Impact of Changes to In-hospital Drug Formularies on Out-of-hospital Prescription Rates and Cost: A Systematic Review.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.12.005
Eduardo Carracedo-Martínez, Nuria Choren-Alvarez, Raquel Vázquez-Mourelle, Adolfo Figueiras
{"title":"Impact of Changes to In-hospital Drug Formularies on Out-of-hospital Prescription Rates and Cost: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Eduardo Carracedo-Martínez, Nuria Choren-Alvarez, Raquel Vázquez-Mourelle, Adolfo Figueiras","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>One of the main goals of an in-hospital drug formulary (in-HDF) is to modulate hospitalized patients' drug utilization. Theoretically, however, in-HDFs could also have an impact on out-of-hospital prescriptions in several ways, including discharged patients taking chronic medications that were initiated during hospitalization, hospital physicians prescribing to outpatients as if in-HDFs were equally applicable to the latter (\"spillover effect\"), and primary care physicians subsequently not changing such prescriptions (\"induced prescription\"). The aim of this study was thus to conduct a systematic review of papers that studied the impact of changes to in-HDF on out-of-hospital prescriptions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a search of the PubMed and Embase databases. To be eligible for inclusion, studies had to be reported in English, Spanish, French, or Portuguese; as their designated aim, studies had to seek to evaluate the impact of a change in at least 1 active ingredient in the in-HDF on out-of-hospital prescriptions; and studies had to have at least 1 control period before the in-HDF change or a control group without any such change.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 8 studies met the inclusion criteria: in 7 of these, out-of-hospital drug-utilization rates changed in line with the changes made to in-HDFs, with a decrease if the drug had been removed or restricted and an increase if the drug had been included and/or the opposite for competitor me-too medicines. Only 4 papers analyzed the impact on costs, half of which reported no statistically significant result.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Changes to in-HDFs have an impact on out-of-hospital prescription rates. Further studies are needed to examine the cost aspect since a research gap has been identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.12.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: One of the main goals of an in-hospital drug formulary (in-HDF) is to modulate hospitalized patients' drug utilization. Theoretically, however, in-HDFs could also have an impact on out-of-hospital prescriptions in several ways, including discharged patients taking chronic medications that were initiated during hospitalization, hospital physicians prescribing to outpatients as if in-HDFs were equally applicable to the latter ("spillover effect"), and primary care physicians subsequently not changing such prescriptions ("induced prescription"). The aim of this study was thus to conduct a systematic review of papers that studied the impact of changes to in-HDF on out-of-hospital prescriptions.

Methods: We conducted a search of the PubMed and Embase databases. To be eligible for inclusion, studies had to be reported in English, Spanish, French, or Portuguese; as their designated aim, studies had to seek to evaluate the impact of a change in at least 1 active ingredient in the in-HDF on out-of-hospital prescriptions; and studies had to have at least 1 control period before the in-HDF change or a control group without any such change.

Findings: A total of 8 studies met the inclusion criteria: in 7 of these, out-of-hospital drug-utilization rates changed in line with the changes made to in-HDFs, with a decrease if the drug had been removed or restricted and an increase if the drug had been included and/or the opposite for competitor me-too medicines. Only 4 papers analyzed the impact on costs, half of which reported no statistically significant result.

Implications: Changes to in-HDFs have an impact on out-of-hospital prescription rates. Further studies are needed to examine the cost aspect since a research gap has been identified.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
院内药物处方变化对院外处方率和成本的影响:一项系统综述。
目的:院内药物处方(in-HDF)的主要目标之一是调节住院患者的药物利用。然而,从理论上讲,in- hdfs也可能以多种方式影响院外处方,包括出院患者服用住院期间开始的慢性药物,医院医生给门诊患者开处方,好像in- hdfs同样适用于后者(“溢出效应”),以及初级保健医生随后不改变这些处方(“诱导处方”)。因此,本研究的目的是对研究hdf变化对院外处方影响的论文进行系统审查。方法:检索PubMed和Embase数据库。为了符合纳入条件,研究报告必须使用英语、西班牙语、法语或葡萄牙语;作为其指定目标,研究必须设法评估hdf中至少一种活性成分的变化对院外处方的影响;并且研究必须在in-HDF改变之前至少有一个对照期或没有任何这种改变的对照组。结果:共有8项研究符合纳入标准:在其中7项研究中,院外药物使用率的变化与in- hdfs的变化一致,如果药物已被移除或限制,则降低,如果药物已被纳入,则增加,而/或竞争对手的仿制药物则相反。只有4篇论文分析了对成本的影响,其中一半没有报告统计上显著的结果。含义:in-HDFs的变化对院外处方率有影响。由于已经确定了研究差距,因此需要进一步研究以审查成本方面的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical therapeutics
Clinical therapeutics 医学-药学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
154
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Therapeutics provides peer-reviewed, rapid publication of recent developments in drug and other therapies as well as in diagnostics, pharmacoeconomics, health policy, treatment outcomes, and innovations in drug and biologics research. In addition Clinical Therapeutics features updates on specific topics collated by expert Topic Editors. Clinical Therapeutics is read by a large international audience of scientists and clinicians in a variety of research, academic, and clinical practice settings. Articles are indexed by all major biomedical abstracting databases.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Oral Medication in Weight Loss Management: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Managed Entry Agreements: Tools of Necessity, Works in Progress. Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Refine Dosing of Posaconazole in Young Children. Real-World Treatment Patterns Among US Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Initiating Treatment With Once Weekly Semaglutide for Diabetes. Assessing Experiences With Trofinetide for Rett Syndrome: Interviews With Caregivers of Participants in Clinical Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1