Comparison of diagnostic performance of [68Ga]-Ga-FAPI-46 and [18F]-FDG PET/CT imaging for the detection of lesions and disease staging in patients with breast cancer.

Kiana Radmehr, Saeed Farzanefar, Mehrshad Abbasi, Yalda Salehi, Najme Karamzade-Ziarati, Alireza Emami-Ardekani, Reyhaneh Manafi-Farid, Nasim Vahidfar, Davood Beiki
{"title":"Comparison of diagnostic performance of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]-Ga-FAPI-46 and [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT imaging for the detection of lesions and disease staging in patients with breast cancer.","authors":"Kiana Radmehr, Saeed Farzanefar, Mehrshad Abbasi, Yalda Salehi, Najme Karamzade-Ziarati, Alireza Emami-Ardekani, Reyhaneh Manafi-Farid, Nasim Vahidfar, Davood Beiki","doi":"10.22038/aojnmb.2024.80845.1573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the diagnostic performance of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]-Ga-FAPI-46 and [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT imaging for the detection of lesions and disease staging in breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve female patients with breast cancer (mean age= 49.2±13.29 years) and previous [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT were recruited in the study. [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 imaging performed in all patients within one month after [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT imaging. The acquired PET/CT data with both tracers were reconstructed. Tracer avid lesions with each PET tracer were identified and the semi-quantitative parameters i.e. SUV<sub>max</sub>, lesion counts and target-to-background ratio (TBR<sub>max</sub>) were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physiologic distribution of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]-Ga-FAPI-46 was observed in the liver, blood pool and kidneys, whereas no tracer uptake was noted in the brain and heart. The mean liver SUV<sub>max</sub> for [<sup>68</sup>Ga] Ga-FAPI-46 was 1.5±0.1 which was lower than that noted for [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT (2.9±0.2). Likewise, the mean blood pool SUV<sub>max</sub> value for [<sup>68</sup>Ga]-Ga-FAPI-46 was lower than [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT (1.7±0.1 versus 2.0±0.1). [<sup>68</sup>Ga]-Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT demonstrated higher tracer uptake in the lesions detected in the brain, bone, internal mammary and lymph nodes in 4/12 patients. The overall lesions detections and the mean SUV<sub>max</sub> values did not differ significantly between the two techniques. On the other hand, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]-Ga-FAPI-46 demonstrated higher mean TBR<sub>max</sub> than [<sup>18</sup>F] FDG PET/CT particularly for lesions detected in kidneys, chest wall, mediastinum, and musculoskeletal lesions. However, both techniques offered identical TNM staging.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this preliminary study demonstrated that [<sup>68</sup>Ga]-Ga-FAPI-46 and [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT offered identical disease staging in the breast cancer patients. [<sup>68</sup>Ga]-Ga-FAPI-46 showed lower liver and blood pool uptake and an enhanced tumor-to-background ratio, thereby suggesting its potential for improved lesions detection. This may open opportunity for emerging FAP based radioligand for therapeutic applications in advanced stage breast cancers. However, this needs validation in a larger number of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8503,"journal":{"name":"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology","volume":"13 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11682476/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/aojnmb.2024.80845.1573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the diagnostic performance of [68Ga]-Ga-FAPI-46 and [18F]-FDG PET/CT imaging for the detection of lesions and disease staging in breast cancer.

Methods: Twelve female patients with breast cancer (mean age= 49.2±13.29 years) and previous [18F]-FDG PET/CT were recruited in the study. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 imaging performed in all patients within one month after [18F]-FDG PET/CT imaging. The acquired PET/CT data with both tracers were reconstructed. Tracer avid lesions with each PET tracer were identified and the semi-quantitative parameters i.e. SUVmax, lesion counts and target-to-background ratio (TBRmax) were analyzed.

Results: Physiologic distribution of [68Ga]-Ga-FAPI-46 was observed in the liver, blood pool and kidneys, whereas no tracer uptake was noted in the brain and heart. The mean liver SUVmax for [68Ga] Ga-FAPI-46 was 1.5±0.1 which was lower than that noted for [18F]-FDG PET/CT (2.9±0.2). Likewise, the mean blood pool SUVmax value for [68Ga]-Ga-FAPI-46 was lower than [18F]-FDG PET/CT (1.7±0.1 versus 2.0±0.1). [68Ga]-Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT demonstrated higher tracer uptake in the lesions detected in the brain, bone, internal mammary and lymph nodes in 4/12 patients. The overall lesions detections and the mean SUVmax values did not differ significantly between the two techniques. On the other hand, [68Ga]-Ga-FAPI-46 demonstrated higher mean TBRmax than [18F] FDG PET/CT particularly for lesions detected in kidneys, chest wall, mediastinum, and musculoskeletal lesions. However, both techniques offered identical TNM staging.

Conclusion: The findings of this preliminary study demonstrated that [68Ga]-Ga-FAPI-46 and [18F]-FDG PET/CT offered identical disease staging in the breast cancer patients. [68Ga]-Ga-FAPI-46 showed lower liver and blood pool uptake and an enhanced tumor-to-background ratio, thereby suggesting its potential for improved lesions detection. This may open opportunity for emerging FAP based radioligand for therapeutic applications in advanced stage breast cancers. However, this needs validation in a larger number of patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[68Ga]-Ga-FAPI-46与[18F]-FDG PET/CT对乳腺癌病变及分期诊断价值的比较
目的:比较[68Ga]-Ga-FAPI-46与[18F]-FDG PET/CT对乳腺癌病变及分期的诊断价值。方法:选取12例女性乳腺癌患者,平均年龄49.2±13.29岁,既往[18F]-FDG PET/CT检查。[68Ga]所有患者在[18F]-FDG PET/CT成像后一个月内进行Ga-FAPI-46成像。对两种示踪剂所获得的PET/CT数据进行重建。对每种PET示踪剂的示踪剂病变进行鉴定,并分析半定量参数SUVmax、病变计数和靶本比(TBRmax)。结果:[68Ga]-Ga-FAPI-46在肝脏、血池和肾脏均有生理分布,而在脑和心脏未见示踪剂摄取。[68Ga] Ga-FAPI-46的平均肝脏SUVmax为1.5±0.1,低于[18F]-FDG PET/CT的2.9±0.2。同样,[68Ga]-Ga-FAPI-46的平均血池SUVmax值低于[18F]-FDG PET/CT(1.7±0.1比2.0±0.1)。[68Ga]-Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT显示4/12患者在脑、骨、内乳腺和淋巴结病变中示踪剂摄取较高。两种技术的总体病变检出率和平均SUVmax值没有显著差异。另一方面,[68Ga]-Ga-FAPI-46显示出比[18F] FDG PET/CT更高的平均TBRmax,特别是对于肾脏、胸壁、纵隔和肌肉骨骼病变。然而,两种技术提供相同的TNM分期。结论:本初步研究结果表明[68Ga]-Ga-FAPI-46与[18F]-FDG PET/CT对乳腺癌患者的分期相同。[68Ga]-Ga-FAPI-46显示肝脏和血池摄取较低,肿瘤与背景比增强,从而表明其具有改善病变检测的潜力。这可能为新出现的基于FAP的放射配体在晚期乳腺癌的治疗应用提供了机会。然而,这需要在更多的患者中进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology
Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
[18F]FDG PET/CT volumetric biomarkers for non-invasive prediction of HER2 expression in breast cancer patients. 18F-FDG PET/CT in lymphangiosarcoma: A case report and review of literature. Animal-based radiation absorbed dose evaluation of holmium-166 labeled hydroxyapatite particulates in liver malignancies. Comparison of diagnostic performance of [68Ga]-Ga-FAPI-46 and [18F]-FDG PET/CT imaging for the detection of lesions and disease staging in patients with breast cancer. Considerations and Indications for Gastric Emptying Scintigraphy in Lung Transplant Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1