Forecasting land use in urban Himalayas: a remote sensing-guided machine learning approach

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Earth Sciences Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1007/s12665-024-12060-9
Sadaf Fayaz, Akhlaq Amin Wani, Aasif Ali Gatoo, MA Islam, Shah Murtaza, Khursheed Ahmad Sofi, Parvez Ahmad Khan
{"title":"Forecasting land use in urban Himalayas: a remote sensing-guided machine learning approach","authors":"Sadaf Fayaz,&nbsp;Akhlaq Amin Wani,&nbsp;Aasif Ali Gatoo,&nbsp;MA Islam,&nbsp;Shah Murtaza,&nbsp;Khursheed Ahmad Sofi,&nbsp;Parvez Ahmad Khan","doi":"10.1007/s12665-024-12060-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Rapid urbanization in the Himalayan region due to advances in transportation, tourism and industry impacts natural resources causing its depletion. The problem gets aggravated in the urban regions located in the eco-fragile Himalayas. Srinagar being one of the largest urban hubs in the region with exceptionally high population growth rate, the complexities in monitoring land use and associated changes due to conventional methods further exacerbates these issues. Rapid and accurate mapping of land use land cover (LULC) is essentially required for effective green space management in urban landscapes. In this study an assessment of LULC using machine learning based classifiers was done. The present study assessed LULC using Sentinel-2 data through unsupervised K-means algorithm and supervised machine learning algorithms (Artificial Neural Network-ANN, Support Vector Machine- SVM, Random Forest-RF and Decision Tree-DT). Ground truth points collected through extensive field visits and high resolution Google Earth Pro were used for model generation/mapping (70%) and validation (30%). Map validation revealed that SVM (96.60%) had the highest overall accuracy followed by RF (95.86%), DT (95.33%), ANN (88.7%) and K-means (64.51%). F-Scores varied between classifiers on account of precision and recall for different classes. High values for F depicting performance of classification models were observed for all supervised classifiers except ANN which couldn’t effectively classify wastelands (F = 58.73%), SVM performed exceptionally well for agriculture and grassland (94.02%), Habitation (96.02%) and wasteland (96.42%). DT excelled in mapping vegetation (99.41%). Waterbody was classified accurately by all the classifiers (F = 100%) except ANN (99.73%). However, Snow and Agriculture Fallow were depicted well by ANN with F Score of 99.20% and 96.39% respectively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-12060-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid urbanization in the Himalayan region due to advances in transportation, tourism and industry impacts natural resources causing its depletion. The problem gets aggravated in the urban regions located in the eco-fragile Himalayas. Srinagar being one of the largest urban hubs in the region with exceptionally high population growth rate, the complexities in monitoring land use and associated changes due to conventional methods further exacerbates these issues. Rapid and accurate mapping of land use land cover (LULC) is essentially required for effective green space management in urban landscapes. In this study an assessment of LULC using machine learning based classifiers was done. The present study assessed LULC using Sentinel-2 data through unsupervised K-means algorithm and supervised machine learning algorithms (Artificial Neural Network-ANN, Support Vector Machine- SVM, Random Forest-RF and Decision Tree-DT). Ground truth points collected through extensive field visits and high resolution Google Earth Pro were used for model generation/mapping (70%) and validation (30%). Map validation revealed that SVM (96.60%) had the highest overall accuracy followed by RF (95.86%), DT (95.33%), ANN (88.7%) and K-means (64.51%). F-Scores varied between classifiers on account of precision and recall for different classes. High values for F depicting performance of classification models were observed for all supervised classifiers except ANN which couldn’t effectively classify wastelands (F = 58.73%), SVM performed exceptionally well for agriculture and grassland (94.02%), Habitation (96.02%) and wasteland (96.42%). DT excelled in mapping vegetation (99.41%). Waterbody was classified accurately by all the classifiers (F = 100%) except ANN (99.73%). However, Snow and Agriculture Fallow were depicted well by ANN with F Score of 99.20% and 96.39% respectively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测喜马拉雅城市土地利用:遥感引导的机器学习方法
由于交通、旅游业和工业的发展,喜马拉雅地区的快速城市化影响了自然资源,导致其枯竭。在生态脆弱的喜马拉雅地区的城市地区,这一问题更加严重。斯利那加是该地区最大的城市中心之一,人口增长率极高,监测土地使用的复杂性以及由于传统方法导致的相关变化进一步加剧了这些问题。快速、准确的土地利用、土地覆被(LULC)制图是城市绿地有效管理的基本要求。在本研究中,使用基于机器学习的分类器对LULC进行了评估。本研究利用Sentinel-2数据,通过无监督K-means算法和监督机器学习算法(人工神经网络- ann、支持向量机- SVM、随机森林- rf和决策树- dt)评估LULC。通过广泛的实地考察和高分辨率谷歌Earth Pro收集的地面真实点用于模型生成/制图(70%)和验证(30%)。地图验证表明,SVM(96.60%)的总体准确率最高,其次是RF(95.86%)、DT(95.33%)、ANN(88.7%)和K-means(64.51%)。f -分数在分类器之间的差异是由于不同类别的准确率和召回率。除了人工神经网络不能有效地对荒地进行分类(F = 58.73%)外,所有监督分类器的F值都很高,SVM在农业和草地(94.02%)、人居(96.02%)和荒地(96.42%)上表现特别好。DT在植被制图方面表现优异(99.41%)。除人工神经网络(ANN)分类准确率为99.73%外,其余分类器对水体的分类准确率均为100%。然而,人工神经网络对Snow和Agriculture休耕的描述效果较好,F值分别为99.20%和96.39%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of trace metal contamination in overbank sediments of the Witbank Coalfield, South Africa Evidence of anthropogenic and climate-related processes derived from metal contents in sediment cores from a heavily industrialized subtropical estuary Streamlining the monitoring and assessment of irrigation groundwater quality using machine learning techniques CNN-based calibration of discrete element method parameters for calcareous sand Development of modified beta distribution tailored for channel application at inflow boundary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1