Gustatory dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.8 4区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Chemical Senses Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1093/chemse/bjae046
Shahryar Rajai Firouzabadi, Ida Mohammadi, Mohammadreza Alinejadfard, Mohammad Yazdan Panah, Saeed Vaheb, Vahid Shaygannejad, Omid Mirmosayyeb
{"title":"Gustatory dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Shahryar Rajai Firouzabadi, Ida Mohammadi, Mohammadreza Alinejadfard, Mohammad Yazdan Panah, Saeed Vaheb, Vahid Shaygannejad, Omid Mirmosayyeb","doi":"10.1093/chemse/bjae046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gustatory dysfunction is an often overlooked symptom in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), potentially leading to poor appetite, malnutrition, weight loss, and decreased quality of life. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the pooled prevalence of gustatory dysfunction in PwMS and compare their gustatory test scores with healthy controls. An online database search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted on 2024 June 29. Observational studies reporting gustatory dysfunction or gustatory test scores in PwMS were included. Pooled prevalence rates were calculated using a random-effects model, with subgroup analyses based on the type of gustatory test used. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated for comparisons between PwMS and healthy controls. A total of 9 studies encompassing 1385 PwMS were included. The pooled prevalence of gustatory dysfunction among PwMS was 16.4% (95% confidence intervals [95% CI]: 8.7% to 24.1%, I² = 90%, P < 0.01). Subgroup analysis showed a prevalence of 18.8% (95% CI: 10.5% to 27.2%, I² = 0%) in 4 studies using the Taste Strip Test (TST), while 3 non-TST studies using liquid tastants or self-reports reported a prevalence of 20.2% (95% CI: 7.2% to 33.3%, I² = 86%). PwMS had significantly lower gustatory test scores compared to healthy controls (SMD: -0.93, 95% CI: -1.20 to -0.65, I² = 0%, P = 0.48). Gustatory dysfunction affects a notable proportion of PwMS, with prevalence rates varying by assessment method. Future studies should assess the possible causes of gustatory dysfunction in PwMS using validated gustatory assessment scales.</p>","PeriodicalId":9771,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Senses","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Senses","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjae046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gustatory dysfunction is an often overlooked symptom in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), potentially leading to poor appetite, malnutrition, weight loss, and decreased quality of life. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the pooled prevalence of gustatory dysfunction in PwMS and compare their gustatory test scores with healthy controls. An online database search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted on 2024 June 29. Observational studies reporting gustatory dysfunction or gustatory test scores in PwMS were included. Pooled prevalence rates were calculated using a random-effects model, with subgroup analyses based on the type of gustatory test used. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated for comparisons between PwMS and healthy controls. A total of 9 studies encompassing 1385 PwMS were included. The pooled prevalence of gustatory dysfunction among PwMS was 16.4% (95% confidence intervals [95% CI]: 8.7% to 24.1%, I² = 90%, P < 0.01). Subgroup analysis showed a prevalence of 18.8% (95% CI: 10.5% to 27.2%, I² = 0%) in 4 studies using the Taste Strip Test (TST), while 3 non-TST studies using liquid tastants or self-reports reported a prevalence of 20.2% (95% CI: 7.2% to 33.3%, I² = 86%). PwMS had significantly lower gustatory test scores compared to healthy controls (SMD: -0.93, 95% CI: -1.20 to -0.65, I² = 0%, P = 0.48). Gustatory dysfunction affects a notable proportion of PwMS, with prevalence rates varying by assessment method. Future studies should assess the possible causes of gustatory dysfunction in PwMS using validated gustatory assessment scales.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多发性硬化症的味觉功能障碍:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
味觉功能障碍是多发性硬化症(PwMS)患者经常被忽视的症状,可能导致食欲不振、营养不良、体重减轻和生活质量下降。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估PwMS患者味觉功能障碍的总体患病率,并将其味觉测试分数与健康对照进行比较。我们于2024年6月29日对PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science进行了在线数据库检索。观察性研究报告了PwMS患者的味觉功能障碍或味觉测试分数。使用随机效应模型计算合并患病率,并根据所使用的味觉测试类型进行亚组分析。计算PwMS与健康对照之间的标准化平均差异(SMD)。共有9项研究纳入了1385例PwMS。PwMS患者中味觉功能障碍的总患病率为16.4% (95% CI: 8.7% ~ 24.1%, I²= 90%,p < 0.01)。亚组分析显示,使用味觉条测试(TST)的四项研究的患病率为18.8% (95% CI: 10.5%至27.2%,I²= 0%),而使用液体品尝剂或自我报告的三项非TST研究报告的患病率为20.2% (95% CI: 7.2%至33.3%,I²= 86%)。与健康对照组相比,PwMS患者的味觉测试分数显著降低(SMD: -0.93, 95% CI: -1.20 ~ -0.65, I²= 0%,p = 0.48)。味觉功能障碍影响着显著比例的PwMS,其患病率因评估方法而异。未来的研究应该使用经过验证的味觉评估量表来评估PwMS中味觉功能障碍的可能原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chemical Senses
Chemical Senses 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
25
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Chemical Senses publishes original research and review papers on all aspects of chemoreception in both humans and animals. An important part of the journal''s coverage is devoted to techniques and the development and application of new methods for investigating chemoreception and chemosensory structures.
期刊最新文献
Functional characterization of Type IV basal cells in rat fungiform taste buds. Sniffing Colors - Color associations for descriptors and odors of the MONEX-40 test. Worldwide study of the taste of bitter medicines and their modifiers. Predicting human olfactory perception by odorant structure and receptor activation profile. Clinical features of taste disorders in Cronkhite-Canada syndrome: a report of 10 cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1