Fertility preservation options at cancer diagnosis; classifying use and decision-making in the United States.

IF 2.8 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1080/17446651.2024.2448789
Sarita Pathak, Paxton Voigt, Margot Bellon, Susan T Vadaparampil, Gwendolyn P Quinn
{"title":"Fertility preservation options at cancer diagnosis; classifying use and decision-making in the United States.","authors":"Sarita Pathak, Paxton Voigt, Margot Bellon, Susan T Vadaparampil, Gwendolyn P Quinn","doi":"10.1080/17446651.2024.2448789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Incidence rates for cancer among adolescent and young adults (AYA) have increased 30% since 1970. Declines in mortality underscore the importance of discussing fertility preservation (FP) options prior to receiving gonadotoxic treatments. National guidelines outline FP options including oocyte (OC), embryo (EC), and ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) for female AYA patients. Significant progress has led to changes in FP practices, initially limited to EC. Subsequently, OC was deemed non-experimental in 2013, followed by OTC in 2020. Despite these advancements and guideline recommendations, the availability and utilization of FP services vary.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Rapid review methodologies were employed to classify trends in female AYAs utilization of FP cryopreservation options following guideline updates. FP options reviewed include OC, EC, and OTC. Additionally, the review examined if aspects of the decision-making process relevant to FP were present.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Ten articles met inclusion criteria. Results suggest that the declassification of OTC has not necessarily increased its use and OC and EC appear to be most frequently used. The factors associated with decision making appear to have remained consistent with financial constraints having the most impact, followed by partner status and concerns about recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":12107,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"21-32"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17446651.2024.2448789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Incidence rates for cancer among adolescent and young adults (AYA) have increased 30% since 1970. Declines in mortality underscore the importance of discussing fertility preservation (FP) options prior to receiving gonadotoxic treatments. National guidelines outline FP options including oocyte (OC), embryo (EC), and ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) for female AYA patients. Significant progress has led to changes in FP practices, initially limited to EC. Subsequently, OC was deemed non-experimental in 2013, followed by OTC in 2020. Despite these advancements and guideline recommendations, the availability and utilization of FP services vary.

Areas covered: Rapid review methodologies were employed to classify trends in female AYAs utilization of FP cryopreservation options following guideline updates. FP options reviewed include OC, EC, and OTC. Additionally, the review examined if aspects of the decision-making process relevant to FP were present.

Expert opinion: Ten articles met inclusion criteria. Results suggest that the declassification of OTC has not necessarily increased its use and OC and EC appear to be most frequently used. The factors associated with decision making appear to have remained consistent with financial constraints having the most impact, followed by partner status and concerns about recurrence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症诊断时保留生育能力的选择;美国的分类使用和决策。
自1970年以来,青少年和年轻人(AYA)的癌症发病率增加了30%。死亡率的下降强调了在接受促性腺毒素治疗之前讨论生育保留(FP)选择的重要性。国家指南概述了女性AYA患者的FP选择,包括卵母细胞(OC),胚胎(EC)和卵巢组织冷冻保存(OTC)。重大进展导致FP实践的变化,最初仅限于EC。随后,2013年OC被认定为非实验性,2020年OTC也被认定为非实验性。尽管有这些进步和指南建议,但计划生育服务的可用性和利用率各不相同。所涵盖的领域:采用快速回顾方法对指南更新后女性aya使用FP冷冻保存选项的趋势进行分类。FP选项包括OC、EC和OTC。此外,审查审查了与计划生育有关的决策过程的各个方面是否存在。专家意见:10篇文章符合纳入标准。结果表明,OTC的解密并不一定会增加其使用,OC和EC似乎是最常用的。与决策有关的因素似乎与影响最大的财政限制保持一致,其次是伙伴地位和对复发的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism
Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Implicated in a plethora of regulatory dysfunctions involving growth and development, metabolism, electrolyte balances and reproduction, endocrine disruption is one of the highest priority research topics in the world. As a result, we are now in a position to better detect, characterize and overcome the damage mediated by adverse interaction with the endocrine system. Expert Review of Endocrinology and Metabolism (ISSN 1744-6651), provides extensive coverage of state-of-the-art research and clinical advancements in the field of endocrine control and metabolism, with a focus on screening, prevention, diagnostics, existing and novel therapeutics, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Complexities with diagnosis and management of symptomatic hypoglycemia during pregnancy post-bariatric surgery: a scoping review. Assessing diabetes awareness and health behaviors among adults in Jordan: a national cross-sectional study. Predictors of spontaneous puberty - guiding of puberty induction in Turner syndrome. Pelvic floor dysfunction in menopause: screening, evaluation and management. Normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism: a common disease in search of common standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1