Epidemiology and Characteristics of Meniscal Tears in Patients With Combined ACL and Medial Collateral Ligament Injuries Versus Isolated ACL Tears: A Case-Control Study From the Francophone Arthroscopic Society

Alexandre Hardy, Emilie Berard, Benjamin Freychet, Corentin Herce, Charles Kajetanek, Christian Lutz, Mohamad K. Moussa, Thomas Neri, Matthieu Ollivier, Nicolas Bouguennec, Etienne Cavaignac
{"title":"Epidemiology and Characteristics of Meniscal Tears in Patients With Combined ACL and Medial Collateral Ligament Injuries Versus Isolated ACL Tears: A Case-Control Study From the Francophone Arthroscopic Society","authors":"Alexandre Hardy, Emilie Berard, Benjamin Freychet, Corentin Herce, Charles Kajetanek, Christian Lutz, Mohamad K. Moussa, Thomas Neri, Matthieu Ollivier, Nicolas Bouguennec, Etienne Cavaignac","doi":"10.1177/03635465241296879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:The co-occurrence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture with medial collateral ligament (MCL) rupture is a compound injury that can be associated with meniscal tears.Purpose:To report the characteristics of meniscal tears in knees with isolated ACL versus combined ACL and MCL injuries, analyzing their frequency, distribution by site, and lesion type.Study Design:Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.Method:This prospective, multicenter, case-control study, conducted across 10 hospitals in France as part of a symposium of the national French Society of Arthroscopy, compared patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with and without MCL injury. The 2 groups were matched by sex, age (±3 years), and body mass index (±3) to minimize imbalances between groups. All operations were performed by senior surgeons, who systematically explored for ramp, root, and other types of meniscal lesions as well as corner injuries. The primary outcome focused on meniscal injury frequency, with secondary outcomes examining lesion sites and types. A subgroup analysis was performed to compare these outcomes depending on the injury chronicity. Acute ACL injuries were those treated within 3 months of injury, and chronic lesions were those treated after this period.Results:A total of 722 patients were included, with a mean age of 30.32 ± 10.78 years. Meniscal injuries were observed more frequently in the ACL+MCL group, with 217 of 408 patients (53.2%) affected, compared with 130 of 314 patients (41.4%) in the isolated ACL group ( P = .001). Lateral meniscal lesions were significantly more common in the ACL+MCL group at 41.9% compared with 20.8% in the isolated ACL group ( P < .001). The same pattern was found independent of chronicity. Medial meniscal lesions were significantly more common in the isolated ACL group regardless of chronicity status. In terms of types of medial lesions, the ACL+MCL group primarily experienced longitudinal (45.9%) and ramp lesions (28.7%), whereas the isolated ACL group experienced mostly ramp lesion (58.3%; P < .001). No significant difference was observed in the distribution of lateral meniscal injury types.Conclusion:This study demonstrated a higher prevalence of meniscal injuries associated with ACL+MCL injuries compared with isolated ACL injuries, with lateral meniscal lesions particularly more frequent, independent of chronicity status.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241296879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:The co-occurrence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture with medial collateral ligament (MCL) rupture is a compound injury that can be associated with meniscal tears.Purpose:To report the characteristics of meniscal tears in knees with isolated ACL versus combined ACL and MCL injuries, analyzing their frequency, distribution by site, and lesion type.Study Design:Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.Method:This prospective, multicenter, case-control study, conducted across 10 hospitals in France as part of a symposium of the national French Society of Arthroscopy, compared patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with and without MCL injury. The 2 groups were matched by sex, age (±3 years), and body mass index (±3) to minimize imbalances between groups. All operations were performed by senior surgeons, who systematically explored for ramp, root, and other types of meniscal lesions as well as corner injuries. The primary outcome focused on meniscal injury frequency, with secondary outcomes examining lesion sites and types. A subgroup analysis was performed to compare these outcomes depending on the injury chronicity. Acute ACL injuries were those treated within 3 months of injury, and chronic lesions were those treated after this period.Results:A total of 722 patients were included, with a mean age of 30.32 ± 10.78 years. Meniscal injuries were observed more frequently in the ACL+MCL group, with 217 of 408 patients (53.2%) affected, compared with 130 of 314 patients (41.4%) in the isolated ACL group ( P = .001). Lateral meniscal lesions were significantly more common in the ACL+MCL group at 41.9% compared with 20.8% in the isolated ACL group ( P < .001). The same pattern was found independent of chronicity. Medial meniscal lesions were significantly more common in the isolated ACL group regardless of chronicity status. In terms of types of medial lesions, the ACL+MCL group primarily experienced longitudinal (45.9%) and ramp lesions (28.7%), whereas the isolated ACL group experienced mostly ramp lesion (58.3%; P < .001). No significant difference was observed in the distribution of lateral meniscal injury types.Conclusion:This study demonstrated a higher prevalence of meniscal injuries associated with ACL+MCL injuries compared with isolated ACL injuries, with lateral meniscal lesions particularly more frequent, independent of chronicity status.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联合前交叉韧带和内侧副韧带损伤与孤立前交叉韧带撕裂患者的半月板撕裂的流行病学和特征:来自法语国家关节镜学会的病例对照研究
背景:前交叉韧带(ACL)断裂与内侧副韧带(MCL)断裂同时发生是一种复合损伤,可能与半月板撕裂有关。目的:报道单纯性前交叉韧带损伤与前交叉韧带和中交叉韧带合并损伤的膝关节半月板撕裂的特点,分析其发生频率、部位分布和病变类型。研究设计:横断面研究;证据水平,3。方法:这项前瞻性、多中心、病例对照研究在法国10家医院进行,作为法国国家关节镜学会研讨会的一部分,比较了有和没有MCL损伤的前交叉韧带重建患者。两组按性别、年龄(±3岁)和体重指数(±3)进行匹配,以尽量减少组间的不平衡。所有手术均由资深外科医生进行,他们系统地探索斜坡、根部和其他类型的半月板病变以及角损伤。主要结果集中于半月板损伤频率,次要结果检查病变部位和类型。根据损伤的慢性程度,进行亚组分析来比较这些结果。急性前交叉韧带损伤为3个月内治疗的损伤,慢性损伤为3个月后治疗的损伤。结果:共纳入722例患者,平均年龄30.32±10.78岁。ACL+MCL组的半月板损伤发生率更高,408例患者中有217例(53.2%),而单独ACL组的314例患者中有130例(41.4%)(P = 0.001)。外侧半月板病变在ACL+MCL组中更为常见,为41.9%,而孤立ACL组为20.8% (P <;措施)。同样的模式被发现与慢性无关。内侧半月板病变在孤立性前交叉韧带组中更为常见,无论其慢性状态如何。就内侧病变类型而言,ACL+MCL组主要为纵向病变(45.9%)和斜向病变(28.7%),而孤立ACL组主要为斜向病变(58.3%);P & lt;措施)。外侧半月板损伤类型分布差异无统计学意义。结论:本研究表明,与孤立的ACL损伤相比,与ACL+MCL损伤相关的半月板损伤发生率更高,外侧半月板病变尤其频繁,与慢性状态无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Failure Rates of SLAP Repair Compared With Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis for Young Military Patients With Type 2 SLAP at 10-Year Follow-up. Arthroscopic Findings After Osteochondral Allografts of the Knee: Proposed Classification Scheme and Associations With Graft Failure Combined Root and Body Lateral Meniscus Tears in the Adolescent Population: An Underrecognized and Underreported Tear Pattern Risk of Revision and Reoperation After ACL Reconstruction: Comparison of Quadriceps Tendon, Patellar Tendon, and Hamstring Autografts Stratified by Patient Sex and Age: A Cohort Study of 27,715 Patients From 2012 to 2023 A Novel Ultrasound-Guided Injection Strategy for Rapid Functional Recovery in Frozen Shoulder: A Multicenter Randomized Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1