Efficacy and safety of Aurantii Fructus Immaturus flavonoid Tablets vs. domperidone for functional dyspepsia: a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized controlled phase III trial.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.51821/87.4.13488
M Wei, Y Chai, H Shen, M Du, X Zhou, T Liu, X Yang, S Li, J Sun, Y Ge
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of Aurantii Fructus Immaturus flavonoid Tablets vs. domperidone for functional dyspepsia: a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized controlled phase III trial.","authors":"M Wei, Y Chai, H Shen, M Du, X Zhou, T Liu, X Yang, S Li, J Sun, Y Ge","doi":"10.51821/87.4.13488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical management of functional dyspepsia (FD) is challenging. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of Aurantii Fructus Immaturus flavonoid (AFIF) tablets vs. domperidone for FD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, doubledummy, positive-controlled trial recruited FD patients, who were randomized 1:1 to the AFIF (AFIF and domperidone placebo) and domperidone (domperidone and AFIF placebo) groups. The primary endpoint was the rate of disappearance of all four FD symptoms (postprandial feeling of fullness, early satiety, upper abdominal pain, and upper abdominal burning sensation) after 4 treatment weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally 120 and 119 patients were included in the AFIF and domperidone groups, respectively. The rates of disappearance of all four symptoms after 4 treatment weeks were 28.33% and 31.93% in the AFIF and domperidone groups, respectively (p=0.5748). The rate of disappearance of all four symptoms 4 weeks after treatment discontinuation was significantly higher in the AFIF (21.05%) compared with the domperidone group (4.39%, p=0.0002). The gastric emptying rates 2h after a meal were significantly increased in both AFIF (7.58%, p<0.0001) and domperidone (6.95%, p=0.0121) groups versus baseline, without a significant between-group difference (p=0.8457). Twenty-two (1 moderate) and 43 (3 moderate) adverse events occurred in the AFIF (19.17%) and domperidone (36.13%) groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The efficacy of AFIF tablets is similar to that of domperidone after 4 treatment weeks, while AFIF tablets may have a better safety profile than domperidone. Additionally, AFIF tablets have a significant advantage over domperidone in the rate of symptom disappearance 4 weeks after treatment discontinuation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7322,"journal":{"name":"Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica","volume":"87 4","pages":"484-493"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51821/87.4.13488","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The clinical management of functional dyspepsia (FD) is challenging. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of Aurantii Fructus Immaturus flavonoid (AFIF) tablets vs. domperidone for FD.

Methods: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, doubledummy, positive-controlled trial recruited FD patients, who were randomized 1:1 to the AFIF (AFIF and domperidone placebo) and domperidone (domperidone and AFIF placebo) groups. The primary endpoint was the rate of disappearance of all four FD symptoms (postprandial feeling of fullness, early satiety, upper abdominal pain, and upper abdominal burning sensation) after 4 treatment weeks.

Results: Totally 120 and 119 patients were included in the AFIF and domperidone groups, respectively. The rates of disappearance of all four symptoms after 4 treatment weeks were 28.33% and 31.93% in the AFIF and domperidone groups, respectively (p=0.5748). The rate of disappearance of all four symptoms 4 weeks after treatment discontinuation was significantly higher in the AFIF (21.05%) compared with the domperidone group (4.39%, p=0.0002). The gastric emptying rates 2h after a meal were significantly increased in both AFIF (7.58%, p<0.0001) and domperidone (6.95%, p=0.0121) groups versus baseline, without a significant between-group difference (p=0.8457). Twenty-two (1 moderate) and 43 (3 moderate) adverse events occurred in the AFIF (19.17%) and domperidone (36.13%) groups, respectively.

Conclusion: The efficacy of AFIF tablets is similar to that of domperidone after 4 treatment weeks, while AFIF tablets may have a better safety profile than domperidone. Additionally, AFIF tablets have a significant advantage over domperidone in the rate of symptom disappearance 4 weeks after treatment discontinuation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica
Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: The Journal Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica principally publishes peer-reviewed original manuscripts, reviews, letters to editors, book reviews and guidelines in the field of clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, including digestive oncology, digestive pathology, as well as nutrition. Pure animal or in vitro work will not be considered for publication in the Journal. Translational research papers (including sections of animal or in vitro work) are considered by the Journal if they have a clear relationship to or relevance for clinical hepato-gastroenterology (screening, disease mechanisms and/or new therapies). Case reports and clinical images will be accepted if they represent an important contribution to the description, the pathogenesis or the treatment of a specific gastroenterology or liver problem. The language of the Journal is English. Papers from any country will be considered for publication. Manuscripts submitted to the Journal should not have been published previously (in English or any other language), nor should they be under consideration for publication elsewhere. Unsolicited papers are peer-reviewed before it is decided whether they should be accepted, rejected, or returned for revision. Manuscripts that do not meet the presentation criteria (as indicated below) will be returned to the authors. Papers that go too far beyond the scope of the journal will be also returned to the authors by the editorial board generally within 2 weeks. The Journal reserves the right to edit the language of papers accepted for publication for clarity and correctness, and to make formal changes to ensure compliance with AGEB’s style. Authors have the opportunity to review such changes in the proofs.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of Aurantii Fructus Immaturus flavonoid Tablets vs. domperidone for functional dyspepsia: a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized controlled phase III trial. Essential to read from the editorial board. A case of paediatric seasonal eosinophilic oesophagitis. An unusual submucosal lesion. Aspiration thrombectomy of the hepatic veins in Budd Chiari Syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1