[A new validated ophthalmic patient questionnaire for cataract and lens surgery : CLOQ: cataract and lens ophthalmic questionnaire].

E Fabian, Ph Eberwein, M Müller, K Fabian, J Weisensee, A Langenbucher, J-H Heine
{"title":"[A new validated ophthalmic patient questionnaire for cataract and lens surgery : CLOQ: cataract and lens ophthalmic questionnaire].","authors":"E Fabian, Ph Eberwein, M Müller, K Fabian, J Weisensee, A Langenbucher, J-H Heine","doi":"10.1007/s00347-024-02155-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The new patient cataract and lens ophthalmic questionnaire (CLOQ) determines subjective patient satisfaction before and after cataract surgery according to item response theory (IRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 317 patients with bilateral cataract surgery and implantation of different intraocular lens (IOL) types were included. The questionnaire (37 questions) is divided into questions on visual acuity-relevant quality of life (VRQoL), quality of vision (QoV), spectacle dependence, and general satisfaction. For all questions, five response categories are available. Analysis is performed by determining the model parameters/item characteristic curves. Testing of the model is performed by expected score curves, infit/outfit statistics, and determination of reliability and Cronbach's α.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The IRT analyses for the QoL and QoV questions showed 1. a clear order of threshold parameters in the multilevel response scale; 2. a good fit of the response model of the empirical and the expected score curves; 3. unidimensionality, with values of < 1 for the mean square in- and outfit statistics; and 4. reliability of F<sub>WLE</sub> = 0.87 and 0.71, respectively. The post-surgical improvement is clearly evident in the higher person parameters, spectacle dependency, and better visual acuity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Standard calculations were performed for model parameters, model tests, and reliability based on a partial credit model. The results confirm the suitability for evaluation of subjective patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":72808,"journal":{"name":"Die Ophthalmologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die Ophthalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-024-02155-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The new patient cataract and lens ophthalmic questionnaire (CLOQ) determines subjective patient satisfaction before and after cataract surgery according to item response theory (IRT).

Methods: A total of 317 patients with bilateral cataract surgery and implantation of different intraocular lens (IOL) types were included. The questionnaire (37 questions) is divided into questions on visual acuity-relevant quality of life (VRQoL), quality of vision (QoV), spectacle dependence, and general satisfaction. For all questions, five response categories are available. Analysis is performed by determining the model parameters/item characteristic curves. Testing of the model is performed by expected score curves, infit/outfit statistics, and determination of reliability and Cronbach's α.

Results: The IRT analyses for the QoL and QoV questions showed 1. a clear order of threshold parameters in the multilevel response scale; 2. a good fit of the response model of the empirical and the expected score curves; 3. unidimensionality, with values of < 1 for the mean square in- and outfit statistics; and 4. reliability of FWLE = 0.87 and 0.71, respectively. The post-surgical improvement is clearly evident in the higher person parameters, spectacle dependency, and better visual acuity.

Conclusion: Standard calculations were performed for model parameters, model tests, and reliability based on a partial credit model. The results confirm the suitability for evaluation of subjective patient satisfaction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Recurrent strabismus with nystagmus : Serious problem-Easy to overlook]. [A new validated ophthalmic patient questionnaire for cataract and lens surgery : CLOQ: cataract and lens ophthalmic questionnaire]. [Gender distribution of scientific contributions at German ophthalmological conferences-a baseline study]. [High blood pressure rarely occurs alone]. [Academics in ophthalmology : An analysis of the gender distribution at German university hospitals and the Clinician Scientist Program].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1