: 0.13, 0.56 days). We observed no change in the average distance between patients' residential ZIP code and the hospital used (0.29 miles; 95% CI: -1.06, 1.64 miles); average number of standardized ADL limitations at PAC (0.08 SDs from the pre-closure average; 95% CI: -0.12, 0.28 SDs); or PAC time to start (0.02 days; 95% CI: -1.2, 1.2 days). Among more isolated hospitals, closures were associated with an increase in the likelihood of readmission (0.10 percentage-points; 95% CI: 0.00, 0.19).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Closures were not associated with notably worsened health care access, function, or health, potentially because closures triggered care delivery adjustments involving increased numbers of patients seeking out higher quality care.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14426"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14426","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether rural hospital closures affected hospital and post-acute care (PAC) use and outcomes.

Study setting and design: Using a staggered difference-in-differences design, we evaluated associations between 32 rural hospital closures and changes in county-level: (1) travel distances to and lengths of stay at hospitals; (2) functional limitations at and time from hospital discharge to start of PAC episode; (3) 30-day readmissions and mortality and hospitalizations for a fall-related injury; and (4) population-level hospitalization and death rates.

Data sources and analytic sample: 100% Medicare claims and home health and skilled nursing facility clinical data to identify approximately 3 million discharges for older fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries.

Principal findings: We found that hospitals that closed compared to those remaining open served more minoritized, lower-income populations, including more Medicaid and fewer commercial patients, and had lower profit margins. Following a closure, quarterly hospitalization rates (111.6 quarterly hospitalizations per 10,000 older adults; 95% CI: 53.4, 170.9) and average hospital lengths of stay increased (0.34 days; 95% CI: 0.13, 0.56 days). We observed no change in the average distance between patients' residential ZIP code and the hospital used (0.29 miles; 95% CI: -1.06, 1.64 miles); average number of standardized ADL limitations at PAC (0.08 SDs from the pre-closure average; 95% CI: -0.12, 0.28 SDs); or PAC time to start (0.02 days; 95% CI: -1.2, 1.2 days). Among more isolated hospitals, closures were associated with an increase in the likelihood of readmission (0.10 percentage-points; 95% CI: 0.00, 0.19).

Conclusions: Closures were not associated with notably worsened health care access, function, or health, potentially because closures triggered care delivery adjustments involving increased numbers of patients seeking out higher quality care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农村医院关闭与急性和急性后护理机会和结果之间的关系。
目的:确定农村医院关闭是否影响医院和急症后护理(PAC)的使用和结局。研究设置和设计:采用交错差中差设计,我们评估了32家乡村医院关闭与县级变化之间的关系:(1)到医院的旅行距离和住院时间;(2)从出院到PAC发作开始的时间和时间的功能限制;(3) 30天内再入院、死亡和因跌倒受伤住院;(4)人口住院率和死亡率。数据来源和分析样本:100%医疗保险索赔和家庭健康和熟练护理机构的临床数据,以确定约300万老年医疗保险付费受益人的出院情况。主要发现:我们发现,与那些仍然开放的医院相比,关闭的医院服务于更多的少数族裔、低收入人群,包括更多的医疗补助和更少的商业病人,利润率也更低。关闭后,季度住院率(每10 000名老年人每季度住院111.6人次;95% CI: 53.4, 170.9),平均住院时间增加(0.34天;95% CI: 0.13, 0.56天)。我们观察到患者居住的邮政编码和使用的医院之间的平均距离没有变化(0.29英里;95% CI: -1.06, 1.64英里);PAC标准化ADL限制的平均数量(与关闭前平均值相比为0.08个SDs);95% CI: -0.12, 0.28 SDs);或PAC启动时间(0.02天;95% CI: -1.2, 1.2天)。在较为孤立的医院中,关闭与再入院可能性增加有关(0.10个百分点;95% ci: 0.00, 0.19)。结论:关闭与医疗服务的可及性、功能或健康状况的显著恶化无关,这可能是因为关闭引发了医疗服务的调整,涉及更多寻求更高质量医疗服务的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
期刊最新文献
Patient-Provider Race Concordance and Primary Care Suicide Risk Screening in the Veterans Health Administration. Recruitment and Retention of Rural Health Professionals in Minnesota. Identifying Barriers to Being Offered and Accepting a Telehealth Visit for Cancer Care: Unpacking the Multi-Levels of Documented Racial Disparities in Telehealth Use. Integrated health systems and medical care quality during the COVID-19 pandemic. Addressing Staffing Shortages in Nursing Homes: Does Relaxing Training and Licensing Requirements Increase Nurse Aide Staffing?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1