Moderating Effects of Coping Styles on the Relationship Between Nursing Stress and Mental Health Among NICU Nurses.

Peter Barr
{"title":"Moderating Effects of Coping Styles on the Relationship Between Nursing Stress and Mental Health Among NICU Nurses.","authors":"Peter Barr","doi":"10.1016/j.jogn.2024.12.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine whether coping styles moderate the relationship between nursing stress and mental health in NICU nurses.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Four Level 3 and 4 NICUs in New South Wales, Australia.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 123 NICU nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants completed self-report questionnaire measures of nursing stress (Nursing Stress Scale), dispositional stress coping styles (Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory [Brief COPE]), and mental health (Mental Health Inventory-21). I conducted exploratory factor analysis of the Brief COPE to show that it comprises four factors: support-oriented coping, problem-oriented coping, emotion-oriented coping, and denial-oriented coping. I used hierarchical multiple regressions with interactions and simple slopes analyses to conduct moderation analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>I found that the interaction between nursing stress and problem-oriented coping style (i.e., positive reframing, planning, religion, and active coping) was significant and explained further variance in psychological distress (ΔR<sup>2</sup> = .05, p = .013), emotional well-being (ΔR<sup>2</sup> = .03, p = .027), and hopelessness (ΔR<sup>2</sup> = .06, p = .005). The moderation effects on mental health were significantly different at high versus low levels of problem-oriented coping for psychological distress (t = 2.55, p = .011), emotional well-being (t = 2.26, p = .024), and hopelessness (t = 2.89, p = .004). The other coping styles did not have significant moderator effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Problem-oriented coping buffered the ill effects of nursing stress on positive and negative dimensions of mental health in NICU nurses. Accordingly, cognitive behavioral therapy may be the most effective counseling modality for NICU nurses. Understanding how and why problem-oriented coping might not be effective in certain clinical situations that are controllable and theoretically solvable should inform further mixed methods research in NICU nurses.</p>","PeriodicalId":54903,"journal":{"name":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2024.12.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine whether coping styles moderate the relationship between nursing stress and mental health in NICU nurses.

Design: Cross-sectional observational study.

Setting: Four Level 3 and 4 NICUs in New South Wales, Australia.

Participants: A total of 123 NICU nurses.

Methods: Participants completed self-report questionnaire measures of nursing stress (Nursing Stress Scale), dispositional stress coping styles (Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory [Brief COPE]), and mental health (Mental Health Inventory-21). I conducted exploratory factor analysis of the Brief COPE to show that it comprises four factors: support-oriented coping, problem-oriented coping, emotion-oriented coping, and denial-oriented coping. I used hierarchical multiple regressions with interactions and simple slopes analyses to conduct moderation analyses.

Results: I found that the interaction between nursing stress and problem-oriented coping style (i.e., positive reframing, planning, religion, and active coping) was significant and explained further variance in psychological distress (ΔR2 = .05, p = .013), emotional well-being (ΔR2 = .03, p = .027), and hopelessness (ΔR2 = .06, p = .005). The moderation effects on mental health were significantly different at high versus low levels of problem-oriented coping for psychological distress (t = 2.55, p = .011), emotional well-being (t = 2.26, p = .024), and hopelessness (t = 2.89, p = .004). The other coping styles did not have significant moderator effects.

Conclusion: Problem-oriented coping buffered the ill effects of nursing stress on positive and negative dimensions of mental health in NICU nurses. Accordingly, cognitive behavioral therapy may be the most effective counseling modality for NICU nurses. Understanding how and why problem-oriented coping might not be effective in certain clinical situations that are controllable and theoretically solvable should inform further mixed methods research in NICU nurses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿重症监护室护士应对方式对护理压力与心理健康关系的调节作用
目的:探讨新生儿重症监护室护士应对方式是否调节护理压力与心理健康的关系。设计:横断面观察性研究。地点:澳大利亚新南威尔士州的4个3级和4级nicu。参与者:共有123名新生儿重症监护病房护士。方法:完成护理压力自述问卷(护理压力量表)、气质性压力应对方式问卷(问题经验应对倾向问卷[Brief COPE])和心理健康问卷(心理健康问卷-21)。我对Brief COPE进行了探索性因子分析,发现它包含四个因子:支持导向的应对、问题导向的应对、情绪导向的应对和拒绝导向的应对。我使用层次多元回归与交互和简单的斜率分析进行适度分析。结果:我发现护理压力与问题导向应对方式(即积极重构、计划、宗教和积极应对)之间的相互作用显著,并进一步解释了心理困扰(ΔR2 = 0.05, p = 0.013)、情绪健康(ΔR2 = 0.03, p = 0.027)和绝望(ΔR2 = 0.06, p = 0.005)的差异。心理困扰(t = 2.55, p = 0.011)、情绪健康(t = 2.26, p = 0.024)和绝望(t = 2.89, p = 0.004)的问题导向应对水平高低对心理健康的调节作用有显著差异。其他应对方式无显著调节作用。结论:问题导向应对可以缓冲护理压力对新生儿重症监护病房护士心理健康正、负两个维度的不良影响。因此,认知行为疗法可能是NICU护士最有效的咨询方式。了解问题导向应对在某些可控制和理论上可解决的临床情况下如何以及为什么可能无效,可以为进一步的NICU护士混合方法研究提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: JOGNN is a premier resource for health care professionals committed to clinical scholarship that advances the health care of women and newborns. With a focus on nursing practice, JOGNN addresses the latest research, practice issues, policies, opinions, and trends in the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns. This peer-reviewed scientific and technical journal is highly respected for groundbreaking articles on important - and sometimes controversial - issues. Articles published in JOGNN emphasize research evidence and clinical practice, building both science and clinical applications. JOGNN seeks clinical, policy and research manuscripts on the evidence supporting current best practice as well as developing or emerging practice trends. A balance of quantitative and qualitative research with an emphasis on biobehavioral outcome studies and intervention trials is desired. Manuscripts are welcomed on all subjects focused on the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns.
期刊最新文献
Call to Action to Quantify Non-Severe and Severe Maternal Morbidity. Ventilatory Assistance Before Umbilical Cord Clamping in Extremely Preterm Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Barriers to Diagnosis and Innovations in Care for Endometriosis. Nursing Safety on the Job: Workplace Violence and Personal Protection. Qualitative Study of Experiences with an Interprofessional Perinatal Care Team Among Women Who Used Substances During the Perinatal Period.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1