Medication reconciliation in intensive care units of a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia: An evaluation of medication discrepancies.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.5414/CP204690
Samaher A Alatmi, Mohammad Aljawadi, Mansour Almuqbil, Sarah Aldakhil, Ebtisam M Alqahtani, Reema A Almalke, Mohammed M Alshammari, Abdullah M Alhammad
{"title":"Medication reconciliation in intensive care units of a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia: An evaluation of medication discrepancies.","authors":"Samaher A Alatmi, Mohammad Aljawadi, Mansour Almuqbil, Sarah Aldakhil, Ebtisam M Alqahtani, Reema A Almalke, Mohammed M Alshammari, Abdullah M Alhammad","doi":"10.5414/CP204690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients discharged from intensive care units (ICUs) are at higher risk for medication discrepancies, which can harm patients, increase healthcare costs, and lead to readmission. This study aimed to describe the frequency and types of medication discrepancies among ICU patients upon discharge and identify the factors associated with medication discrepancies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients ≥ 18 years old, admitted to medical or surgical ICUs, and discharged on one or more medications. This study was done at a tertiary university hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Data were collected through chart review over a 3-month period in 2018. Medication discrepancy was defined as any difference identified between the documented home medication list and the medication list on ICU discharge without any clearly documented justification. χ<sup>2</sup>, Fisher exact test, and logistic regression were used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 204 screened patients, 121 were included. The mean age was 51 ± 15.7 years, 57 (47.1%) were female, and 91 (75.2%) were admitted to the surgical ICU. The median ICU length of stay was 3 (2 - 7) days. In total, 216 medication discrepancies were identified; only 23 (19%) patients were discharged without any medication discrepancies. The mean medication discrepancies identified per patient were 2 ± 1. The most common type of medication discrepancies identified were no indication of therapy (43.8%), drug omissions (33.7%), and discrepancies in the duration of therapy (11.2%). Mechanically ventilated patients were less likely to have medication discrepancies upon discharge (OR = 0.24, 95% CI = (0.07 - 0.90)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated many medication discrepancies among patients discharged from ICUs at KSUMC University Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The lack of a systematic approach to medication reconciliation might contribute to the increased number of medication discrepancies in comparison to multiple studies in different countries exploring the medication discrepancies among ICU patients. Establishing a process that includes pharmacist-driven medication reconciliation is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":13963,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"63-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5414/CP204690","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients discharged from intensive care units (ICUs) are at higher risk for medication discrepancies, which can harm patients, increase healthcare costs, and lead to readmission. This study aimed to describe the frequency and types of medication discrepancies among ICU patients upon discharge and identify the factors associated with medication discrepancies.

Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients ≥ 18 years old, admitted to medical or surgical ICUs, and discharged on one or more medications. This study was done at a tertiary university hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Data were collected through chart review over a 3-month period in 2018. Medication discrepancy was defined as any difference identified between the documented home medication list and the medication list on ICU discharge without any clearly documented justification. χ2, Fisher exact test, and logistic regression were used to analyze the data.

Results: Out of 204 screened patients, 121 were included. The mean age was 51 ± 15.7 years, 57 (47.1%) were female, and 91 (75.2%) were admitted to the surgical ICU. The median ICU length of stay was 3 (2 - 7) days. In total, 216 medication discrepancies were identified; only 23 (19%) patients were discharged without any medication discrepancies. The mean medication discrepancies identified per patient were 2 ± 1. The most common type of medication discrepancies identified were no indication of therapy (43.8%), drug omissions (33.7%), and discrepancies in the duration of therapy (11.2%). Mechanically ventilated patients were less likely to have medication discrepancies upon discharge (OR = 0.24, 95% CI = (0.07 - 0.90)).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated many medication discrepancies among patients discharged from ICUs at KSUMC University Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The lack of a systematic approach to medication reconciliation might contribute to the increased number of medication discrepancies in comparison to multiple studies in different countries exploring the medication discrepancies among ICU patients. Establishing a process that includes pharmacist-driven medication reconciliation is needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙特阿拉伯一家三级医院重症监护病房的药物和解:对药物差异的评估。
背景:从重症监护病房(icu)出院的患者用药不一致的风险较高,这可能会伤害患者,增加医疗保健费用,并导致再入院。本研究旨在描述ICU患者出院时用药差异的频率和类型,并确定与用药差异相关的因素。材料和方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入年龄≥18岁、入住内科或外科icu、出院时使用一种或多种药物的患者。这项研究是在沙特阿拉伯利雅得的一所高等大学医院进行的。数据是通过2018年3个月的图表审查收集的。用药差异定义为在没有明确证明的情况下,家庭用药清单与ICU出院时用药清单之间存在的任何差异。采用χ2、Fisher精确检验和logistic回归进行数据分析。结果:在204例筛查患者中,121例纳入。平均年龄51±15.7岁,女性57例(47.1%),91例(75.2%)入外科ICU。ICU住院时间中位数为3(2 ~ 7)天。共发现216例用药差异;只有23例(19%)患者出院时无任何用药差异。每位患者确定的平均用药差异为2±1。确定的最常见的药物差异类型是无治疗指征(43.8%),药物遗漏(33.7%)和治疗时间差异(11.2%)。机械通气患者出院时出现药物差异的可能性较小(OR = 0.24, 95% CI =(0.07 - 0.90))。结论:本研究显示了沙特阿拉伯利雅得KSUMC大学医院icu出院患者的用药差异。与不同国家探索ICU患者用药差异的多项研究相比,缺乏系统的药物调节方法可能导致用药差异数量增加。需要建立一个包括药剂师驱动的药物协调的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics appears monthly and publishes manuscripts containing original material with emphasis on the following topics: Clinical trials, Pharmacoepidemiology - Pharmacovigilance, Pharmacodynamics, Drug disposition and Pharmacokinetics, Quality assurance, Pharmacogenetics, Biotechnological drugs such as cytokines and recombinant antibiotics. Case reports on adverse reactions are also of interest.
期刊最新文献
Skin adhesion of a newly developed, bioequivalent rotigotine patch formulation in comparison to the originator product: Results of a multi-center, randomized, crossover trial in patients with Parkinson's disease. Warfarin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are not affected by concomitant administration of the long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonist polyethylene glycol loxenatide. Antibiotic treatment of ceftriaxone-susceptible Serratia marcescens bacteremia: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study. Medication reconciliation in intensive care units of a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia: An evaluation of medication discrepancies. Sarcopenia with muscle wasting in hepatic cancer predicts therapeutic outcome after hepatic artery intervention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1