Neonatal sepsis in Vietnam: Bacterial profiles and antibiotic susceptibility in a tertiary care setting.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES American journal of infection control Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2024.12.016
Thi Quynh Nga Nguyen, Thi Huong Giang Do, Thi Van Nguyen, Thao Nguyen Pham, Thi Bich Ngoc Hoang
{"title":"Neonatal sepsis in Vietnam: Bacterial profiles and antibiotic susceptibility in a tertiary care setting.","authors":"Thi Quynh Nga Nguyen, Thi Huong Giang Do, Thi Van Nguyen, Thao Nguyen Pham, Thi Bich Ngoc Hoang","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2024.12.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neonatal sepsis is a leading cause of newborn mortality, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. This study examines the bacterial etiologies and antibiotic resistance patterns of neonatal sepsis in a tertiary hospital in Vietnam.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at National Children's Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam from January 2021 to December 2022. All neonates with a clinical suspicion of sepsis and a confirmed positive blood culture were identified. Isolated pathogens were identified, and antibiotic susceptibility was assessed using standard protocols.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 202 neonates were diagnosed with proven sepsis. Among these, 75.2% of cases referred from other hospitals. Early-onset sepsis accounted for 15.8% of these infections. Gram-negative bacteria were responsible for 75.7% of the cases, with Klebsiella pneumoniae being the most prevalent pathogen (32.2%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (14.9%), and both Serratia marcescens and Escherichia coli (10.9% each). Gram-negative bacteria showed significant resistance to third-generation cephalosporins, carbapenems, while gram-positive bacteria demonstrated considerable resistance to clindamycin and oxacillin. However, most gram-positive isolates were susceptible to vancomycin, and gram-negative bacteria had lower resistance to colistin and fosfomycin.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight the critical importance of continuous surveillance and tailored antibiotic policies to combat neonatal sepsis effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2024.12.016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neonatal sepsis is a leading cause of newborn mortality, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. This study examines the bacterial etiologies and antibiotic resistance patterns of neonatal sepsis in a tertiary hospital in Vietnam.

Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at National Children's Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam from January 2021 to December 2022. All neonates with a clinical suspicion of sepsis and a confirmed positive blood culture were identified. Isolated pathogens were identified, and antibiotic susceptibility was assessed using standard protocols.

Results: In total, 202 neonates were diagnosed with proven sepsis. Among these, 75.2% of cases referred from other hospitals. Early-onset sepsis accounted for 15.8% of these infections. Gram-negative bacteria were responsible for 75.7% of the cases, with Klebsiella pneumoniae being the most prevalent pathogen (32.2%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (14.9%), and both Serratia marcescens and Escherichia coli (10.9% each). Gram-negative bacteria showed significant resistance to third-generation cephalosporins, carbapenems, while gram-positive bacteria demonstrated considerable resistance to clindamycin and oxacillin. However, most gram-positive isolates were susceptible to vancomycin, and gram-negative bacteria had lower resistance to colistin and fosfomycin.

Conclusions: These findings highlight the critical importance of continuous surveillance and tailored antibiotic policies to combat neonatal sepsis effectively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿败血症在越南:细菌概况和抗生素敏感性在三级保健设置。
背景:新生儿败血症是新生儿死亡的主要原因,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家。本研究检查了越南一家三级医院新生儿败血症的细菌病因和抗生素耐药性模式。方法:于2021年1月至2022年12月在越南河内国立儿童医院进行了一项前瞻性横断面研究。所有新生儿临床怀疑败血症和确认阳性血培养被确定。鉴定分离的病原体,并使用标准方案评估抗生素敏感性。结果:202例新生儿确诊为败血症。其中75.2%的病例转诊自其他医院。早发性败血症占15.8%。革兰氏阴性菌占75.7%,其中以肺炎克雷伯菌最多(32.2%),其次为金黄色葡萄球菌(14.9%),粘质沙雷菌和大肠杆菌各占10.9%。革兰氏阴性菌对第三代头孢菌素、碳青霉烯类有明显耐药性,革兰氏阳性菌对克林霉素和奥西林有明显耐药性。大多数革兰氏阳性菌对万古霉素敏感,革兰氏阴性菌对粘菌素和磷霉素的耐药性较低。结论:这些发现强调了持续监测和量身定制的抗生素政策对有效对抗新生儿败血症的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
479
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)
期刊最新文献
Novel color additive for disinfectant wipes and room cleanliness and turnover time: Correspondence. Response to some comments on the efficiency and simulation of Thailand's Chiang Mai University model for COVID-19 mass vaccination hub. Response to the letter to the editor regarding "The impact of a novel color additive for disinfectant wipes on room cleanliness and turnover time". Some comments on the efficiency and simulation of Thailand's Chiang Mai University model for COVID-19 mass vaccination hub. Oral care in nonventilated hospitalized patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1