Students' perceptions of nursing academics' cultural humility: An online cross-sectional study

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Nurse Education Today Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106560
Majd T. Mrayyan
{"title":"Students' perceptions of nursing academics' cultural humility: An online cross-sectional study","authors":"Majd T. Mrayyan","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Understanding cultural humility is a challenge, even in academic nursing settings. Nursing academics are the driving force behind students and the next generation of nurses' awareness and practice of cultural humility.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The study investigated the predictors and differences of nursing academics' cultural humility in nursing education, as perceived by nursing students.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A cross-sectional research design was used.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Two hundred eighty-one nursing students were conveniently recruited for the study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Nursing students completed an online survey about the measured variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nursing students expressed a consensus regarding the importance of cultural humility among nursing academics in the context of nursing education; however, their overall agreement was relatively low (Mean = 3.86/5, SE = 0.037). Being trained in private hospitals and senior students predicted the perceived nursing academics' cultural humility in nursing education (<em>t</em>-test = 11.29, <em>p</em>-value = 0.001, <em>R</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 0.035, <em>adjusted R</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 0.028). Senior nursing students highly rated most of the items when measuring the differences in perceived nursing academics' cultural humility.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The preparation of nursing students by nursing academics is essential for promoting cultural humility within nursing education.</div></div><div><h3>Patient or public contribution</h3><div>No Patient or Public Contribution. The study involved nursing students who were enrolled in academic higher education nursing programs at different universities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 106560"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691724004702","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Understanding cultural humility is a challenge, even in academic nursing settings. Nursing academics are the driving force behind students and the next generation of nurses' awareness and practice of cultural humility.

Aim

The study investigated the predictors and differences of nursing academics' cultural humility in nursing education, as perceived by nursing students.

Design

A cross-sectional research design was used.

Participants

Two hundred eighty-one nursing students were conveniently recruited for the study.

Methods

Nursing students completed an online survey about the measured variables.

Results

Nursing students expressed a consensus regarding the importance of cultural humility among nursing academics in the context of nursing education; however, their overall agreement was relatively low (Mean = 3.86/5, SE = 0.037). Being trained in private hospitals and senior students predicted the perceived nursing academics' cultural humility in nursing education (t-test = 11.29, p-value = 0.001, R2 = 0.035, adjusted R2 = 0.028). Senior nursing students highly rated most of the items when measuring the differences in perceived nursing academics' cultural humility.

Conclusion

The preparation of nursing students by nursing academics is essential for promoting cultural humility within nursing education.

Patient or public contribution

No Patient or Public Contribution. The study involved nursing students who were enrolled in academic higher education nursing programs at different universities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生对护理学者文化谦逊的认知:一项在线横断面研究。
背景:理解文化谦逊是一个挑战,即使在学术护理设置。护理学者是学生和下一代护士意识和实践文化谦逊的推动力。目的:探讨护生在护理教育中护理学者文化谦逊的预测因素及差异。设计:采用横断面研究设计。参与者:231名护理专业学生被方便地招募到研究中。方法:对护理专业学生进行在线问卷调查。结果:护生对文化谦逊在护理教育中的重要性表达了共识;但总体一致性较低(Mean = 3.86/5, SE = 0.037)。私立医院教育背景和高年级学生对护理学者在护理教育中的文化谦逊感有预测作用(t检验= 11.29,p值= 0.001,R2 = 0.035,调整后R2 = 0.028)。高年级护生在测量感知护理学者文化谦逊的差异时,对大部分项目都给予了很高的评价。结论:护理学者对护生的准备是促进护理教育中谦逊文化的必要条件。患者或公众捐赠:无患者或公众捐赠。这项研究涉及了在不同大学就读学术高等教育护理课程的护理专业学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Education Today
Nurse Education Today 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
349
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives. Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Nursing curricula in Indonesia and Scandinavia: What can we learn from each other to strengthen nursing education Nursing in tune: Evaluation of the effectiveness of podcasts as an educational tool for undergraduate students - A cross-sectional study Editorial Board Registered nurses' experiences of the graduate nurse residency program: A qualitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1