Effect and individual response to inspiratory muscle training program among instrumentalist musicians.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY Frontiers in Physiology Pub Date : 2024-12-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphys.2024.1522438
Ana Ibáñez-Pegenaute, María Ortega-Moneo, Robinson Ramírez-Vélez, M M Antón
{"title":"Effect and individual response to inspiratory muscle training program among instrumentalist musicians.","authors":"Ana Ibáñez-Pegenaute, María Ortega-Moneo, Robinson Ramírez-Vélez, M M Antón","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2024.1522438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this quasi-experimental before-after trial, we investigated the effects of a high-intensity, low-repetition inspiratory muscle training (HI-LRMT) protocol on respiratory muscle strength in instrumental musicians. In addition, was to estimate the prevalence of \"non-responders\" (NRs) in terms of muscle force after intervention. Healthy musicians (<i>n</i> = 48) were divided into 2 groups: HI-LRMT (<i>n</i> = 33) and a control group that did not train (CG, <i>n</i> = 15). The intervention training was a high-intensity, low-repetition inspiratory muscle training program using the PowerBreathe<sup>®</sup> threshold load pressure device, 2 daily sessions of 30 repetitions per session, with a minimum frequency of 5 days per week, for 12 weeks, 5 min per session. The primary outcome measures were maximal inspiratory pressure and expiratory pressure. Change in PImax over 12 weeks for HI-LRMT vs. control was 30.9 (95% CI 25.5-38.3), with the large effect, confirming worthwhile benefits (<i>ηp</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.61). There were significant changes in PEmax 37.3 (95% CI 19.3-48.1), with a large effect size (<i>ηp</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.33). A third of the participants did not demonstrate improvements in terms of muscle force in instrumental musicians. In conclusion, a 12-week high-intensity, low-repetition inspiratory muscle training program using the PowerBreathe<sup>®</sup> threshold load pressure device, improved inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength in instrumental musicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1522438"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11688244/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1522438","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this quasi-experimental before-after trial, we investigated the effects of a high-intensity, low-repetition inspiratory muscle training (HI-LRMT) protocol on respiratory muscle strength in instrumental musicians. In addition, was to estimate the prevalence of "non-responders" (NRs) in terms of muscle force after intervention. Healthy musicians (n = 48) were divided into 2 groups: HI-LRMT (n = 33) and a control group that did not train (CG, n = 15). The intervention training was a high-intensity, low-repetition inspiratory muscle training program using the PowerBreathe® threshold load pressure device, 2 daily sessions of 30 repetitions per session, with a minimum frequency of 5 days per week, for 12 weeks, 5 min per session. The primary outcome measures were maximal inspiratory pressure and expiratory pressure. Change in PImax over 12 weeks for HI-LRMT vs. control was 30.9 (95% CI 25.5-38.3), with the large effect, confirming worthwhile benefits (ηp 2 = 0.61). There were significant changes in PEmax 37.3 (95% CI 19.3-48.1), with a large effect size (ηp 2 = 0.33). A third of the participants did not demonstrate improvements in terms of muscle force in instrumental musicians. In conclusion, a 12-week high-intensity, low-repetition inspiratory muscle training program using the PowerBreathe® threshold load pressure device, improved inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength in instrumental musicians.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
器乐音乐家对吸气肌训练方案的效果及个人反应。
在这个准实验前后试验中,我们研究了高强度、低重复的吸气肌训练(HI-LRMT)方案对器乐音乐家呼吸肌力量的影响。此外,旨在评估干预后肌肉力量方面“无反应”(NRs)的患病率。健康音乐家(n = 48)分为2组:HI-LRMT组(n = 33)和不训练的对照组(CG组,n = 15)。干预训练是一个高强度、低重复的吸气肌训练项目,使用PowerBreathe®阈值负荷压力装置,每天2次,每次30次重复,每周最少5天,持续12周,每次5分钟。主要结局指标为最大吸气压和最大呼气压。HI-LRMT组与对照组相比,12周内PImax的变化为30.9 (95% CI 25.5-38.3),效果显著,证实了值得的获益(ηp 2 = 0.61)。PEmax 37.3有显著变化(95% CI 19.3-48.1),效应量较大(ηp 2 = 0.33)。三分之一的参与者在器乐音乐家的肌肉力量方面没有表现出改善。总之,使用PowerBreathe®阈值负荷压力装置进行为期12周的高强度、低重复的吸气肌训练,可以改善器乐音乐家的吸气和呼气肌力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Deep learning approach for objective differentiation of kidney deficiency syndrome in reproductive age females: a tongue-face fusion model. Is conduction system pacing improving cardiac performance in patients with right bundle branch block and heart failure? Correction: Standing under pressure: hemodynamic effects of abdominal compression type and intensity in healthy adults. Editorial: Translating biomechanics of the human airways for classification, diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary diseases. Interrogating pulmonary diffusing capacity in long COVID: insights from DLCO and DLNO testing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1