Impact of medical and recreational cannabis laws on inpatient visits for asthma.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.14427
Jayani Jayawardhana, Jose Fernandez
{"title":"Impact of medical and recreational cannabis laws on inpatient visits for asthma.","authors":"Jayani Jayawardhana, Jose Fernandez","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the impact of medical and recreational cannabis laws on inpatient visits for asthma and by payer-type.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>Quasi-experimental difference-in-differences regression analysis was conducted while accounting for variations in cannabis laws implementation timing by states. Inpatient visits for asthma in states with a given type of cannabis law were compared with those in states that did not implement the specific law. Four different cannabis laws were examined in the study-initial passage of medical cannabis law, opening of a medical cannabis dispensary, home cultivation of medical cannabis, and recreational cannabis legalization.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>State-level quarterly inpatient visit data for asthma patients were utilized from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Fast Stats database. The primary analysis included inpatient visits for asthma by all payer adult patients aged 19 and above in 38 states from 2005 to 2017, and the secondary analysis included inpatient visits for asthma by payer-type (i.e., private, Medicare, Medicaid, uninsured).</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>States with medical cannabis dispensaries and legalized recreational cannabis experienced 14.12% (2.14; 95% CI, 0.74-3.53; p < 0.01) and 20.45% (3.08; 95% CI, 1.47-4.69; p < 0.001) increases in inpatient visits for asthma compared with states without these policies, respectively. These increases in inpatient visits for asthma were primarily driven by populations covered by Medicare and private insurance, with Medicare population showing larger effects of both recreational cannabis laws and medical cannabis dispensaries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>States with medical cannabis dispensaries and legalized recreational cannabis experienced higher rate of inpatient visits for asthma compared with states without these policies. Clinicians and policymakers should consider strategies to curb adverse health outcomes of cannabis, that is likely to result in increased costs of healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14427"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14427","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the impact of medical and recreational cannabis laws on inpatient visits for asthma and by payer-type.

Study setting and design: Quasi-experimental difference-in-differences regression analysis was conducted while accounting for variations in cannabis laws implementation timing by states. Inpatient visits for asthma in states with a given type of cannabis law were compared with those in states that did not implement the specific law. Four different cannabis laws were examined in the study-initial passage of medical cannabis law, opening of a medical cannabis dispensary, home cultivation of medical cannabis, and recreational cannabis legalization.

Data sources and analytic sample: State-level quarterly inpatient visit data for asthma patients were utilized from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Fast Stats database. The primary analysis included inpatient visits for asthma by all payer adult patients aged 19 and above in 38 states from 2005 to 2017, and the secondary analysis included inpatient visits for asthma by payer-type (i.e., private, Medicare, Medicaid, uninsured).

Principal findings: States with medical cannabis dispensaries and legalized recreational cannabis experienced 14.12% (2.14; 95% CI, 0.74-3.53; p < 0.01) and 20.45% (3.08; 95% CI, 1.47-4.69; p < 0.001) increases in inpatient visits for asthma compared with states without these policies, respectively. These increases in inpatient visits for asthma were primarily driven by populations covered by Medicare and private insurance, with Medicare population showing larger effects of both recreational cannabis laws and medical cannabis dispensaries.

Conclusions: States with medical cannabis dispensaries and legalized recreational cannabis experienced higher rate of inpatient visits for asthma compared with states without these policies. Clinicians and policymakers should consider strategies to curb adverse health outcomes of cannabis, that is likely to result in increased costs of healthcare.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗和娱乐用大麻法对因哮喘住院病人的影响。
目的:探讨医疗和娱乐大麻法律对哮喘住院患者就诊的影响,并按付款人类型进行分析。研究设置和设计:在考虑各州大麻法律实施时间差异的情况下,进行准实验差异中差异回归分析。在实施特定类型大麻法的州,与未实施特定法律的州比较了因哮喘住院的患者访问量。在研究中审查了四种不同的大麻法:医用大麻法的初步通过、医用大麻药房的开设、医用大麻的家庭种植和娱乐性大麻的合法化。数据来源和分析样本:来自医疗保健成本和利用项目快速统计数据库的各州哮喘患者季度住院就诊数据。主要分析包括2005年至2017年38个州19岁及以上的所有付款人的哮喘住院就诊,次要分析包括按付款人类型(即私人、医疗保险、医疗补助、无保险)的哮喘住院就诊。主要调查结果:拥有医用大麻药房和娱乐性大麻合法化的国家的大麻使用率为14.12% (2.14;95% ci, 0.74-3.53;p结论:与没有这些政策的州相比,拥有医用大麻药房和娱乐性大麻合法化的州因哮喘住院的比率更高。临床医生和决策者应考虑采取战略,遏制大麻的不良健康后果,这可能导致医疗保健费用增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
期刊最新文献
Patient-Provider Race Concordance and Primary Care Suicide Risk Screening in the Veterans Health Administration. Recruitment and Retention of Rural Health Professionals in Minnesota. Identifying Barriers to Being Offered and Accepting a Telehealth Visit for Cancer Care: Unpacking the Multi-Levels of Documented Racial Disparities in Telehealth Use. Integrated health systems and medical care quality during the COVID-19 pandemic. Addressing Staffing Shortages in Nursing Homes: Does Relaxing Training and Licensing Requirements Increase Nurse Aide Staffing?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1